✦ High Court of India · 06 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 06 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
06 Oct 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,997 words

1 The State of Telangana, . Rep. by its Pubhc Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana. 2 Smt.Neha Nazeem, Wo.lt/ohammed Akhil Ali, Aged about 25 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H No. 19-115, Giri Nagar, Bala Nagar Hyderabad, Telangana, 500037. ...Respondents/Defacto-Complainant Cause title is amended as per Court Order Dt 16/0912025,Y,de lA No.4/2025, made in CRLP No 971412025. Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that rn the circumstances stated rn the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petrtion, the High Court may be to quash the proceedings in CC. No.7351 of 2) 12. on the file of Xlll pleas€(i Additional Judicral [/agistrate First-Class lt4edchal lValkalgri Drstrict at Kukatpally. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petitron under Section 528 of BNSS praying th:: n the crrcumstances stated In the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition. lte Hrgh Court may be pleased to grant lnterim stay all further proceedrngs, in C,l NO.7351 of 2022, on the file of Xlll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First-Cle: s Medchal ttilalkajgiri Drstrict at Kukatpally including the presence of the Accused/1 etitiotrer. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 : Smt.Neha Nazeem, Wo.Mohammed Akhil Ali, Aged ab: rt 25 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H No. 19-115, Giri Nagar, Bala Nagar l 1 lerabad. Telangana, a)00037. ... Petitioner/Defacto Complainant in I A No.2 and 3 oI 2025 AND 2 3 1 Mohammed Akhil Ali @ Mohd Aquil ali S/o lbraheenr \ged about 31 years, Occ Driver, R/o H No. 47-4611, Gurumurthy Nagar, () ,p IDPL Colony, Bala Nagar, Medchal-Malkajgiri District Hyderabad, TG, 5001 ]7 Mohammed lbrahim, S/o.Late Sabith Aii, Aged aboul ) iyears, Occ Labour, H No 47 46/1 , Gurumurthy Nagar, Opp IDPL Colonv )ala Nagar. Medchal- Ivlalkalgiri District Hyderabad, TG, 500037. llmt.Sara Begum, Wo.Md Riyaz, Aged about 42 ye: s, Occ. House wife, I1/o H No.47-4611 , Gurumurthy Nagar, Opp IDPL ( olony, Bala Nagar, IVedchal-Malkajgiri District Hyderabad, TG, 500037. Srnt.Haseena Begum, Wo.MA.Qamar Pasha, Aged z tot-tl 41 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o.H.No. 47-4611, Gurumurthy Nagar, O I r IDPL Colony. Bala Nagar. fi/ledchal-lvlalkajgiri District Hyderabad, TG, 500(). 7 Srrt.Mohsina Begum. Wo.Shareef, Aged about 38 yea-s. Occ. House wife, RJo.H No.47-4611 , Gurumurthy Nagar, Opp IDPL ( olony, Bala Nagar, lvledchal-Malkajgiri District Hyderabad, IG, 500037 5 4 ... Petitioner/Acc used Nos 'l to 5 in I / No.2 and 3 of 2025 6 the State of Telangana, , Rep. by its Public Prosecutor - gh Court for the State of Tela ngana. ...RespondenUComplainant L l No.2 and 3 of 2025 Petrtion under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that i the crrcumstances stated rn the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition. tl r High Court may be please,d to permrt the petitioner to compromise against Flr spondents/accused No 1 to 5 in CC.No.7351 of 2022 on the frle of Xlll Judrci,r Magistrate of First Class. at Kukatpally Hyderabad, by allowing the Criminal Peti i rn. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Sectron 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the terms of compromrse between the parties in C.C. No.7351 of 2021 <>n the file of Xll Judicial First Class Magistrate at Kukatpally in the rnterest of justrce. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lrilemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petrtion and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Mohammed IVlazharuddrn, Advocate for the Petitioner and Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following : COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI E O DA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/a nd CRIMINAL PETITIO N No.9714 of 2025 COMMON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accu; :d Nos.1 to 5 under Sectlon 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to r r ash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.7351 of 2022 on the f e of Xlll Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Kukatpally, Medchal,lr lalkajgiri District, registered for the alleged offences punishabl, under Sections 498-4 of the lndian penal Code, 1860 (for short . l,C') and Seclrons 3 and 4 of the Dowry prohibition Act, .,l961.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing .or petitionersiaocused Nos.1 to 5 as well as respondent No.2t,rr_. facto complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal l,etition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, | ., ,. Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed seeking permission to compo rnd the offences and to record the compromise in the abov; crime respectively.

