Dhulipatla v. A. S. Ravi pr

ffiHi#{fl:j'#l,.:ittft$ixifir':e,,sjllT":''c}tn:ri'3:"'}':r"{;:1 ll}Hlf ff *SH*+"?",tnE:i:?{.},*i:8'iihE:fl fl ;;'iUil;;;si.s-oirector, t Svam Prasad Reddv i'B'"t#;l iu*,,mr**T#"l3hf"*i:i":tqlT,iffi.'e,tJ!3J,#'# Hii,;;ij;.i.;.h iepresented bv its Director' I svam PI tJ"l:[l't?SiJiii]: 8sJ:i,ifl"J:J"t"A:fl[.i"3,'"'no"3h"'""0:?'".?["0r,3l,"1 HYderabad "'RESP.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or Direction' more particularly' one in the nature of -l,Tl,Xff Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction and inordinate delay of the Respondents in executing and registering sare deed in respect of Frat No.B2- 106, 1 st Floor, 82 Btoc V ase, Hayath naga r r];Jli'J ffi J#,J*:: ,,",',"ff :T: being the rightfur purchasers, owners and possessors of the above frat despite receiving entire sale consideration from the petitior as beins' illegal, arbitrary apart from beins viotative .; ;";;,"":."':',:::',]1"'"* 3ooA or,n" ;".,;;;;;;"::",',:"J"il'Hfi'fTJ'::,:::: Development Agreement and the power Of Attr Respondent No.1 and 2ndr3rd Respondents on ,n."nu, direct the respondents tc ", r:::'["#;T*;#i[,#J;:ijtr pet t oners n respect Survey No.117 (part) of Tattiannaram Village, Hry"tf,nrg* ;;,,' District by receiving the Stamp du.ty and Registration charges if any payabre on registration, from the petitroner. :i il: entered into between ;;;J., Petition under Sect LA. NO :2OF 2014(WPMP NO: 14607 0F 20141 n the arr dav t,,,"o," .,iiJn':; f[il::::r]il; H;_ :: ;;:::l:: direct the respondents to No 82-106, .rst F oor, r"l"::ff':":T ":::"1: tl:^,rJ.J: ;:T,:J,.:; Tattiannaram Vi'age, Hayathnagar Mandar, Rangareddy District in favor of the Petitioners by receiving the stamp duty and Registration charges if any payabre on registration, from the petitioner in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 10F 2014(WVM P. NO:1 532 0F 20141 Between: $i#F#ti.*,,.H1rfu #ff si1.}hf .d#"s,Hfl f; :*il5:^Ii:i"r...s: AND ...PETIT]ONER

1. 2 Dhulipatla V. A. S. Ravi pr ..asad, S/o. D. Venkatappaiah, Age 41 years, Occ Advocate, 3:VlPf,1|i"t'{ji',f3, *" Dhuliparra v. A. s. Ravi prasad Age 3e years, occ a 4 5 . A co m pa nv B:l[, jE:'jrv,,3i":3:l,l3ili;];3i,i,5"?:8,]:fo.tAA:l"]'ig'F,a"o"J:ilI' r n d u p ro; e cts. Li m ted, ri lt8nlTlriS r, P,"e[fl,"- 8"fl Et 33 : fi ! j!'i''I"pi;"nt"o lt5fSE:'iEt-$tB?%'r:V:ft ';;;;-;i,abzz,a"on"'p'"J [i'[r"fi ;l,irii"'g-oG"tot, I svam Prasad Reddv lndu Eastern Province Projects Private Limited'. A Comoanv incorporated under the Companies n"t,"i6io t'j'i"g itt Ct;gisJereo otfice-at toog' ttrtou FoRruNE FIELDS, rstn PfiXEelKC"nrj-co-fotlv' Hvder?bad - 5oo o72' fiii;;ffid;.h iep'resenteo ov iG'oirector' lsvam Prasad Reddv Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented .by lts Principal Secretary' #J;iil D;p;rtr"ni nuuing*-5ih*-ui-+tt' Flo6r' L Block' secretariat' Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated intheaffidavitfiledinSupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto vacate the interim order passed in W'P NO' 1159Ot2014 dl' 17 '4 2014' Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI RAJA SHEKAR RAO SALVAJI' REP' FOR SRI W.MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the ResPondent No'1 & 4: SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP' REP. FOR GP FOR HOUSING Counsel for the Respondent No'3: SRt VIVEK JAIN CONTEMPT CASE NO:2502 oF 2015 Petition under sections 1 0 to 1 2 of contempt of courts Act 1971 praying that the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order daled 17'04-2014 followed by a further order dated 29.12.2014 in W.P.No.11590 of 2014' Between: Advocate

1. Dhulipalla V.A.S.Ravi Prasad, S/o. D. Venkatappaiah, Age 42years, occ 2. Dhulipalla Shireesha, W/o. Dhulipalla V A' S' Ravi Prasad Age 39 years' Occ Government Service Both are residing at Door No.'12-1-289, Road. No 2' Anand Nagar Colony' ei;iorigroiVilla6e, G.S.l (sR) Post, Hvderabad - 500 068 AND ...PETITIONERS ';,qySfi1,'&:,*ipqa,itiq;?fliilly[rislJrl.a+i"tsfl1lnffi M.J.Road, Nampalty, F

