Asifnagar, Hyderabad-28, T.G v. Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\ilemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the S.H.O- P.S. Narsingi, or any arresting officer to release the petitioners/ Accused No.1 to 3 on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.788 of 2025 of P S Narsingi, pending enquiry investigation and trial in the above case in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the N/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of lvl D Abubaker Bin Ahmed, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE J.SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.9432 of 2025 Order.' This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3, seeking anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), in connection with Crime No.788 of 2025 on the file of P.S. Narsingi, Cyberabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023 (for shoft 'BNS').
Heard Mr.Mohd. Abubaker Bin Ahmed, leamed counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Syed Yasar Mamoon, leamed Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent/State.
During the course of hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the offences levelled against the petitioners are punishable with an imprisonment of less than seven years
In view of the same, without going into the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 to appear before the Investigating Officer on or before 11.08.2025. On such appearance of the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 3, the Investigating Officer is directed to scrupulously follow the procedure contemplated I t 2 under Section 4l-A of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C.)/Section 35(3) of BNSS and the guidelines issued by the Apex Cowl ln Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Biharr.
It is made clear that the petitioners/accused Nos. I to 3 shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer for the investigation and make themselves available to him as and when required and also provide the information/documents as sought by him to conclude the investigation.
If the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 3 fails to cooperate with the Investigating Officer for investigation, the Investigating Officer is at liberf to take action against them in accordance with law. Subject to the above directions, the Criminal Petition is disposed 7 . of. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand closed. i ! //TRUE COPY// SD/.A.V.S.PRASAD EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 4 k S The Xlll Judicial lVlagistrate of First Class, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar f'h" Sirt6" House dfficer, Narsingi Police Station, Cyberabad On" CC to tr/d.Abubaker Bin Ahmed, Advocate (OPUC) i*o CC= to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad,(OUT) Two CD CoPies - - 6 HIGH COURT JSRJ DATED:0110812025 ORDER CRLP.No.9432 of 2025 F t11 s t,1 ? F 0UA 202 5 t:t a'r :.:::1. o * .c) -t.- i ! I I i Disposing of the Crl.P. g 1r'' I
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.