The High Court · 2025

Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for Telangana State, Hyderabad. 2. Farzana Begum, Wo Yaheya Pasha, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Household, Rlo 18-11 -67 lN45l26/E Salala Barkas, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 528 OF BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioner Accused No.'1 and 2 in C.C. No.8327 ol 2021 On the file of the XV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Nampally against the Petitioners/Accused '1 and 2 for the Offences U/s 498-4, 506 IPC and Sec 4 of DP Act. "f l.A. NO: 2 OF 2 02s Between: F arzana Begum, Wo Yaheya Pasha, Aged about 35 ye:rrs, Occ. Household, R/o 18-1 1-67lAl45l26lE Salala Barkas, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.2 in LA NOS. 2 & 3 OF 2025 Yaheya Pasha, S/o Late Mohd Abdul Sattar. Aged r\bout 37 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o H.No 11-3-130, Beside Bac:i Masjid, Mallepally, Hyderabad, Telangana. Zakatiya Pasha @ Mohammed Zakriya, S/o Late Mr>t d Abdul Sattar, Aged About 34_years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o H.No 12 2-233, Ganeshnagar, Siddipet, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS in t.A, NOS. 2 & 3 OF 2025 The State of Telangana, Women Police Station, South Z,:ne, Hyderabad Dist., Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for Telangana S tate, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1 in LA NOS. 2 & 3 OF 2025 AND 1 2 J Petition under Section 359(6) OF BNSS praying thel n the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition ttre High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to compound the offenc::; in C.C. No.8327 of 2021 On file of the XV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate l',lampally against the Petitioners/Accused 1 and 2 For the Offences U/s 498-4. r(.6, lpc and Sec.4 of DP Act. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) OF BNSS praying that n the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise in C.C. No.B327 of 202r {ln the file of the XV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Nampally against the Petit,rners/Accused 1 & 2 for the Offences U/s 498-4, 506, IPC and Sec.4 of DP Act : nr1 allow the parties to compromise the matter. These Petitions coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argunrernts of Sri G SHIVA KUMAR, Advocate for the Petitioners in the main CRLP anc for the Respondent Nos.'1 &2 in l.A. NOS.2 & 3 OF 2O25and SRt JTTHENDEFI RAOVEERAMALLA, the Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1 in the main CRLp and for Respondent No 3 in l.A. NOS. 2 & 3 OF 2025 and of Sr \/OHD MOHIUDDIN, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 in the main CRLp and for petitioner in l.A. NOS.2&30F2025 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER ,ffi7i|il&a(g* , THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.9749 ot 2025 COMMON ORDER. This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.8327 of 2021 on the file of learned XV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate , Nampally, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498-4, 506 of IPC and Section 4 of DP Act.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused Nos.l and 2 as well as respondent No.2lde facto complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions.

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 which disclose that she has willingly 2 t.-.lp 9719 )023 consented for compromise. Since the parties we.n} willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to sr;flre the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel befrrrr-. the High court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telarrg ana yrde orders dated 01 08.2025 passed by this Court. The Sec.etary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the part es and submit a report to that effect

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued :,i this Court, the parties along lvith their respective counsel have ap1;611sd before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State'f Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identifieci the parties and submitted a report dated 12.08.2025 stating that he pa(ies were identified and they have willfully and without any r;cercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. ln view of the above, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O?_:\ are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal petition is allowed and .hr-. proceedings in C.C.No.8327 of 2021 on the file of learneo XV Additional lrletropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, registered againsl the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2, are hereby quashe,j subject to the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 paying an amount cf Rs.5.000/_ I I I J ETD.J Crlp_9749 2025 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/. N. SRIHARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR I ,TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To,

1. The XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. 2. The Station House Officer, WPS south zone, Hyderabad. 3. One CC to SRI G SHIVA KUMAR, Advocate IOPUC] 4. One CC to SRI MOHD MOHIUDDIN, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies GR/PSL Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise Note: Total Amount of Rs. '10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri G SHIVA KUMAR, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 22.08.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, Sainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance vide USR No. 107528 OF 2025 dated 25-09-2025 HIGH COURT DATED:2210812025 COMMON ORDER I.A.NOS.2 AND 3 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP 9749 0F 2025 20 :tP ltll5 '"(.1',. ALLOWING BOTH THE l.As AND THE CRLP 1-613 ,4 r-, THE HIGH COTIRT FOR THE STATE OF TtrLANGANA .f,T HYDERABAD &t\6 z1?z{= crl. P. No,2,^ u 6f u ozs l4q1 Bctween: Yaheya Pasha S/o Late. Mohamrned Abdul Sattar @ Late. Abdul Sattar Aged About 37 years Occ; Private Ernployee, R/o FIno 11-3-130 beside Badi Masjid Mal lepalll,, Hyderabad Tclangana

2. ZakariyaPasha @ Mohamnred Zaktiya S/o Late Mohammed Abdui Sattar. Aged About 34 years Occ; private Employee, R-/o H.no 12-2-233 Ganeshnagar, Siddipet Telangana AND ..Petitioners I . l'he State of Telangana Women Police Station, Sor-rth Zone, I{ydcrabad Dist, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for Telangana State Fl_vderabad.

2. ['arzana Begum Wo Yaheya pasha Aged about 35 years, Ooc: Household, R/o 1 8-l l-67 I Al,t5l26/D Salaia Barkas, Hyderabad .IOINT COMPROMI SE MEN{O FILED BY THE PtrTITIONERS /ACCUSED 1& 2 AND RTSPONDIINT No.2 /De-facto Complainant . . .ltesp.ondents May it please your Lordship I . l-hat both the parties have settled rheir dispute amicably and entered into cornpronise. The Respondent No. 2 filed an affidavit in the above petition to that elfect.

2.-l.I'relefore.botlrtlreparliespraythatthisHon,bleCrltrLtrraybepleasedto quash the proceedings against the Peritioners in c.c. No.8l '.'; of 2021on the frle of the LIon'bte xV Additional Met|opotitalr Magistrate "'. mpalll' agai[rst thc Petitioners/Accuseci [ & 2 for the olfences U/s 498-A, 506. ll,C and Sec.4 olDP Act in the ir-rterest ol-.iustice and may pass such other ordel o ,'rdcrs as the Hon'ble Court may cleem fit lLnd proper in the circutnstances oltht ' rsc' Yaheya Pasha (Acctrscd No. l) 11 Zakaril'e Pasha (Accuse J No. 1t Falzatta BeglLnl (Respondcnt No. l) l)c-hcro ComPlainant Couuse the l)etitioncr Daled:14.01 .2025 Hyderabad. o Counsel rortlii l "rlLespondent /De-facto ConrP)l inaltt