✦ High Court of India · 18 Nov 2013

The High Court · 2013

Case Details High Court of India · 18 Nov 2013

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances staled in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned judgment and decree dated 18 November 2013 passed in lA No. 2211 of 2013 io OS No. 693 of 2013 on the file of the learned lll Additional Chief Judge, CCC, Hyderabad thereby vacating the attachment and releasing the securities and shares in Demate A/c No. 1205450000001810 and Demate A/c No. 1N302734-10000203 in the pendency of the present appeal in the interest of justrce. . I I I I i I lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section '1 5'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned ludgment and decree dated 26 February 2024 passed in OS No. 693 of 20.13 on the file of the learned lll Addl. Chief Judge, CCC, Hyderabad in pendency of the present appeal in the interest of justice. 4 0F 2024 Petition under Order 23 Rule 3 R/w3eclion 151 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. the High Court may be pleased to record the terms of the Compromise arrived between the Parties to lis record in the accompanied Memorandum of joint compromise. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Aadesh Varma Counsel for the Respondent: Sri M. Roop Kumar The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA c.c.c.A. No. 153 0F 2024 JUDGMENT On L4.t2.2024, the matter was settled before the Lok Adalat held at Hyderabad and an Award was passed by the Lok Adalat. In view of the same, the C.C.C.A is disposed of in terms of the Award, dated L4.L2.2024, passed by the Lok Adalat. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/. M. MANJULA PUTY REGISTRAR D ECTION OFFICER

1. The Ill Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad 2. One CC to Sri Aadesh Varma, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri IVL Roop Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies (Along with a Copy of Award of Lok Adalat) . Y7- I I I l I HIGH COURT DATED:2010112025 JUDGMENT CCCA.No.153 of 2024 { ),J I'T tr S I, 24 t.pn nfi I }J ? lica-^.,rc' * THE C.C.C.A IS DISPOSED OF IN TERMS OF THE AWARD OF LOK ADALAT G c"tq''! w T"6Yb ; I BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD' lunaer Seciiln le Jtt'" r-"gLservices Authorities Act; 1987 (Centrat Act)l Date: 14-12-2024 Present: 1. Hon'ble Justice G. Sri Devi, SER -lrn * (Foimer Judge of Hon'ble High Court lor the state olTelanqana) Chairman

2. Sri NaYakawadi Ramesh, Advocate' Member

3. Sri K.Vasanth Rao, AdYocate, , he state ol Member CCCA.No. 153 of 2024 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST O.S.No.693 of 2013 (onthef.iteofthetttaaoitriffiCiv.itCourt,At-'Hyderabad) Between:- Petitioner/De fendant Respondent/Plaint iff Ral K S 5d 5 o a P na CS) h Io e v h Ka h a Jhawar, cOc Kaman, tLcl o5 Business, v Shri oR nLct RamRa 22-6-7681770, 000 20 d 5 Jhawar, uC ts H e a5 SE e SH U ae d p Re Ht Re HIaanta h a H m q dn E u aI N 3o d v I t e s 10t n 5 ar b tL d RaKMr s F216B8 92000 d 5 am kr La oN a 5 nh &103 401, AWARD The above case between the parties having been referred for determination to the LOK ADALAT and the parties having compromised the case / matter' the fottowing Award is passed in terms of the setttement: - ThePetitioner/Defendant-RajKishoreJhawaratongwithhiscounsel Sri Basant Kumar Soni, Advocate and Respondent/ Ptai ntiff- HSE Securities and Equities Limited, represented by its officer atong with their counsel Sri M'Roop Kumar, Advocate, have appeared before the Lok Adatat' 2on-f d vt. --- Both parties agree the h enceforth they shat against each other in respect of the Suit OS Claim made therefn, and the Judgment & and Counter Ctaim shat I become finat an fut{y settted. I not have any claims whatsoever .No.693 of 2013 and the counter Decree passed on the said suit d binding on the parties and Respondent/plaintiff agrees and underta I t Hte!-l COURT LOK ADALAT r' '.i te ot1 ation of the balance amount of Rs. 1 ding this compromise tlant/petitioner/Defendant kes that subject to the ,00,000/ - paid at the time of it shatt have no objection to the fiting a copy of the Compromise with of (10) shires of 10O0each in Hyderabad d and other securities that are under f the Hon,bte lll Additional Chief Judge, on 18-11_2OB in tA.No. 2211 of 2013 in o Depository/Liquidator for release Securities and Enterprises Limite attachment by virtue of the orders City Civil Courts Hyderabad, passed OS.No. 693 of 2013.,, Accordingty, compromise is ,o^^_. , 1 :ilil,:"ff #;, #:H,":,: #:il,j: ;: "' of 2o24stand!'disposed of as per rhe rerms Consequently, the r -" of compromise as stated rllil. The parties are informed rhri .L - be refunded. brmed that the court fee, ifany, paid on the appea( shall for the above settreme, lhis award in our presenc"]t uno award' the parties and ln token of consent for tA^ -, their counser have signed ,t r. . . P-n*y \6iB f-cL &,ro ' I S'3 4"*'tj ApPe ttant (s) \ R nt (s) e I I V> Counsel QN- t\ {AqK el for the ResPon 1698 dent (s) Couns t APPe vgLld,1 4qt'u W-*) { 6c6\r18 icY. r.r. fC'/ ' \ CHAIRMAN kn^l I{Etv\BER R tee)

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments