The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that circumstances stated in tnJrtr[""ii tir"d therewith, the High court may be pleased di;;til,';;re particularly, one in the nature of writ of to issue a writ, order, ", " Iliion'" oi the Respondents in not reviewing and Mandamus, dectaring tnu withdrawing the Look ort c.i"rr"i. ajainst the Petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and 60nstitution o{.lndia, and consequently direct violative of Articles r+ "nolioilh" the Respondents to immed]'tJfv'i'ft" tt"ps to withdraw the Look out Circulars against the Petitioners 'in ir-"-E*t=rFE+-y' ,/ / lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in If 31i9:yl lil"9 jl r.rppg.t of the petition, ti.,""nish Court may be pteased to oiiect rne Kespondent No.4 to iqno.re the pending Locs (Look out agahst the Petitioners by Responden-ts No. 1 to 3 in [ration to Non-Bairabre warrants issued in relation to c.c. No. 5984 of 2024 before Hon'bre XV Additionar crrieiluJLiar Magistrate at Hyderabad and permit the petitioners to traver without any hinderance, delay or obstruction -circutars) Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. ALLU MIDHUN KUMAR counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 3: sRr B. SRTDHAR AGp FoR HOME Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: Ms. B. KAVITA YADAV The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE K. LAKSHMAN /4 WRIT PETITION No. 22641 of 2O25 ORDE,R: Heard Sri Midhun Kumar Allu, learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri B.Sridhar, learned Assistant Govemtnent Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.l to 3 and Ms.B.Kavita Yadav, learned counsel for lespondent No.4

2. The pctitionels hercin are accused Nos.2 and 3 in C.C.No.5984 of 2024, pending on the flle ol tl.re learned XV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. The offences levelled against them are under Section 498-4,,406,506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1980, and Sections 3, 4 and 6 of the Dowry Plohibition Act, 1961. The trial Court issued non-bailable waffants against both the petitioners in the said case. Since the petitionels were not cooperating with the trial Courl in concluding the trial, respondent No.3 originated a Look Out Circular against them. The petitioner No.l has appeared before the trial Courl and got the said non-bailable wan-ant recalled. In proof of the same, a copy of the order dated 30.01.2025 in C.C. No. 5984 of 2024 has been filed 2

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners, on rnstructions, rt. would submit that petitioner No.l is a resident of Chennai and petitioner No.2 is presently residing in Dubai, and both of thern will cooperate with the trial Court in concluding the trial in the said CASE. He has also sent a representation dated 09.04.2025 to the official email ID of respondent No.4, with a request to rcvicw and withdraw the Look Out Circular issued against the pctitioners Reliance is also placed on the guidelines issued bv the Ministry ol Horne Affairs, Foreigners Division, Governrnent of lndia vidc Oftlce Memorandum dated 2l .10.2010. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said representation, respondent No.3 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.3, the present writ petition is filed

4. Whcreas, the leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader lor Home appearing fol respondent Nos.l to 3 on insLructions would submit that respondent No.3 wilt consider the said representation submitted by the petitioners and also the guideiines dated 21 .10.2010 on issuance of the Court circulars.

5. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, the writ petition is disposed ot directing respondent No.3 to consider the representation dated 09.04.2025, as well as the guidelines issued by w 2 / the Ministry of Home Affairs, Foreigners Division, Govetament of India, vide Office Memorandum dated 21 .10.2010, and to take -1 necessary action in accordance with law. However, the petitioners shall cooperate with the trial Court in concluding the trial in the aforesaid C.C, failing which, liberty is granted to respondent No.3 to take appropriate steps against the petitioners in accordance with law. The said exercise shall be completed within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 'fhere shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, i1' any pending, shall stand closed. SD/. AHMED ABDULLAH KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC OFFICER To, "Hitr rort' Adarsh Nasar' Hyderalad, Telangana - 500063'

1. The Principal Secretary Home Department' O/o Telanoana Secretariat ' a;'kji"ii,"d,;sr6ti#; #;ii";"dr;'Hh""i", tru ++' ' B',::i'3t:i:,:JftlfJ,:, :'l!,: Jl*:Yix?l;13lils ?s6state " iri"-rio'rai oto,tz_z-ez6hii e, viv"kananda colony community Hall, 4. The Commissioner, Bureau of lmmigration, Ivlinistry.of Home Affairs' Union of - tildE;;f Br"ir.-viri L.i'iJ-V, s;;i6ii' Rbma Kriihna Puram' New Delhi -

3.TheStationHouseofficer,WomenPoliceStation(SouthWestZone ivrLt'aipli"dm, Hyderabad - 500 028, Telangana Po rice Head 1 10 066

5. One CC to SRl. ALLU MIDHUN KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Ms. B. KAVITA YADAV Advocate IOPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FoR HOME ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [oUT] 8. Two CD CoPies KKS LS / , d $ ST,AT€ o () 21 NiB ?$.i5 c)x 1l( :. * HIGH COURT DATED:01 10812025 ORDER WP.No.22641 of 2025 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS /1/z l? 79/t