Maddubaigari Ashfaque Hussain Ahmed v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, orcier or direction especially one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for the post of s.G.T., in DSC 2O24 of Rajanna sircilla District as per the law laid down by this Hon',ble court in writ Appeal No.S1 1 of 2021 dated 31-12-2021 though it is a non joining vacancy as per the law settled which is clearly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and unjust while appointing in another districts in the same vacancies. consequently declare the petitioner is entifled for appointment to the post of sGT in non joining vacancy of DSC 2024 as s.G.T., with Hall Ticket No24361114521'180 in Rajanna sircilla District who has not joined for the said post as per the law laid down by this Hon'ble court in writ Appeal No.51 1 of 2021 , daled 31-12-2021 as per her merit, rank, roaster with all consequential benefits in the existing non joining vacancy ,77F7-7 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the official respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of SGT in Rajanna Sircilla District as per her merit, rank and roaster till then not to nottfy or carry forward the said vacancy, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. N. MALATHI NAIDU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER r-1. THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.224A4 0F 2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is Iiled aggrieved by the impugned action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of t.a:.,in DSC 2024 of Rajanna Siricilla District as per the law laid down by this Court in Writ Appeal No.511 of 2O2t dated 31.I2.2O2t, though it is a non joining vacancy as per the law settled which is clearly iiiegal, arbitrar5r, discriminatory afld unjust.

2. Heard Mr. N. Malathi Naidu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner ald learned Government pleader for Services_I appearing for the respondents and perused the material available on record.

3. l,earned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner belongs to BC-E category from Rajanna Sircilla District and he possessed SSC, Intermediate and M.Sc, D.Ed and B.Ed qualifications. It is further submitted that the 2nd respondent issued DSC-2O24 Notification No.24lRC- 1TRT I DSC / 2024 dated .O2.2O24. He appeared for the said examination and results . I I I I I i I I i i I i I ,'. have been declared and he secured marks of 54.57 (out of 100) ald in 1:3 Selected candidates list, the petitioner is at Sl.No.162 with rank 379 arrd 4 in BC-E and as he belongs to BC-E category, the petitioner comes within llre zone of consideration for appointment to the said post. It is further submitted that the vacancy is available in DSC 2024 still 187 posts are vacant, Therefore, in the process of selection, the petitioner is entitled for appointment against the said vacancy. But, as per the vacancy list, the petitioner's case was not considered. Aggrieved by the sarne, the petitioner has made a representation dated

24.07 .2025, before the respondent authorities, seeking to consider his case for appointment to the SGT job in Rajanna Siricilla District. But, till today, the said representation is pending before the respondent authorities. Hence, the present writ petition is filed.

4. Learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the respondents submitted that the respondents would consider the representation dated 24.07.2025, submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law.

5. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for both the parties, without expressing any opinion on I I I i I I I I '! i i // '/7//., .*3*- -€.=w--:ir, I,,/, .a I I the merits of the case, the respoq6snt authorities are directed to consider the representation dated 24.07.2025, submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of, at the admission stage itself. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. SD/-P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SE ON OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Building,

2. The Director of School Education, State of Telangana, at Saifabad ' T.S.,Hyderabad. Hyderabad.

3. The District Collector, Raianna Sircilla District, at Sircilla. 4. The District Educational Officer, Rajanna Sircilla District, at Sircilla. 5. One CC to SRl. N. MALATHI NAIDU, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES I ,High Court for the State of Telangana at 7. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] B IVI BS 0p. HIGH COURT DATED:0110812025 \ o oY. 12 AUC 0

44.1.,i.,- I ORDER WP.No.22484 of 2025 I I I I I t I I I : j I I I I I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT FETITION AT THE ADMISSION STAGE WITHOUT COSTS {c fi$ 'il-ilil | '-/