2. Sri I Syam prasad Reddy, Managing Director. i [: f; trj3*i"fd,:",si1;Jllr+Jil+telE{ili1Ttrr',#r,l"s'ntt"sl.:ft "J 3. Sri ISyam prasad Reglyr-?ileclor, tndu Eastern province projects private ;,,,^.g";is;i; i],i.?",H.tsf .,rfi ,*;f#j,i!i[3.fl b,$dfi Tf,ssHfi

4. Sri M. Dana Kishore, l.A.S, principal Secretarv. ( fift *g j* ffi E,i' ; ",i n s onils i t- 6it",i; J''i#:'[ Hli *l' JSI?!P"ll]l ; IA S ' chief Secretary to the Govemment, state of relangana, uyaurru#hi' [[:;Tr,;r{f,i€s per the Honbre court order dtd.23.01.201e in cc

5. Sri Shailendra Kumar .ir ...CONTEMNORS Counsel for the petitioners: SRI W.MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI C.BUCHI REDDY, SC FOR TSHB Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent No.4: ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI cADt PRAVEEN KUMAR The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.l1 590 ()F 2014 ALONG WITHCON TEMPT CASE No.2 502 oF 2015 ORAL ORDER: -#' Heard Mr. Raja Shekar Rao Salvaji' leamed counsel representing Mr. W. Murali Krishn4 learned counsel for the petitioners an<I Mr. S. Rahul Reddy, leamed Special Govemment Pleader appearing on behalf of respondent Nos' l and 4'

2. The aforesaid writ petition is filed to declare the inaction and inordinate delay of respondents in executing and registering sale deed in respect of Flat No'B2-106, l't floor' 82 Block' Indu Aranya in Survey No- 1 1 7 (Part) of Tattiannaram Village' Hayathnagar Mandal, Rangareddy District in favour of the petitioners despite receiving entire sale consideration' as illegal and for a consequential direction to respondent Nos'1 and 3 to execute andregisterthesaledeedinrespectoftheaforesaidpropertyby receiving stamp duty and registration charges'

3. Vide order dated 17'04'2014, this Court directed the respondents to take necessary steps to execute and register sale deed in favour of the petitioners in respect of the aforesaid property I \ ( 2 within a period of six (06) weeks from rhe date of receipt of copy of the said order. Since the said order was not complied with by the respondents, the petitioners filed the aforesaid Contempt Case alleging willful and deliberate violation of the said order.

4. During pendency of the said writ petition and the contempt case, the petitioners have filed a memo vzde USR No.61298 of 2025, dated, 26.06.2025 staring rhar rhe respondents have complied with the said order by executing a registered sale deed bearing document No.2602 of 2025, dared, 30.04.2025. Therefore, they sought permission to withdraw the aforesaid writ petition. The said memo is placed on record.

5. In view of the aforesaid discussion, the aforesaid Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn and consequently the aforesaid Contempt Case is also closed. In the circumstances of the case. there shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petition, if any pending in the writ petition as well as contempt case shall stand closed. sD/.K.SREERAMA MU RTHY DEPUry REG]STRAR //TRUE COPYII To, 1 . M. Danakisho re, l.A.S., Housin g Commissioner a nd Vice Ch a trman Andhra Pradesh Housing Board (Telangan a Entity), A body constit uted under the provisions of the APHB Act, '1956 H aving its Re gistered Office at Gruhakalpa, M.J.Road, Nampalty, Hyd erabad - 500 001 SECTION OFFICER !i' '$ffi",,:iJl.#,i,it$;f lb*iffi f itirti$qdiifl3l$""'[EkttF5l+ '$hi6;6fl,,;'dtffi tdFl;"+rid,bnr":8fl$iifr T',*lu.fi liii HYderabad y'ffi":'BH'::'?:JEi?!?'1i'1: Sr5f#l?,l*;f"i,'6fi i"B':''3""""Jfl -AlX*f u ,i-."H'n"ls;:,[Uliol"Tt'' l'A's'', chief secretary to the Government' state 6. One CC to SRI W'tvlURALl KRISHNA' Advocate IOPUCI 7. One CC to SRI VIVEK JAIN' Advocate [OPUCI 8. One CC to SRI VEDULA SRINIVAS' Advocate [OPUCI 9. One CC to SRI C BUCHI REDDY' SC FOR TSHB TOPUCI 10.One CC to SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR' Advocate IOPUCI " +U3"3rtsl,t&i.iJ'"t #5)Y""'"{rE sPL GP' High court ror the state or ,, +Ug[:;"t1flWmll"t +fDDY' 13.Two CCs to GP FOR HOUSING' High Court for the State of Telangana at & ,RBAN DEV' Hish court ror tt ^F, rJi^h cnr rrt for th€ GENERAL' Hish court ror the state or Hyderabad [oU I 1 ,* IUij"?+:?"S&IfIS:!3'I*tr63fl*

15.Two CD CoPies BSFYBSK I .l I HIGH COURT DATED:01 t}tt2O2S \ \ COMMON ORDER C)li dfs rr1 f(.. J ) llr-r "t' . rlJE 2025 ( \ l I I WP.No.11590 of 2014 ALONG W|TH C.C.No.25 02 of 2O1S _-1.- _-,,- ,; - DISMISSING THE W.P. CLOSING THE C.C., WITHOUT COSTS AS WTHDRAWN &