The High Court · 2025

Ravi Kumar Narayanan, Aged about 7, Temple Road, Secretariat Colony, PA holder Mr. Sycd Afghan S/o Sy-ed Business, Rio H.No.19-3-306/2111, 0053, Telangana State ....PETITIONERS 2 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Represented Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The Director General of Police, Telang 3, The Commissioner of Police, Rachako State.

4. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, M Commissionerate, Telangana State. 5. The Assistant Commissioner of Pohce, Commissionerate, Telangana State. 6. The Station House Officer, Maheshwar Com m iss ionerate, Telangana State. its Principal Secretary Home na State a Commissionerate, Telangana heshwaram, Rachakonda aheshwaram Division, Rachakonda m Police Station, Rachakonda 7 M S E S U a ah B U S n e S S R o P Road, Hyderabad-500049, Telangana tate E Sath a n a tava n , Aged about 29 years, Occ v IV M R S d ncy, B. Satyalaxmi Nagar, Miyapur X 1 4 o N e t Petition Under Article 226 of the Co circumstances stated in the affidavit filed stitution of lndia praying that in the therewith, the High Court may be ....RESPONDENTS pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of wRlr oF MANDAlvlus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly Respondent No.5 interfering into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners over their developed plots of Joint Venture Agreement dated 1810712006 under the name and style as Rosevilla Sree priyanka Homes, in Sy.No.2, admeasuring Ac.2-01gts, situated at Dubbacherla Village and Grampanchayat, Maheshwaram [v1andal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of lndia, besides violation of thrs Honble court directions and consequently direct the Respondents more particularly Respondent No.5 not to interfere into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners over their developed plots of Joint Venture Agreement dated 1810712006 under the name and style as Rosevilla sree priyanka Homes, in Sy.No.2, admeasuring Ac.2-01gts, situated at. Dubbacherla Village and Grampanchayat, lrlaheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distnct l.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cou( may be pleased to direct the Respondents more particularly Respondent No.5 not to interfere into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over their developed Plots of Jornt Venture Agreement daled 1g/07t2006 under the name and style as "Rosevilla sree Priyanka Homes", in sy.No 2, admeasuring Ac.2-0r gts, situated at Dubbacherla Village and Grampanchayat, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI M.JAYAPAL REODy Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6 : SRI B.SRIDHAR, AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.7 : - The Court made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI E K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No. 2527 of2025 ORAL ORDER: Heard learned counsel r the petitioners and Mr.B.Sridhar, leamed Assistant overnment Pleader for Home

2. This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of respondents, more particularly, res ondent No.5 - Assistant Commissioner of Police, Maheshw am Division, Rachakonda Commissionerate, 1n interfering with the possession of petitioners over the Developed Plots of Joint Venture Agreement, dated 18.07.2006 und r the name and style of 'Rosevilla Sree Priyanka Homes', in Sy.No.2, admeasuring Acs.2.01 guntas, situated at Dubbacherla Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Rangaredd District, as illegal.

3. Mr.B.Sridhar, learned Assis t Govemment Pleader for Home, on instructions, would sub it that respondent Nos.2 to 6, more particularly, respondent No 5 never interfered with the possession of petitioners as alle ed in the writ petition. 2 . ,l Petitioners have filed writ petition vide W.P.No.22330 of 2025 seeking police protection and the same was dismissed by this Court v'ide order dated 30.07 .2025. Petitioners frled the present writ petition alleging interference of Police into the aforesaid plots pursuant to Joint Venture Agreement.

3. Perusal of the said Joint Venture Agreement would reveal that the signatures of respondent No.7 are there and tlrere is no signature of pgtitioners. In W.P.No.22330 of 2025, respondent No.7 entered appearance through her counsel and disputed her signatures on the said Joint Venture Agreement, dated 18.07.2006. Therefore, without establishing their right, petitioners can't allege that police are interfering into the said Joint Venture. In the entire writ affidavit, there are no specific allegations against the Police and the allegations are only against respondent No.7, who is a private person. Therefore, the petitioners are not entitled for any relief much less the relief sought in the present writ petition.

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly, dismissed. I / 3 Miscellaneous applications, f any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as t //TRUE C PYII SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR /- ,\ t -Y\ I' SECTION.OFFICER '1. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Co 2. One CC to SRI N/.JAYAPAL REDDY, 3. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] rt for the State of Telangana at vocate [OPUC] 6 \ To SA BS R l tlE S,4 o o ,!l 3 ETlJ 2tt25 * D6 Sr2 r 6r: (s I I t ,:, ,i HIGH COURT DATED:31 10712025 ORDER WP.No.22527 of 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. @oo;e ,fo,