✦ High Court of India · 13 Nov 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 13 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
13 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,156 words

2. Smt. Parvathamma, W/o. K. Chinna Narsimhulu, aged 70 years Occ' Agriculture, Rl/o. Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet District 3. Smt. Golla Kashamma, Wo. Hanmanna, Aged 75 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet District

4. Smt. Shyamallamma, Wo. Basappa, aged 55 y9{9, Occ. Agriculture, F/o' Perapalli Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet District

5. Smt.Narsingamma, W/o. l/iddemeedi Bheemappa,. aged 45 yeIIS. .gcc Agriculture,"Rl/o. Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet District 6. Smt. Gajjali Ashamma, W/o. Laxmappa, aged 58 years' Occ. Occ' Agriculturi!, Rio. Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet District- 7. Smt Pichakuntla Narsamma, W/o. Buggappa, aged 59 years, Occ' Agriculture, Perdpalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet District

8. Smt. Manemma, W/o. Mantanageri Katappa, aged 57 years Occ Agriculture, R/o. Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet District

9. Smt. Narsingamma, W/o. t\/iddemedi Hanumanth Aged 55 years, Occ' Agriculture, {/o. Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet District 10.Smt. Hanurnamma, W/o. I'rluki Kistappa, aged 77 years Occ. Agriculture, Fyo' Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet District

11. Basanth, S/o. Late Amruthamma Aged 28 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o' Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal' Narayanpet District 12- Smt. K- Laxmi, D/o. Bala Manemma Aged 47 years, Occ. Agriculture' Fl/o ' Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal' Narayanpet District 13. Golla Pedda Hanumanthu, S/o. late Buggamma Aged 60 Agriculture, Fl/o. Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayan S/o. Late Basamma, aged 45 l4.Kamsampally Narsimhulu, years, occ pet District years, occ Agriculture, Rl/o. PeraPalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet District l5.Khajipuram Pedda Hanmanna, S/o Kankanna, aged Agritulture Fl/o. Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Nara 70 years, Occ yanpet District l6.KairDuram Kashaopa., S/o. Hanumanna' aged 38 years, Occ Agriculture, F|/o Peiipalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet District

17.lVohana Chary , S/o. Late Kamalamma Aged 41 yean;. Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet Dist ct

18. Kamsanipally Narsimhulu, S/o. Buggappa, aged 45 / rars, Occ. Agriculture Rl/o. Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpe t District

19. Gajjali Laxmi, W/o. Pedda Mogulappa Aged 48 year, Occ. Agriculture Fl/o. Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet Distr ct

20. Kutali Laxmi, W/o. Bala Chowdhary Goud Aged 47 7 rars, Occ. Agrrculture R/o. Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpet Sistrict ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 J 4 6 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Prl Secretary, Panc Secretariat, Hyderabad The District Collector, (Panchayat Raj Wing) N: Na rayanpet rayat Raj Department 'ayanpet District at The District Panchayat Officer, Narayanpet Mandal, Nar ryanpet Drstrict The Tahsildar/ lt/andal Revenue Officer, Narayanpet District Perapalla Grampanchayat, Rep by its Panchayat Narayanpet Mandal. Narayanpet District Mandal, Narayanpet Secretary, Perapalla Kanagadda Sunitha, W/o Kanagadda Balaraj Aged 40 y RJo. Perapalla Village, Narayanpet mandal, Narayanpe. )ars, occ. Housewife, )istrict ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lnci , praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the ligh Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particular y one in the nature of Writ of [\/andamus, declaring the action of Respondents Nos.2 to 5 in not demolishing the illegal constructions made by the unofficia respondent no.6 in the house sites of the petitioners situated at Sy No. 64512 l) an extent of Ac.1 .24 gts of Perapalla Village, Narayanapet [t4andal, Narayanape I District which was allotted to the petitioners for 20 house sites by grant r g house site patta certificates in the year 1995 by the 4th respondent, bu. the 6th respondent illegally making the constructions in the said house sites, tlr respondents 2 to 5 are not demolished and stopped the illegal construction i by considering the representations dated 05.07 .2025 of the petitioners is highl/ illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of I rticle 14, 16,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the .r spondents 2 to 5 to demolish / stop the illegal constructions made by the 6th respondent in the petitioners house site patta lands immediately, in the interest of justice lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated an the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to Direct the respondents 2 to 5 to demolish the:illegal constructions made by the 6th respondent in the petitioners allotted house sites patta lands situated in sy No. 645/2 to an extent of Ac.1.24 gts of Perapalla Village, Narayanapet Mandal, Narayanapet District immediately by considering the representation dated 05.07.2025 of the petitioners, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI JETTY ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent No. 4 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : SRI K. PRADEEP REDDY, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondent No. 6 : --' The Court made the following: ORDER I I - THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHA! t DEVI WRIT PETITION No.21841 OF 2O2! ORDER l,earned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners desire to withdraw this writ petit on and filed a letter dated 24.O9.2025 before the Registry seekiri 1 permission of this Court to withdraw the u,rit petition stating as r nder: "Sub: Withdrowal of W.P.No.21841 of 2025-R=yRegd. That the oboue writ petition is pending before. the Hon'ble Court, pendency oJ the same, the petitiott<t s ctnd the unofrtciaL respondents are entered into comprotr ise <tnd the same is furnished to me ond requested me tf,( t u.tithdrou.t the oboue writ petition on the ground that the nt Ltter settled out of the court. Hence, I am enclosing the :ompromise petttion along uith this letter for kind perusal oj his Hon'ble Court. Hence, I request the Hon'bLe RegiStry mag \ ndlg direct the concemed section to post the aboue W.P.I o.21841 of 2O25 in tomorrotu's cause list i.e., 25.09.202! under the caption of ' u ithdrau a l'.

2. Granting permission as sought for, the \\ rit Petition is dismissed as u'ithdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs I I 1 2 Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. t- .. / H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR SSISTANT REGISTRA To, //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. OneCClo SRI JETTANJANEYULU,Advoca 2 OneCCto SRI K PRADEEP REDDY, SC FORGRAM PANCHAYAT 3. Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV, High Court for the IoPUCI State of Telangana. [OUT]

4. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana

5. Two CD Copies PVL GJP HIGH COURT DATED:1311112025 ORDER WP.No.21841 of 2025 2 l- '. t, 2ff4 t.; l-: '\:.1i \.; ,. DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS 1,Lro

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments