The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or Order or Direction more particulariy one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly respondent No.S in threatening, compelling, continuously ca{ling and harassing the petitioners to enter into the setllement with respondent No.6, at the instance of respondent No.6, by seftling the Civil disputes pending between the petitioner No.l and respondent No.6 in respect of the PIot No.74 in Survey No.704 of Chedapalli Village, Mahabubnagar District, by interfering in the civil disputes/matters and furthermore respondent No.5 at the instance of respondent No.6, threatened the petitioners to withdraw the Writ Petition No.19582/2025' filed by the 1st petitioner before the Honourable High Court cr Telangana and that if the petitioners fails to heed to demands put forth by tlle respondent No.6, the petitioners will be implicated in false case and will be taken into illegal custody without following due process of law is bad, arbitrary, void, illegal and against the principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 19, 21 and 3004 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the responc ent No.s not to take any coercive steps and harass by calling the petitioners frequ:ntly to the police station and to withdraw the Civil Suits proceedings pending agailst the respondent No.6, by interfering in the civil disputes. lA NO: 1 OF 202s Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fihd in support of the petition, the High Ccurt may be pleased to direct the respondent No.5 not to take any coercive stelrs and harass by calling the petitioners frequently to the police station and to the Civil Suits proceedings pending against the respondent No.6, b1 interfering in the civil disputes, pending disposal of this Writ Petition. ^/ithdraw Counsel t-or the Petitioners: SRI Y.SHASHIDHAR REDD'/ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 5: SRI B.SRIDHAR, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.6: -- Tha (lnr rrt rn2.l6 tha fallaurina- r)E nED HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE IC LAIGHMAN WRIT PETITION N0.22274 0F 2025 ORALORDER: Heard Mr. Y. Shashidhar Reddy, leamed counsel for tlrc petitioners and Mr. B. Sridhar, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home appearing on behalfof respondent Nos- l to 5.

2. This writ petition is fited challenging the action of respondent No.5 in calling the petitioners to the police station and harassing them without following due procedure laid down under [aw.

3. Whereas, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit th4t petitioner No.l has filed a complaint under Section - 200 of Cr.P.C. and the same referred to Jadcherla Police Station, who in tum registered a case in Crime No.495 of 2015 for the offences punishabte under Sections - 420,465, 568,469 ard 471of IPC. The Investigating Oflicer has not completed investigation in the said crime in accordance with [aw' The Public Information Officer/Inspector of Police of Jadcherla Police Station has fumished information to the petitioner dated 19.11.2021 stating that the said crime was referred as mistake of fact on 29'05'2019 2 KIJ w.P No2?274 0f m25 a' r. enoneorsly. The said information fumished by the public Information Officer of Jadcherla police Station is fac tually incorrect.

4. Since the Investigating Officer in the szid crime has not compl,eted investigation fairly and kept intacq the liuperintendent of Police, Mahabubnagar Districg issued charge s[ eet to the then Investigating Offrcer in the subject crime, Mr. G. llalraju, presently working as Inspector of police, RGI polic.e Station, Jhamshabad. He has also appointed Mr. Kamalakaq Inspector of police, as Investigating Officer in the said crime. He has completed investigation and he is gourg to file charge sheet ;hortly. For the purpose of investigation, he has called the petitiorer and he never hoE..-l rri .lriiTrj rr1€ periilonci as alleBed m ihe wrii aiiiciavit. The copies of -^r:.:^-^- ^^ -t,- rL- said letter- memorandum of charge and statement cf imputation are placed on record.

5. In the light of the above submissions, thi: writ petition is disposed of directing the Investigating Officer in C rime No.495 of 2015 of Jadcherla Police Station to complete invesrigation and lay charge sheet. He shall not harass the petitioners under the guise of investigagirrn. However, if any further inforamation s required from 3 KIJ W-P. No.22274 of2025 the petitioners, he can seek fiom them and the petitioners shalt co- operate with the Investigating Offrcer by fumishirg forformation as sought by him. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. B. REKHA RANI SISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To \ \ 2 3 4 5 retariate Building, BRK

1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Bhavan, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. The Director General of Police, State of Telangana Police Head Quarters, Lakdi Ka Pool, Hyderabad-sOOOo4 The Superintendilnt of Police, Mahabubnagar,.Telangana.' The Debuty Superintendent of Police, Mahabubnagar, Telangana. The Stdtion Hoi-rse Officer, Police Station Jadcheda' Jadcherla, Mahabubnaoar. Telanqana one cC to S'Rl Y.SHASHIDHAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUTI Two CD Copies 6 7 8 PSK. GJP 9' HIGH COURT DATED:3010712025 ORDER WP.No.22274 of 2025 /''r'"' :J ,_ t. ,-:" '\ 0 7 irt 2925 I ', ,i' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT GOSTS \