M/s. Regency Ceramics Ltd. N.N.House, Chirag Ali Lane., Abids, Hyderabad v. The lncome Tax Officer, tNard 2 (2), Hyderabad
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 18 Dec 2025
- Bench
- P SAM KOSHY, P SAM I OSHY
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI D. BALU, REPRESENTING M/S. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondents: SRI BOKARO SAPNA REDDY (SENtOR SC rNcoME TAX) The Court made the following
ORDER:
) IN THE IIIGH COT]RT FORTHE STATE OF T]] LANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM I OSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO ITTA.No.529 of 2Ol2 Dated: 18.12.2025 Between: M/s.Regency Ceramics Ltd., N.N.House, Chirag Ati Lane, Abids, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director Dr.G.N.Naidu AND The Income Tax Officer, Ward2(2), Hyderabad. ...Appellant . .Respondent ORDER' (per IIon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy) Mr.D.Balu. leamed counsel for the appellarLl representing IWs.CKR Associates, submits that in spite of best efforts the appellant has not been contacting nor is he traceable and, thtr:fore. Ieamed counsel for thc appellant pleads no instructions. 2 \!-\ .\ +:!(tn
2. In view of the same, this Bench is left with no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellant to revive the same with an appropriate application with justifiable reasons, that too in case if the grievance still survives.
3. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closcd SD/- N SRIHARI DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "B" Hyderabad 2. One CC to M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES, Advocate [OPUC] 3 One CC to SRl. BOKARO SAPNA REDDY (SENIOR SC INCOME TAX) Advocate [OPUC]
Two CD CoPies W kut/PSL HIGH COURT DATEO:181'|212025 ORDER |TTA.No.S29 of 2012 DISMISSING THE IT'I'A WITHOTJT COSTS b .,\ \1/ -<i., ji' ( t) \ ,( t Dc- . . -. l';-')- .--.--.'". l:-l . --:.' " ), a
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Tax Act, 1961.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 18 Dec 2025. The bench was P SAM KOSHY, P SAM I OSHY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.