✦ High Court of India · 10 Feb 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 10 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
10 Feb 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,369 words

Puwada Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 50 years, Occ Business, Rl/o.H.No.2-5-52Sl4lCh2, Mothi Nagar, Khammam, Khammam District. ...PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary to Planning (lX) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 3 4 5 The District Collector, (Panchayat Raj) Khammam, Khammam District. The District Panchayatraj Engineer (PlU Division), Panchayat Raj Circle, Khammam, Khammam District. The Executive Engineer, PRI Divison, Khammam, Khammam District. The Deputy Executive Engineer, PRl, SD., Khammam, Khammam District ...RESPONDENTS . Petition undel Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated- in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the admitted bill amount i.e., 1) remaining amount to the tune of Rs.64,9341 out of Rs.5,00,0001 along with interest at the rate of 24% per annum for the work done by the petitioner i.e., CC Road from Siripuram Narsaiah (H) to Guthikonda Venkateswarlu (H) at Madduldpally village, Khammam Rural Mandal, Khammam District, 2) remaining amount to the tune of Rs.39,642i- out of Rs.5,00,000/- along with interest at the rate of 24o/o per annum for the work done by the petitioner i.e.,CC road from Kummari Tulasi (H) to Cherukupally Krishnaveni (H) at Maddulapally village, Khammam Rural Mandal, Khammam District, 3) remaining amount to the tune of Rs.39,9671- out of Rs.5,00,0001 along with interest at the rate ol 24o/o per annum for the work done by the petitioner i.e., CC Road from Dasu Mangamma (H) to Gundla Subhadra (H) at Maddulapally village, Khammam Rural mandal, Khammam District, 4) remainirl$ amount to the tune of Rs.29,014/- out of Rs.5,00,0001. al I r1 by the petitione. i. Chinna Venkata-crir remaining amol r t interest at the re t,: Road from Tella: tr Rural Mandal, Kh ar out of Rs.5,00 0(X)/ done by the petitir Siripuram Narse i;: i Khammam Districrt Rs.2,50,0001 along by the petitioner i.e Maddulapally villag, Khammam as ilk:gta agreements dat€.c : and to pass suc r r: and proper in the r;rr with interest at the rate of 24o/o per annunt frrr the work done : CC Road from R and B road to MuthyaleLmma Teqnple at village, Khammam Rural mandal. Khamrnam District, 5) t) the tune of Rs.11,2661- ou| of Rs.2.50,1.)001 along with )t 24o/o pq annum for the work done by th() petitioner i.e., CC i Appaiah house to Maszid at A/addulapally vi lage, Khammam rrnam District, 6) remaining amount to the :urre of Rs.24,250t- along with interest at the rate o'[..24o/o per annum for the works ner i.e., CC Road from Jerropothula Sargi,rmma House to House at Maddulapally village, Khammanr Rural Mandal, and 7) remaining amount to the tune rf F.s.g,1351 out of lvith interest at the rate of 24ok per annum for the works done CC road from Seelam Srinu House to Han.lman Temple at Khammam Rural mandal, Khammam Dis;trir:t, pRl Division, , arbitrary, unjust and also against the terms:rnd conditions of i.l -12-2013 and supplementary agreements d;,rted 12_11_2015 her order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit just rLrmstances of the case. l.A. NO: 2OF 201 4 ,VPMP. NO: 3732OF 2017 Petition ur c e the affidavit filed in the admitted bill an with interest at th€) remaining amounl interest at the rale r Road from Siric _rr Maddulapay 'Ade g e amount to the tu-r,: rate of 24o/o per ar Kummari Tulasi (-l Khammam Rural [t4i Rs.39,9671 out of R for the work donrt b Gundla Sutihadra Khammam Distri:, Rs.5,00,000/- alorrr; by the petitioner i e., Venkatagiri village amount to the tuno rate of 24o/o per ?rr Tellapudi Appaiah I Mandal, Khamma,r I Rs.5,00,0001 alonrt r by the petitioner i e ., Narsaiah House a: District and 7) rerra along with intere{;t . petitioner i.e., C() Section 151 CPC praying that in the circu xs.lances stated in ;:pport of the petition, the High Court may b€, pleased to pay trnt to the tune of Rs.2,17,2081- out of Rs .30,00,0001 along r ate of 24ok per annum for the works,l()n€, by me i.e., lJ : the tune of Rs.64,934t out of Rs.5,00,0110/- along with f 24o/o per annum for the work done by the pr,rtitioner i.e., CC rm Narsaiah (H) to Guthikonda Venkaterswarlu (H) at Khammam Rural Mandal, Khammam Distrir.:t,2) remaining ;f Rs.39,642l- out of Rs.5,00,0001 along with interest at the ',um for the work done by the petitioner i.e,CC road from lo Cherukupalty Krishnaveni (H) at Ma Jd rlapaliy village, ndal, Khammam District, 3) remaining amourrt to the tune of ; 5,00,0001 along with interest at the rate of i,l4% per annum r the petitioner i.e., CC Road from Dasu lr,4airgamma (H) to iH) at Maddulapally village, Khammanr Rural mandal, ,1) remaining amount to the tune of Rs.!19,0.14l- out of vith interest at the rate of 24oh per annum for the work done I3 Road from R & B road to Muthyalamma Te mple at Chinna ( hammam Rural mandal, Khammam District, 5) remaining ,1 Rs. 11,266/- out of Rs.2,50,0001 along rl,itl- interest at the trm for the work done by the petitioner i.er., CC Road from ruse to Maszid at Maddulapally village, Kl.ammam Rural ristrict, 6) remaining amount to the tune of lRs 24,250/_ out of /ith interest at the rate of 24yo per annum for the works done CC Road from Jerropothula Sangamma Hourle to Siripuram v4addulapally village, Khammam Rural [\,4iln<Jal, Khammam - ing amount to the tune of Rs.g,.l35l ou1 ol Rs.2,50,0001 t the_ rate of 24% per annum for the work,; done by the : ad from Seelam Srinu House to Hanllman Tempie at Maddulapally village, Khammam Rural mandal, Khammam District, PRI Division, Khammam immediately pending disposal of the above writ petition l.A. NO:1OF 2017(WVMP. NO: 1491 OF 2017 Between:

1. The District Collector, (Panchayat Raj) Khammam, Khammam District. 2. The District Panchayatraj Engineer (PlU Division), panchayat Raj Circle, Khammam, Khammam District.

3. The Executive Engineer, PRI Divison, Khammam, Khammam District. 4. The Deputy Executive Engineer, PRl, SD., Khammam, Khammam District ... PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS AND

1. ) Puwada Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 50 years, Occ Business, R/o.H.No.2-5-529141C112, Mothi Nagar, Khammam, Khammam District. ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary to Planning (lX) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim directions dated 02.O2.20 '1 7 passed in WPMP No. 3732 of 2017 in WP No. 3154 of 2017 and dismiss the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KARUNAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.'t: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORDER HON'EL E SRI WSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA rrrRIT PETITION No.3154 of 2OL7 ORDER: Ii hen the matter has been takr:n up for hearing, k:rrr rr:d counsel for petitioner submitted that the cause in t 1r present writ petition does not slLrt, ive for adjudication -., nd it has become infructuous. 2 r view of the same, Writ Petition is clisrrrissed as infructrLot sr No costs.

3. t-1, 'rr sequently, miscellaneous aPplir:ations pending, if irr, , in this Writ Petition, shatl stand r:1rs,:_'d SD/- K.SREERAMA MURTHY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII /.\ ^ASFISTANT \, li \ sEcr ION OFFICER

1. One CC to riif TGRUNAKAR REDDY RAvocaulOeuCl 2. Two CCs to ()l FOR FINANCE & PLANNING,High Court fo. the State of Telangana. IC,], 'I ]

3. Two CCs to OF F:OR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV, Higlh :lourt for the State of Telang; na at Hyderabad. [OUTJ Two CD Cop i<:s To, 4 KKS GJP HIGH COUFI]' DATED:1 0l0ti' 12025 ORDER WP.No.3154 <fi 2017 .4- .,- e, '/- \ r'' ' )' ( TAll: ) 2l l{'J ?[25 <s:: \l c$ v / I DISMISSING ''HE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTI. OUS WITHOUT COI}TS 1z,.)

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments