✦ High Court of India · 23 Oct 2025

ARSK Entreoreneur. Rep bv its Proprletor v. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 23 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
23 Oct 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,087 words

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewilh, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one rn the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the impugned Order No. RIM/JGL/JNGM- 1/ARSK/Cancellalionl2}2s-26, dated 04-06-2025 issued by the Respondent No. 5, whereby cancelling the entrepreneur of the petitioner and instructed to submrt No dues Certificate without giving opportunity as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and set-aside the impugned order dated 04-06-2025 and direct the respondents to release the petitioner's ARSK Entrepreneur. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the r ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co I I may be pleased to direct the respondents to reslore the petitioners Agros i rthu Seva Kendram (ARSK) Entrepreneur, Tharigoppula Village and Mandal, , angaon District and Seed Licence, Fertilizers Iicence and Pesticide license of 1f I petitioner, pending disposal of the marn Writ Petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary \griculture and Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner, Agriculture Department, Hyderabari 3. The District Agriculture Officer, Agriculture Department , angoan, Jangoan District.

4. The Mandal Agriculture Officer, Tharigoppula Village ar r lrilandal, Jangoan, Jangoan District ...pETrror., RS/RES,.NDENTS AND

1. ARSK Enlrepreneur, Rep by its Proprietor, G. Suresl (umar S/o Veeraiah, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Business, Fl/o H.Nrr 81/1, Main Road, Tharigoppula Village and Mandal, Jangaon District. ...RESPo .IDENT/PETITIONER

2. Telangana Agro lndustries Development Corporation Llc Rep by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Red Hills, Lakdikapo:, Hyderabad.

3. The Regional Manager, Telangana Agro lndustries Dev€ opment Corporation Ltd, Office at HIG-45, HB Colony, Jagtial, Telangana

4. The Tahsildar, Tharigoppula Village and [t/andal, Jangac r District. ...RESPONDt:l ITS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ( ,rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cour . may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 01/08/2025 in WP.NO. 12580 of 2025 and dismiss the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D.L. PANDU Respondent No.1,2,4 & 6: GP FOR AGR|Cl, -TURE & Counsel for the Respondent No.3 & 5: Ms. K. KALPANA, S( FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondent No.7: GP FOR REVENUE TELANGANA AGRCI NDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT COf PORATION LTD The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI ORDER: WRIT PETITION No.2258O oF 20.25 In this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the impugned order dated 0.4.06.2025, as illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of principles of natural justice.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Agriculture and Cooperation appearing for respondents No. 1, 2, 4 and 6, Ms.K.Kalpana, learned Standing counsel for Telangana Agro Industries Development Corporation Limited appearing for respondents No.3 and 5 and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent No.7.

3. On O1.08.2025, this Court has observed that the impugned order dated 04.06.2025 has been passed cancelling the license of the petitioner for sale of seeds, pesticides and fertilizers, without issuing any notice. which is in violation of principles of natural justice. Therefore, the impugned order was suspended and the respondents are directed to permit the petitioner for sale of fertilizers and pesticides only and shall not deal with the subsidy seeds. No counter affidavit is filed by the respondents 4 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it is now the season for supply of fert izers and pesticides to the farmers, \ \ \r!- 1 therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to :ontinue to sell fertilizers and pesticides.

5. In view of the above, this Court directs to t - at the impugned order dated 04 .06 .2025 as show cause notice an I the petitioner is permitted to submit his explanation thereto an I thereafter, the respondents are at liberty to take a decision ther: rn in accordance with law. Till such time, a decision is taken, 1r1 rrim order dated 01 .08.2025 shall continue.

6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. fhere shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if a;r', pending in this writ pel ilion sland closed. SD/- S. IALLIKARJUNA RAO z-4S ISTANT REGISTRAR I I //TRUE COPY// \\SECTTON OFFTCER ' To, of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 1 . The Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Cooperation [) 2. The Commissioner, Agriculture Department, Hyderabe t 3. The Vice Chairman and lvlanaging Director, Telanganzr Development Corporation Ltd, Red Hills, Lakdikapool, l- 4. The District Agriculture Officer, Agriculture Departmen., District.

5. The Regional lvlanager, Telangana Agro Industries Dev Ltd, Office at HIG-45, HB Colony, Jagtial, Telangana 6. The Mandal Agricutlure Officer, Tharigoppula Village a r Jangoan District.

7. The Tahsildar, Tharigoppula Village and Mandal, Jange 8. One CC to SRI D.L. PANDU, Advocate [OPUC] 9. One CC to lr/s. K. KALPANA, SC for TELANGANA AC,l DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD [OPUC]

10.Two CCs to GP FORAGRICULTURE & COOPERATI: State of Telangana. IOUTI

11. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the S z ,partment, The State \gro lndustries yderabad. Jangoan, Jangoan )lopment Corporation I lvlandal, Jangoan, >n District. .O INDUSTRIES N, High Court for the ie of Telangana.

12. Two CD Copies BN TJ HIGH COURT DATED:2311012025 ORDER WP.No.22580 of 2025 .4. i i1 'iii; ,) (-l I i iAii ?t?; .'2 aa. t Ca ....,.: ,)t,Ta DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS u u\

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments