High Court · 2025

3. Nlrmala Vidyalayam School, Represented-by its CorrespJn4elt^' ' ' ' Smt.Pushpaleeru, r"r*'['iinv"foi'il-a rt'riiaat' Nagarkurnool District' 4. Saraswathi Vidya Peetham School' Represented by its Principal Sri Krishna u[ffi .^i.rl?i3h,3f;3?[?t*:ftn?,1,f;,"n'n'rTff i,;;ooi,";H3',"0'o'"'' Mohan, Kalwqkurtny r oin' in-d lraihO'i' Na garku rnool D istrict' Nagarkurnool District

6. Gunda Chandrashekhar, S/o Balaswamy' aS9! Major' Occ' Business' R/ o " X;il;i;,thv'iown and uandal' Nagarkuinool District' ,P:,[h:Iff iilfl ;Y3r',,],X?,tiT',iA'"?l,H3ilboc".,Business'R/o 'fi i,1,,0""*Y*ilrT3[,t';1f fi ff 5:,:,{;e::,1,.Yfl?..63':cBusiness'Rr/o ix:*i3lfi ,il'"il,F3l3lf i?,R?3'1"ffi1*f,P?i-1iJ&"fi ;30";l""'n"" Nagarkurnool District ""ff --7 t'

10. Chimmula Shivashanker Reddv, S/o Sheshi Reddy' aged about 3.s^ye.ap.' Occ. Business, R/o. Kalwakurthy Town and Mandal, Nagarl(urnool ulstrlct l l.Chimmula Krishna Reddv, S/o. Sheshi Reddy, aged Major' Occ Business' Rlo. katwaturthy Town dnd Mandal, Nagarkurnool District

12.Smt.Maniula, Wo Jangaiah Aged about .60 years' Occ House wife' R/o' Kalwakurthy Town and-Mandal, Nagarkurnool District ' Respondents/Defeidants No. 1 to '1 1 in O'S No 19 of 2022 ' '- l3.GoliJangaReddy,S/o.GoliLaxmaReddy,aged54years,.OccAgriculture' nlo. pottiampally'Village of Vangoor Mandal, Nagarkurnool District

14.Madu Karunakar Reddy, S/o. Janga Reddy, ?ged about45 years,.Orcc. . . Hom"o boitor, R/o. Kdpakurthy Town and M-andal, Nagarkurnool District ...RESPONDENTS/ Defendants No. 13 and 14 in O'S'No' 19 ot 2022 IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 15't CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased !o STAY operation of final decree orders dated 16-03-2024 passed in l.A.No. 180 of 2023 in o.s.tto. 19 of 2022 passed by the Hon'ble Principal District Judge, Nagarkurnool District till the disposal of main CRP. IA NO:2 OF 2O24 Petition under section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to extend the interim orders passed in lA No. 1 of 2024 in CRP No. 2603 of 2024 dated 23-08-2024 till further date of adjournment or till disposal of the main cRP and pass r IA NO :3 OF 2024 Between: Neelam Ramesh, S/o. Late Neelam Kistaiah, Aged abo-ut 56 years, Occ' Employee' R/o. H.No. 8-155, Gandhinagar, Kalwakurthy Town & Mandal, Nagarkurnool u]St. , Petitioner/ Respondent No l 5Og 324 . And 1 2 J Bavandla Viiavalaxmi. Wo. Late B.Krishnaiah, Aged about 50 years' Occ' E;;;G. rli o. e-iss, Gandhi Nasar, Kalwakurthv Town and Mandal, Naiar(urnool District -509 324 Neelam Suresh, S/o. Late N.Venkatnarayana' Aged ab-out.50 years,. Occ' erpfoy"", R/o. H.No. 1-112tA, Prabhatriagar Colony, Chaitanyapuri, Hyderabad - 500 060. Nirmala Vidvalavam School, Represented by its Correspondent-. Smi.FusnpZreell, Kalwakurthy town & Mandal, Nagarkurnool District' .. RespondenU Petitioner Nagarkurnool District jho"rl N a garku rn'ool District' Moha n, Kalwaku rtny r oin' a'ni' rvr

