K.Veera Venkata Rama Krishna Mohana Rao v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or more in the nature of a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction, declaring the action of the Respondents Nos.2 to 4 in mentioning agricultural land in respect of lands in sy.nos.93/1/0 to an extent of Ac.3.20 gts of Pulumamidi Village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District instead of NALA land, even though the land was cortverted into plots long back by virtue of DTCP proceedings L.P.Nos;.309/06/HRO/H2 in Lr.D. Dis. No.1 706/2006/H RO/H2 d1.23.09.2006, L.P.Nor;.31 2i06lHRO/H2 in Lr.D.Dis.No.1701i2006/HRO/H2 dt.23.09.2006 and L.P.N,:s.315/06/HRO/H2 in Lr.D.Dis.No.1696/2006/HRO/H2 dt.25.09.2006 to an extent of Ac.15.00 gts in Sy.No.93/1 known as Vasanth Valley (Venkateshwara Estate) is illegal, arbitrary against to the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to enter as NALA land instead of agricultural land in respect of land in Sy.nos.93/1/0 to an extent of Ac,3.20 gts of Pulumamidi Village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District by conside ring the Petitioners representations dt.03.07.2025. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Unde' Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to enter as NALA land nstead of agricultural land in respect of land in Sy.nos.93/1/0 to an extent of Ac.3.20 gts of Pulumamidi Village, Kandukur tVlandal, Ranga Reddy District in view of L. P. Nos.309/06/HRO/H2 in Lr. D. Dis. No.1 706/2006/H RO/H2 dt.23.09.2006, L.P.Nos.312/06/HRO/H2 in Lr.D.Dis.No.1701l2jOGlHROll2 d| 23.09.2006 and L.P.Nos.315/06/HRO/H2 in Lr.D.Dis.No.1696/2006/HRO/H2 dt.25.09.2006 and by considering the Petilioners representations dt.03-07.2025. Counsel forthe Petitioners: SRI PADALA PRAVIN KUMAR Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOll REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER , HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE IC LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.22573 OF 2025 ORALORDER Heard Mr. Padala Pravin Kumar, leamed counsel for the petitioners and Mr. L. Ravinder, leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalfofthe respondents.

2. According to the petitioners, petitioner Nos.l and 2 are Lhe absolute owners and possessors of open plots bearing Nos.48 and 26, admeasuring 400 and 200 square yards in Survey No.93i1, situated Pulumamidi Vilatge and Grampanchayat, Kandukur Mandal, Rangareddy District, on the strength of registered sale deeds bearing document Nos.4500 of 2020 and 5164 of 2009, dated 20.02-2020 and

16.11.2009, respectively. Petitioner No.1 is the absolute owner and lrossessor of open plots bearing Nos.7, 15, 17 ,, 19, 40' 42, 44, 16' 18,41,43 and 45, admeasuring 200 square yards each and Plot Nos.8, 20, 36,39 and 46, admeasuring 400 square yards each in the aforesaid survey number. He is also owner of some other plots as mentioned in paragraph No.5 of writ affidavit.

3. According to the petitioners, their Vendors' Vendors, Mr' Awad Shaik and others represented by their GPA holder, IWs. Sri 2 KI.J W P No 22571 of2025 Venkateswara Estates, purchased the land to an extent of Acs. 15.00 guntas in Suney No.93li of Pulumamidi Village of Ka'rdukur Mandal in the ycar 2006. They have obtained a layout from DTCP and has developed the said land into open plots. In proof of the samc. they have fited copies of conversion proceedings, lay out. sale deeds. old pattadar passbooks and title deeds and photographs etc. Even then, the names of original owners of the properly who soltL the alorcsaid property to Mr. Awad Shaik & others representctl by M/s. Sri Venkatcswara Estates are continuing in revenue rcr:ords. Taking advantage of the same, the original owners are trying to alienate the property to third parties. Therefore, the petitioners rave submitted represcntatior dated 03.07.2025 to respondent Nos-2 to 4 rvith a request to delcte the names of original owners from revenue record. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said rcprcscntation. respondent Nos.2 to 4 did not act upon the same. A1;grieved by the said inaction of respondcnt Nos.2 to 4, the petitioners liled the present writ petition.

4. In 1act, the petitioners have to submit an online application with competent authority as specified in Schedu [e 'A' of the Telangana Rhu Bharati Rules, 2025, but the petitione rs are claiming 3 KL,J W.P. No 22573 of2025 that they are the owners of the aforesaid plots. Therefore, Bhu Bharati Portal will not accept their request. Thus, respondent Nos.2 and 4 have to consider the said representation dated 03.07.2025 submitted by the petitioners

5. At this stage, it is relevant to note that the subject property is in Pulumamidi Village, which comes under Kandukur Mandal, but not under Maheshwaram Mandal. Therefore, the petitioners have to submit representation to the Tahsildar, Kandukur Mandal.

6. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, this writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioners to submit a representation to the Tahsildar, Kandukur Mandal within one (01) week from today, and on , I receipt of the same, the Tahsildar, Kandukur Mandal shall consider and dispose of the same within thirty (30) days from the date of submission of the said representation. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein shall also consider and dispose of the representation dated 03 .07 .2025 submitted by the petitioners strictly in accordance with law by putting the petitioners and original owners of the land and also IWs. Sri Venkateshwara Estates and all interested parties on notice and affording them an opportunity. However, they shall complete the entire exercise within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt ofcopy 4 KL,J Ur P. No 22571012025 (-\ of this order. Till then, the Tahsildar, Kandukur Mandat is dirccted not to entertain any application submitted by original owners of rhe subject propertl, who sold the same to M/s. Sii \/enkateshr,r ara Estates. In the circumstances of the case, there shall bc no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any. pending in the u,rit petition shall stand closed. I I //TRUE COPY// SD,'-P. PONNA KRISHNA REGISTRAR ON OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, l\rlaheshwaram Division, Ranga Reddy District.

4. The Tahsildar, Ir/aheshwaram. [\/andal, Ranga Reddy t)istrict. 5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

6. One CC to SRI PADALA PRAVIN KUMAR, Advocate IOPUC] 7. Two CD Copies To SA LS t HIGH COURT DATED:31 10712025 ORDER WP.No.22573 of 2025 ./. | , .t. -. l1_ i' 2 g filJs 206 a* :\ (, .,: o .a/ DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. t L w