3. The learned Additional public prosecutor has oppo s :d the said compromise petrtrons 2

4. Perused the affidavits filed by lhe de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 which disclose that she has willingly consented for compromise' Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vide orders daled 26.08.2025 passed by this Court' The Secretary' High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court' the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and theSecretaryoftheabovesaidAuthorityidentifiedthepartiesand submitted a report to that effect stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise'

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos 2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings inC.C.No.T35lot2022onthefileofXlllJudicialMagistrateofFirst Class at Kukatpally, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, registered against -t the petitioners/accu sed Nos.1 to 5, are hereby quashecl s rbject to the petitio n e r/a c cu sed Nos.1 to 5 paying an amount of i ; 5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Cor rt Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of T -. angana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only to the Telangana Bar Association, Hyderabad, within a period of tt_"ee (03) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Regrs ry.

7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stanr ;losed. s T ONNA KRISHNA /.NT REGISTRAR --7 //TRUE COPY// .Sri ITION OFFTCER To, 1 2 3 ,fu) 4 5 S VS s:r lP I] y",|-:t"trra,r r/aqrslrare Kukatpaily a the Station House Offrcer Balanagar polte Iwo CCs to the publrc prosecutor. High Cou Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to Srr [\/ohammed lVazharuddin, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copres t Prashanth Na,1 r. Cyberabad. Station, Cybere t ad District rt for the state cf Ielangana. at* (.\lottg rrith it (.r,p\ ol ,loill ( onrlrrrrrrri.r.\Jr.lno) Note : Total Amount of Rs 1O sri Mohammed rrlazharudriin counsel r"? in" p"i,t.."r as directed r . the Hon,bre Court 'rrde order dated 06 102025 r. n, SOOO/-f Five th) r ano onlv ) to the letangana Bar Assocratron Hyo",rorJ Jij nr's"boor- ( Rupee; Frve thousand only ) o the feranqana H'oh cour-r t egat servrces 6#mrttee. Hyder-. ;acr and frred Memo as proof o{complrJnce USR N; 11lglg;f ;;;; ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) h, ; been paid by -Rr"p.", -0OO/_ HIGH COURT DATED:0611012025 COMMON ORDER l.A NOs.2 and 3 ot 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.9714 of 2025 s. I t:i: ifif /a ' ,-l' ll \.,i- 't.'/r' :i.+ \ ALLOWING THE I.A NOS.2 AND 3 OF 20:i5 ANTI CRIMINAL PETITION \ 1\ -.I NTEMORANDUM OF CRIMIT\AL MISC. PI.IITION TN THI] HIGH COUR'I-FOR THE STA'I'E O['TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Crl.P.No. l.l-( o12025 CC. No. (Orr tlrc tlle of XIII .lLrdicial Ma ffi, ol:o:: gi:,'lrf,tc o1'Filsr Class. at Kukatpalll,) Bet"r'cen rVlohammed Akhil Ali S/o lbralieem, Aged about 3 l 1,ears, Occ. Driver, R/o IJ No. 4l-461 l, Gur.umurthy Nagar., Opp IDI'}t. Colony, Bala Nagar, Medchal_Malkajgiri I)istrict Hyderabad, TG, 500037. l. lVlohau.rmed lbrahirn S/o Late S:rbith Ali, Agcrl about 55 ycars, Occ: Labor., H No. 47-4611, Gurumurthy Nagar, Opp IDI,I Ciolony, Bala Nagar, rMedchal_Malkajgiri [) i:;r,ict lJ_r'dcrabad, TG, 5000i 7. ) 4 -) Srnl Sarir []egunr. W/o Md Riytr.:, Aged about 42 1c.rs, Occ: I iouse wilL, I I No. 47-46li . Gurumurthy Nagar, Opp tl)I'}L Colony. Bala Nagar, l,4edchal-Matkajgiri District til"derabad,'fG, 50003 7 Srnt Haseena Beqrrm. W/ MA e:lmar pasha, Aged about 4l years, Occ: Houser.vite, tl No. 47-46/i GurumurlhyNagar, Opp IDPL Colonv, Bala Nagar, N{edchal_Malkajgiri Disirict llvderabad, 'tG, 500037. Sntt Moltsina Bc'gurn. W/o Sir:r,..ct. y'.ged about 3g 1,ear.s, Occ: Hor,rse ivit-e,Il No. 47-46/l_ Gurumurthy Nagar., Opp IDPI- Colonv, Bala Nagar, iu{edchal_Malkajgiri District l lvdcrabad, 'fG, 500037. ;\nd l. -fhe Statc o1-'l clarrgana, Rep. by its public Prostc,-ttor, Hish Court fbr the State of Telanqa,a Petitionels/Acc r-rsed Nos l to 5