4. Saraswathi Vidya Pe4ham School' Represented bv its Principal Sri Krishna ' EiJi!'^i;'I?i3/r3',?;R?ll?l#:ftn?,1"f;,"""rTJ'ii'i;oofi'";H?'5'o'o'"'' ' P:,[hSXf,l +'trl"iff ',n :lt,?ll:,i::,tl; :3i3''lllSil' 'P:,IX13#ff Xiil^hY:.'J,1?'[3i','iA',?f ,Xsi:bocc,Business'R/o B Gunda Manohar, t'-"r-,tfi13:ffi,:,{;3::,1,,Yfl?'dffc Business' Rr/o 9. Chimmula Bhasker.Reddy' S/o Sheshi Reddy',aged 40 vears' Occ Business KalwakurthY Town anc and Member r,lt,n'"'p'i6llitir' ilo karwarLirtnv-rown and Mandal' Nagarkurnool District occ B u si n ess' R/ o . ,oB:f $Jl?.:gt[1t"il:f, SIhYS;ii?Ti,[?i1'l-38i,?l?'Yi3l,'.3fl i'ii 11. Chimmula Krishna Reddy' S/o Sheshi Reddy' aged Maior' Occ Business' '' H);.' ii;i;il;ni ro*i"jnJrvrano jt' Naga rru rnobl D istrict 12. smt.Manjura,-*" ,3lonfl,:lAq:$:3"",'-t,,t"t"Xi3ti,3i" '"'se wire' R/o' KalwakurthY Town an ''R"J:i'Jlff Xrff,$',?fi :t"Tr',ru3,iiilJ;i'-?lr3il?iit'Bfl i,;Agricurture' "Hs*:5il:ffi T:[[:tg-:'-"' j j'?l+i5"':X'dft'"?13i"-"1#il'"'"""';'o'i3';'" .. Respondents/ Defendant No' 2 to 14 petition under section 151 cpc praying that.in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo; ; i* p"[itiol'l' iry^Iign court ntav be pleased to vacate the interim order ntll'l i"'rdir'".-i ti znz+ln cRp No' 2603 or 2024' dt' 23-08-2024 . Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI' S' KESHAVA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No'1 : SRI A' RAYI-N-?ER REDDY' SENIOR couNSEL nEpiiEb'eniiNc Cnr san'leev REDDY GILLELA counsel for the Respondeni No' 3: SRI KASU BAL REDDY The Court made the following ORDER: THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CryIL REVISION PETITI ON No.2603 of 2024 ORDER: Heard Sri S. Keshava Rao, learned counsel fbr the rcvision petitio,er, Sri A. Ravinder Reddy, leamed Senior Counsel representing Sri Sanjeev Reddy Gillella, leamed counsel for respondent No. I and Sri Kasu Bal Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.3.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is preferred aggrieved by the order dated

16.0J.2024 in I.A.No. 180 of 2023 in O.S.No. l9 of 2022 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Nagarkurnool, in compromise petition filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC. 3 The impugned order was passed by allotting land to an extent of Ac.2- i 0 guntas to the plaintiff/respondent No. I herein marked in red colour portiorr and land to an extent of Ac.2-00 guntas ,'to defendant No.1/respondent No.2 herein marked in blue colour portion, both the lands situated in Sy.No.7l of the Kalwakuthy village and mandal of Nagarkumool District.

4. 'l'o the aforesaid extent learned counsel for the parties before this court do not have any issues. The issue is only with regard to portion marked in black colour i.e., land to an extent olAc.2-10 guntas in the said survel number, which is allegedly a[otted to plaintifflrespondent No. l t I R cRP 2603-2024 herein as per the sketch map dated 26'07 '2023 shown in page No'59 of the material papers of the present Civil Revision Petition' It is hereby clarified by the learned Senior Counsel for the 5. plaintifflrespondent No.1 herein in the open Court that the black colour portion shown in the aforesaid sketch map is part of suit schedule property and rights in said property are yet to be decided' Currently' there is consensus between both the leamed counsel for defendant No'12/revision petitioner herein and leamed Senior Counsel for plaintiff/respondent No'l herein that Ac'2-00 guntas of land shown in blue colour portion is allotted to defendant No.1/respondent No'2 herein and Ac'2-10 guntas shown in red colour pottion is allotted to ptaintiff/respondent No' 1 herein' as per the compromise between the parties' The rights of the panies in the black colour portion of land to an extent of Ac'2- l0 guntas can be decided after full-fledged trial by giving atl the parlies to the suit a right to lead their evidence to establish their rights'

6.Withtheaboveclarification,thisCivitRevisionPetitionisdisposed of. There shatl be no order as to costs' Miscellaneous applications' if any' pending shall stand closed SD/- A.V.S. PRASAD DEPUTY REOISTRAR / ,/ //TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER To 1. The Principal District Judge' Nagarkurnool' 2. One CC to SRl. S KESHAVA RAO' Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRl. SANJEEV REDDY GILLELA' Advocate [OPUC] l 7 \ 4 5 kul/gh One CC to KASU BAL REDDY, Advocate (OPUC) Two CD Copies ?k HIGH COURT DATED:03/09/2025 ORDER CRP.No.2603 ot 2024 DISPOSING OF THE CIVII- REVISION PETITION (k lHU- ( /. q, TiJ o L) t I st? lIJn .l 1i ,.-.: ..i.;-..:, i-. I I ! I