The High Court · 2025

Judgment

3. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Wanaparthy, Telangana. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Wanaparthy, Wanaparthy District. The Tahsildar, Velbor Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

4. 5. Naganna @ Dalryala Naganna, S/o Dayyala Karrenna, Aged about 45 years, Oe. Agriculture, R/o Veltoor Mllage, Peddamandadi Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

6. Harijan Laxmaiah @ Dayyala Laxmaiah, S/o Dayyala Karrenna, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, Fi/o Veltoor Village, Peddamandadi Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

7. Dayyalla Laxmanna, S/o Dayyalla Karrenna, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Agricrilture, R/o Veltoor Village, Peddamandadi Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under A(icle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the H gh court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more padicularly one in the nature of writ of M_andamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 irr not deleting the names of the respondents 5 to 7 from the revenue records in respect of agriiuftural land admeasuring Ac.0-34 gts. in Sy.No.s44lA, Ac.0-33 gts. in Sy.No.5 441,1 and Ac.0-33 gts. in Sy.No.544lA3 respectively, situated at Veltoor Viflage, peddamandadi Mandal, Wanaparthy District belongs to the petition,:rs inspite of written representation dt.2844-2o25 submitted before the respondents 2 to 4 is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable, against the principles of nat.rral justice and violative of Article 300-4 of the constitution of lndia and further dr:claie the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in mutating the names of respondents 5 to 7 in respect of agricultural land adrneasuring Ac.0-34 grts. in Sy.No.544/4, Ac.0-33 gts. in sy.No.544/1 and Ac.0-33 gts. in sy.No.544/A3 respectivr:ly, situated at Vertoor village, Peddamandadi Mandal, wanaparthy District belongs to the petitioners in the revenue records taking advanhge of the name 01 the grandfather of the petitioners as Karrenna and name of father of the respon,lents 5 to 7 as Karrenna by misrepresenting before the respondent No.4 is also illegal and arbitrary anci consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to delete the narnes of the respondents 5 to 7 from the revenue records in respect of agricultural lzrnd admeasunng Ac.0-34 gts. in Sy.No.544lA, Ac.0-33 gts. in Sy.No.S4411 and Ac.C-:t3 gts. in Sy.No.544/A3 respectively, in total Ac.2-2O gts., situated at Veltoor \/illage, peddamandadi Mandal, wanaparthy District by recording the names of thr: petitioners basing on old RoRs for the year 2015 showing the name of grandfaftrer of the petitioneri as Karrenna in column Nos. 7 and B of old RoRs/pahanies irr respect of agricultural lands in Sy.No.544 in the interest of justice lA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High oc'urt may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to delete the names of the .espondents 5 to 7 from the revenue records in respect of agricultural land admr:asuring Ac.o-34 gts. in Sy.l.Io.544/A, Ac.0-33 gts. in Sy.No.SMll and Ac.O-3li gts. in Sy.No.iqqeS respectively, in total Ac.2-2O gts., situated at Veltoor V'illage, peddamandadi Mandal, wanaparthy District by recording the names of the' pelitioners basing on old RoRs for the y ear 2o1s, the name of grandfather of the petitioners was sh-own as Karrenna in column Nos. 7 and 8 of old RORs,/t)ahanies in respect of agricultural lands in Sy.No.5zt4 in the interest of justice, pr:nding disposai of the above wril pelition Counsel for the Petitioners: 'SRl. M VISHNU VARDHAN ttEDDy Counsel for the Respondent nos.1 to 4: SRt L. RAVINDEI?, AGp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent NO.S lo7: --- The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PEf,ITION No.21858 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri L.Ravinder, lea-rned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

2. According to the petitioners, their grand-father namely 'Karrenna' was the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac.2.2O guntas in Sy.No.544/A, situated at Veltoor village, Peddamandadi Mandal, Wanaparthy District. In proof of the same, he has hled copies of pahanies lor some years. 7th respondent's father name is also 'Karrenna'. Taking advantage of the sarne, the respondents 5 to 7 obtained mutation proceedings. Basing on the sarne, they are trying to sell the said property to third parties' Therefore, they have submitted a written representation dated 28.04.2025 to the 2"d respondent with a request to delete the names of the respondents KL,J v/.P.No.2l85B of 2O2S 7 5 to 7 and mutate the names of the 1te:titioners and issue E-pattadar pass book. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said representation, the 2nd respondent did not act upon the same. Ag3rieved by the said inaction of the 2"d respond.ent, the petitioners filed the present Writ petition.

3. Whereas the learned Assistant Government Pleader lor Revenue produced vrritten instructions of the Tahsildar, Peddamandadi Marrdat. vyherein it is stated tl-rat the narrres of the respondents 5 to 7 is mentionr:d in revenue records, in respect ,:f land 1-o an extent ol O.34 gts in Sy.No.544/A, A:,0.33 gts in Sy.No.544l l, Ac.O.33 gts in Sy.No.ti,t4lA3 total admeasuring Acs.2.2O gts of Veltocr village of Peddamandadi Mandal. Old pattadar par;s; books were also issued in their name. The name of the grandfather of the petitioners was not shown in Colurnn Nos.7 and 8 of Old IiOR pahanies. The aforesaid lanrl was already KL,J W.P.No.21858 of2O25 3 transferred in the narnes of respondents 5 to 7' The said land has been converted into non-agriculture purpose from agriculture. If the petitioners aggrieved by the said entries, they have to prefer an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer' Wanaparthy under Bhubharathi Act, 2025 seeking redressal. Therefore, the petitioners cannot hle the a-re present Writ Petition. The said written instructions are placed on record.

4. As discussed supra, except stating that their grandfather was the absolute owner and possessor of the subject land, the petitioners have not filed any document, except frfing paharries for some years' Even the said pahanies also, the nzune of Naganna(Karrenna) is mentioned. With the said stray entries in pahanies for some years, petitioners cannot claim right over the said property' They have to establish their right over the subject property, and then they have to approach the revenue authorities ') \ ) KL,J Vl..r.No.2 1858 r>f 2025 4 seeking mutation of their narnes and obtain pattadar pass books. Without doing so, they cannot lile the present Writ Petition complaining non corrsiideration of written representation dated 2g.O4.2025.

5. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, petitioners ar-e not entitled foi: arr5z relief, rrnrch iess the relief sought for in the present writ petitic,.. This writ Petition is liable to be dismissed., ancl ;rccordingly dismissed. However, liberty is grant:rl to ttre petitioners to avail alternate remedy, in trccordance with law. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. One CC to SRI M VISHNU VARDHAN REDDY Advo'ca e [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the Sta e of Telangana. SD/- L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ '\, , r rIiECTION OFFICER \i /- touTI

3. Two CD Copies KKS LS HIGH COURT DATED:281071202s I I i i,Y. .ilt i,:,)' it,: r, ( ii -r \\ -. I\1, \,^ ORDER WP.No.21858 of 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @ tple{