2. Srrt Neha Nazcenr, Wio Moharnntecj Akhii AIi, Aged about 25 1t:als, C)cc: i louscu ilc. Rlo H Nrr. i9-115, Giri Niigar., Bala Nagar., I ll derabad. Telangana, 5000j7. .. I{esponcien ts/Dc lacto Cornplainant t\ H Dtr tL d[- Y\1itr,c # 2 J t ar3<l JOINT CONIP IT.OMISE MEMO FTLED BY'I- B PARTIES 'Ihe pctitionels arc Accuscd in (lCNoiiSi 'of lr) I ' on the llle of XIII Judicial Magistratc o1'Filst Cllass. at Kukatpally ll-r -l :rabad, 'I he pe titio ncrs/acc used No. I to j atrcl 2ndresponcii r : herein have settle'j their disputcs rurtl cotll llro ttr ised irl the n-ratt: and the defacto compLainani has aglcecl to v, irilcitarv crinlinal c,r ;t: filed aglrinst the petitioners/acctrscd hereiu irr the best interesl ' 1' the partics The 2"'rresponclctrt subtltits that alicr liling of the abort liminal casc against thc petitio nc rsr','\cc ttsed No. I to 5. u'ith the intervc ' ion of Family elders and u'ell-rvishcrs. shc does ll()[ \\'llnt to pul'sue the :ratter and illtends'-c rvithdra$, the carsc liled b1'her',tsainst the pctitione :/accused No'1 to 5 'l-he 'nd les pontlentldetac trl '. or)lplainaut subnrit i that as the parties aor.eccl that thc criniinal cusc |!',rding against the 11,'t l ioners/accu sedt\No.l to 5. shall bc * ithdrl*'n l-,-t tl,. ]"'r rcspondent/ dc'r cto conrplainant and they are bor.rncl by thL- tculs trrr.i conditions of tl-lis ('t tnpromise Hence, the parties hercin prirl r rhrt rtris Hon'ble ( ) ut may be pleased to quash the criminal prrrcee.lings irr ('C'No.#€*6f 20:: 9n the file of Xtii Judicial Magistratc o1' First Class. t KukatpaltyHydcr'r I ad,and to pass such othcr ancl order or ortlcrs as deem tit attcl lltoper. iu tile illlt 'est ofjustice U* Petitionef No. 11A.1 p N*{*lw; tli,,\.2 il.-,- ( Pctitioner No.3iA.l . Petrtroner (). \.4 m,hsfna Petit ioricr No.5/4.-i (loLrnsel fbr s ''1 l't)- ResL-',ondcnt Ntj.2/ I)cf acto-Conrpla irtrrtt Couuse r-crrrrr.lrrirr:rrrr t l.rrna"ld \ titior-rcrs/Accirsed flrdRespondenr2, 1

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments