L1tn,#":,":i.3'S"["'3 v. The State of Telangana, iep by its Prl secretary' ttlines and Geology
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the afuresaid direction, this urit petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. In vicw of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side and in terms of order passed by this Court in w.p.No.9605 of 2025 dated 28.03.2025, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to petitioner to approach respondent No.2…
Judgment
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated an the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaringtheactionoftherespondentsinseizingGoodsCarriage HMVvehicleNo'TSlgTAT26lofthepetitionerwithoutfollowinganyprocedure under statutes contemplated under Section 9Q Sub Section 7 of tvlinor Mineral concession Rures as being ilegar, arbitrary and against the principres of naturar justice and violative of Articles '14' 16' 19 (1) (g)' 2'l ' 300-A and 301 of Constitutionoflndiaandconsequentlydirecttherespondentstoreleasethe Goods Carriage HMV vehicle No TS 19 f A7261 of the petitioner forthwith i t 3 5l 3 q { a 5 e lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's Goods carriage HIVIV vehicle No.
TS 19 rA7261 of the petitioner forthwith pending the disposar of the above WP. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 4: AGp FoR MrNEs AND GEoLoGy Counsel for the Respondent No.2: AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3: AGp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER * $ *.'* s,* s * r s rq.* s 6 a THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.22145 of 2025 ORDER HeardlearnedcounselforthePetitioner; learncdAssistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing for respondent Nos'1 and 4; learned Assistant Government for Home appearing for respondcnt No.2 and leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent No.3. With their consent' this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself ' . 2 This writ petition is filed seeking following prayer:- Goods -seizing "to declare tle nchon of the respontlents in irrirl, ruUv aehicle i'lo'TS 19 TA 7261 of the petitioner toithout follotuing any procedure uruler statutes contenrplaterl 'unit Sution gd Sub becfion 7 of Minor Minernl t-otrrssion i<rii, ,, irii,"gilegal, arbitrary ind against the-principles of *i"irf p'irZ oni, iotaha' oi A'ti't" t1' rc' I t].)til' zt' i-ii i ,:"a 301 of Constitutioi of India and conseqtt.r.tly direct "tii 'orpo, ndrnrc Carriage HMV uclicle 'Goods b release the No.fS ig TA 7261' of the Petitioner'" 3 Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing' learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in similar circumstance this Court W.P.No.9605of2025dated28.o3.2025,passedthefollowingorder:- ,turit petition is "6. ln the liSht of the ssid discussion' this dispooed of ditectiig tlu pehtioner to app, roach 2'd respondent tt'ith nll origrnnl iy'o*1 oi *u*ittlii1 a reP"s'n*.'i.* :|?"8 'n "'p"f o1 th' ou'nersltip of tlte subiect pehicle tntl tlocuments inform the 2* n'poid'nr lhat petitioner is rendy t-o comply, 'r,!,iii"o'i'r iz "l"n' Rutes' 2b15' on receipt of the snid. representation, 2 respondent shsll consider the sante and ttispose it of in terms l7 nut' tZ of tlrc Rules' 2015 toithii n priioa o7 Qz) uteeks thereafter' ..,t 2
Operative part
With the afuresaid direction, this urit petition is disposed of. There shall be no order ns to costs. " 4 Learned counsel for the petitioner further pray this Court to pass similar orders as passed in W.p.No.9605 of 2025 dated 2g.03.2025 5 Learned Assistant Government pleader appearing for respondents did not dispute the same
In vicw of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side and in terms of order passed by this Court in w.p.No.9605 of 2025 dated 28.03.2025, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to petitioner to approach respondent No.2 by way of submitting representation along with all original documents in respect of the ownership of the subject vehicle and inform thc respondent No.2 that they are ready to comply with Rure 12 of the Rules, 2015. on receipt of the said representatioru respondent No.2 shalr consider and dispose the same in terms of Rule 12 0f the Rules, 2015, within a period of (02) weeks from the date of receipt of petitioner representation.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. SD/-P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ) //TRUE COPY// R'ff|- OlVOFFIcER SECTI To, Telangana, Hyderabad.
The Prl. Secretary, Mines and Geology Department, Secretariat, The State of 2. The station House officer, srddip^et Il rown police station, siddipet District 3. The Tahsildar, Siddipet Mandat, Siddipet District. 4. The Assistant Director of Mines and Georogy. siddipet District at siddipet. 5. One CC to Sri V. Brahmaiah Chowdary, A-iivocate'[OpUC] 6 Two CCs to GP for Mines And Geology, High Court for the'State of Telanoa na at HvdelqbgdJe.UTl 'i i I * & k Hyderabad[OUT] 7 T;; Ct to the 6P for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana, at 8. Two CC to The GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at HyderabadIOUT] 9. Two CD Copies n-^tF- TJ BS - r 5 * * p 1 *r s ri. * 5 5 t 4 t 4 ,.\ -1 F r b *I $ $ * .*t HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED:3010712025 ORDER WP.No.22145 of 202:5 IHE SI4 u r lu6 2025 * d f" DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 8+- ->) L
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the afuresaid direction, this urit petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.