✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Cause title

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT .N.SHOBA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. T he Court made t he following : // TRUE COPY // ..... REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ }

ORAL ORDER:

Smt.G.Srichandra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Smt.N.Shobha, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition has become infrucutous. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _______________ SKM 27t h August, 2008

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments