Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
1 Valluri Veera Raj S/o.Satyanarayana Murthy R/o.Allur Village Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District. 2 Valluri Srinivas S/o. Satyanarayana Murthy R/o.Allur Village Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District. AND The Sub Registrar Peddapalli, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONERS
RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent in refusing to register the sale deeds proposed to be executed by the petitioners in favour of their purchasers in respect of the lands measuring Ac 1-26 guntas and Ac 2-21 guntas respectively in Sy.No.84 situated at Allur Village, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District as illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable in law and pass. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.I.AGA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION The Court at the stage of admission made the following :
ORDER:
Operative part
Heard the learned counsel for petitioners and learned Government Pleader for respondent. The petitioners state that when they were enquiring about the market value of the lands, ad-measuring Ac.1.26 guntas and Ac.2.21 guntas, respectively, in Sy.No.84, situated at Allur village, Ramagundam Mandal, Karminagar, for executing registered sale deeds in favour of some third parties, it was informed by the respondent- authorities that they cannot register the sale deeds, since the lands in question are part of the acquisition, proposed by the Singareni Collieries Company Limited. In view of the same, the petitioners have filed this writ petition contending that the action of the respondent in not registering the sale deeds is without any basis and seek appropriate direction in this regard. Learned Government Pleader for the respondent submits that there is no notification issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, under Section 22-A(1) of the Registration Act, 1908, prohibiting the registration of the documents in respect of Survey No.84, situated in the above said village and that after issuance of such notification, the respondent can refuse to receive the documents for registration, but not otherwise. In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Pleader, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondent to receive the documents in question and register the same, as and when the petitioners presented the same for registration, if they are in order, and for any reason, the documents cannot be registered, he has to pass appropriate orders, and communicate the same to the petitioners, within two weeks from the date of presentation of such documents. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. No order as to costs. Dated:04-10-2004 GJ ________________ (A.GOPAL REDDY,J) To
The Sub Registrar, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District. Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad(OUT)
Two C.D. copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Registration Act, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 04 Oct 2004. The bench was A GOPAL REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.