Shaik Lateef Saab v. The State of A.P
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU Between: CRIMINAL PETITION No. 8304 of 2011
Shaik Lateef Saab, S/o. Imam @ Imam Saab 2. Shaik Janimiya @ Jani, S/o Lateef Sahab Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 & 2 AND The State of A.P., rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad Respondent Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. A. PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Cr.No.63 of 2011 on the file of Police Station, Penpahad, Nalgonda District. The Court made the following Order: // TRUE COPY // ASSISTANT REGISTRAR for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
1. The II Additional Sessions Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet.
The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Suryapet, Nalgonda District.
The Station House Officer, Penpahad Police Station, Nalgonda District 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)
One CC to Sri. A. Prabhakar Rao, Advocate (OPUC)
One Spare copy KK HIGH COURT SGRJ DT. 19-9-2011 BAIL ORDER CRL.P.NO.8304 OF 2011 DIRECTION Drafted by: KK Drafted on: 19-9-2011 HIGH COURT SGRJ DT. 19-9-2011 BAIL ORDER CRL.P.NO.8304 OF 2011 DIRECTION
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.