The High Court · 2025

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution ot tnoif, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders, direction or writ more particurarry one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus a) to decrare the action of the Respondent No. t in reidciing the registration of the Petitioners document by rntimation of Refusar dated 1210212025 bearing Letter No. 1B9\2O2S as being arbitrary and illegal b) to decrare the ins*uctions issued by Respondent No.2 bearing Reference No. EClNHyZOlOZtzO2Ol3BOg dated 20.11.2024 as being arbitrary, iflegal and contrary to provision of prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, IA NO 1 0F 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 1 to register the proposed Extension of Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deed for the land and house property on PIot No.144 and 148, in Survey No.30 Part, admeasuring 925 Square Yards with House No. 1-66/MB/14A and 148, Meenakshi's Bamboos, Gachibowli, Ranga Reddy District of the Petitioner lA NO: 2 oF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation and effect of the instructions issued Respondent No. 2 bearing Refe rence No. EC I R/HY ZO I O2l 2020 I 3809 d ated 20 I 1 1 I 2021 Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI VIKRAM PooSARLA, REP.FoR SRI PRANEETHA SREERAMULA counsel for the Respondent No. 1: sMT. S. SRAVANTHI, AGP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION Counsel for the ResPondent No'2: ENFORCEMENT SRI D. NARENDAR NAIK, SC FOR a The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH IIIRIT PEIITION No.223O4 of 2O2S ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent No.l in rejecting the rcgistration of the document of the petitioner by Intimation br Renrsal vide Letter No. 1 89 /2025 dated t2.o2.202s and also the instructions issued by the rcspondent No.2 in Reference No.ECIR /HYZj / 02 /2o2o / 3so9 dated 2o.1 t.2o24 as itlegal and arbitrary.

2. Heard sri Vikram Poosarla, learnr:d Senior counsel representing Sri Praneetha Sree ramula, learped counsel for the petitioner, smt s. sravanthi, Iearned Assistant Government Pleader for stamps and Registration for the respondent No. 1 and sri l). Narendar .Naik, learned Standing Counsel for the respondcnt_ No.2.

3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.1 has issued the impugned refusal 2 , SK,J W.P.No.22304 of 2O2S order dated r2.o2-2o25 on the ground that the respondent No'2 has issued retter No.EcIR /Hyzo / 02 /2o2o / g*og dated 20.rL.2024 and in similar circumstances, this court has disposed of w.p.No.31699 of 2023 dated 03.o7.2o2s and requested to pass similar order in this writ petition by setting aside the impugned refusal order r,r,ithout reference to the letter issued by the respondent No.2. 4' on the other hand, rearned Assistant Government Pleader fr:r stamps and Regisr-ration has not disputed the submission made by the learned senior c.unser for the petitioner with regard to disposal of w.p.No.3 1699 of 2023 dated OS.O7.2O2S. 5' Learned standing counser for the respondent No.2 submits that pursuant to the interim order passed by this court in w.p.No.223o4 of 2o2s dated 0s.og.2 o2s, the respondents have registered the d.cument presented by the , / 3 SK, J W.P.No.223O4 of 2025 / petitioner €rnd in view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive. 6, The relevant portion of the order in w.p.No.31699 of 2023 dated o3.or.2o2s in para Nos.7 and g is extracted as under; "7. For better appreciation, the Standing order No.219(b) of the Registration ancl Stamps Department is extracted as follows: "s.o.219.(b) If a court restrains a pcrson from arienating a property and if he still choses to alienate it, it is he who contravenes the orders of the cotrrt and not the Registering officer. If, on the other hand, the court gives a direction to the Registering oflicer/ Registration Department, the officer/Department is estopped from going ahead with the registration.,, ?

8. In the instant case, u'ithout any notification under section 22-A of the Registrar.ion Acr, r90g, by stating that the subject property is under prohibited rist for registration or no orders as pcr standing order No.219(b), the respondent No.3 has stopped the registration of the subject document. Therefore, the impugned Memo issued by the respondent No.4-GHMC vide Lr.No.62 /DCp/cLgl \ \ I I I I i I I l 4 SK, J W.P.No.22304 of 2025 GHMC/2O21 dated 22.11.2021 to the respondent No.3 cannot be taken into account. The above finding of this Court squarely apply to the facts of the present case.

7. In view of the said submissions and following the order passed by this court in w.P.No.31699 of 2023 dated 03.07 .2025, the Writ Petition is disposed of by setting aside the lntimation of Refusal vide Letter No. 1 89 12025 dated L2.o2.2025. There shall be no order as to costs.

8. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed- //TRUE COPY/ ,) SD/. C. DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER ,?

2. Reddy District Bhavninagar, RO. (OBtRegistration and Moosapet, Balanagar, Ranga

1. Joint Sub-Registrar-ll, Ranga StamPs DePartmenl, 5-20311, Reddy District, Telangana. Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad zonal office. office at 5-1o-174,3rd Ffooi, Sn"f.ar Mayan, Basheeibagh, Hyderabad - 500 004. Rep. by its Assistant Director. one cc to sRl. slvA PRANEETHA SREERAMULA Advocate [oPUC] One CC to SRI D. NARENDAR NAIK, SC FOR ENFORCEMENT Two CCs to GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] Two CD CoPies .

5. . To, \ \ s,u.-u GJP HIGH COU DATED:1111112025 ORDER WP.No.22304 of 2025 m1 dJ t, ( t f, )a \ t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITI WITHOUT COSTS 3 t