✦ High Court of India · 12 Mar 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 12 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
12 Mar 2025
Length
3,833 words

24.Smt.Peddolla Laxmi w/o Rajeshwar, age 40 years, r/o Jagiryar (v) Bheemgar Mandal Dist. Ni.ramabad.

25. Peddolla Rajanna s/o Lasmanna, age 50 years, r/o Jagiryal (v) Bheemgal Mandal Dist. Ni::amabad.

26.Mangarapu Gurranna s/o Gurranna, age 30 years rto Jagtyal (v) Bheemgal Mandal Dist. Niz'amabad. 27 chinnolla Pedd. Gangaram s/o Kistanna, r/o Jagiryar (v) Bheemgar Mandal Dist. Nizamabac .

28.Appala Pedda Linganna s/o Linga4na, age 40 years, r/o Jagiryal (v) Bheemgal Mandal Dist. Nizamabad,

29. Karremmallu Pedda Rajanna S/o Lingdnna, 40 yrs, rlo Jagiryal (v) Bheemgal Mandal Dist. Nizamabad.

30. Lambani Kishan s/o Rajya,60 years r/p Kupkat (v).

31.Chandu s/o Rajya, age 50 years, r/o Kupkal (v)

32. Bajam Mallaiah s/o Rajamallu, age 45 years, rio Kupkal (v)

33. Bajam Pedda Mallesh s/o Maltaiah, 35 f,ears, agriculture r/o Kupkal (v).

34. Bajam Chinna Mallesh s/o lvlallaiah, 30 years, Agriculture r/o Kupkal villige

35.Gundlu Rajanna s/o Buchanna, age 60 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

36. Pendolla Bhumanna s/o rajanna, age 5p years, r/o Kupkal (v).

37. Pendola Rajanna s/o Shivanna, age 55 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

38. Borra Pedda Narsalah s/o Limbanna, ape 60,years, r/o Kupkal (v).

39. Kammerpally Pedda Linganna s/o Rajanna, age 60 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

40. Kamarpally Chinna Linganna s/o Rajanna, age 40 years, rio Kupkal (v) 4'l.Golla Raju bai w/o Bojanna, Age 35 yrs, r/o Kupkal (v).

42.Golla Bhumanna s/o lvlallaiah, age 65 fears r/o Kupkal village

43. Nakka Pedda Narsimlu s/o Rajanna, ale 70 years, r/o Kupkal.

44. Kammerpally Pedda Linganna s/o Rajapna, age 60 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

45. Kammarpally Chinna Linganna s/o Rajqnna, age 40 years, r/o Kupkal (v)

46. Bandi Sayanna s/o Rajanna, age 60 yr4rs, , r/o Kupkal (v).

47.Golla Bhumanna s/o Rajanna, age 55 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

48. Golla Ramudu s/o Rajanna, age 45 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

49. Golla Bhumanna s/o Rajanna, Age 55 l,ears, r/o Kupkat (v).

50.Golla Venkanna s/o Janganna, age Z0 [ears, r/o Kupkal (v) 5'1 . Pyatla Mallaiah s/o Mallaiah, age 60 yebrs, r/o Kupkal (v).

52. Golln Bhumanna s/o lVlallaiah, age 60 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

53. Golla Raju Bai Wo Bajanna, age 35 yegrs r/o Kupkal (v). t/z 1 ,/,/' ,/ /

54. Pyatla Rajanralla S/o Mallaiah, age 40 years r/o Kupkal (v).

55. Chintakindi Flaju s/o Ashanna, age 50 years, r/o Kupkrrl (v).

56. Nagam Bhurranna s/o Buchanna, age 55 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

57.Adpa Venkarrna s/o Gangaram, age 60 years r/o Kupkal (v).

58. Nakka Nadip Narsimha s/o Rajanna, age 60 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

59. Nakka Yarranna s/o Rajanna, age 55 years r/o Kupkal (v).

60. Bandi Sayanna s/o rajanna, age 60 years r/o Kupkal (v).

6.1. Pindi Sayanna s/o Mallaiah, age 60 years, r/o Kupkal (v)

62. Narsa reddy r;/o Raja Reddy, age 55 years, R/o Bheenrgal

63. Pendela Bhumanna s/o Rajanna, age 55 years, r/c Kupkal (v) Bheemgal Mandal, Nizarrabad District.

64. Lambani Rukmaji S/o Late Lambani Gangya, Occ. r\griculture, R/o Kupkal Village, Bheerngal lVtandal, Nizamabad District

65. Borra Pedda Bhumanna S/o Late Borra Pedda Narsaiah, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Kupkal Village, Bheemgal Mandal, Nizamabad Dislrict

66. Nakka Gangu W/o Late Nakka Yenanna, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Kupkal Village, Bheemgal Mandal, Nizamabad District

67. Golla Pedda lJarsaiah S/o Late Golla Venkanna, Occ. ,,\griculture, R/o Kupkal Village, Bheerngal Mandal, Nizamabad District

68. Golla Pendyala Pedamallu S/o Late Golla Ramulu, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Kupkal Village, Bheemgal Mandal, Nizamabad District

69. Nakka Karrenna Wo Late Nakka Nadipi Narasimha, Occ: Agnculture, R/o Kupkal Village. Bheemgal Mandal. Nizamabad District TO Adya Ramulu S/o Late Adya Venkanna, Occ: Agricultu-e R/o Kupkal Village, Bheemgal Marrdal, Nizamabad District

71.Pyatla Gangalhar S/o Late Pytla Mallaiah, Occ: Agrriculture, R/o Kupkal Village, Bheenrgal Mandal, Nizamabad District T2.Karremallu M;rllu Wo Karremallu Pedda Rajanna, C cc. House Wife, R/o Kupkal Village Bheemgal Mandal, Nizamabad District

73. Sarojana W/o Shyam Rao, Occ: Housewife, R/o Kupkal Village, Bheemgal Mandal, Nizamabad District ,,,, /,/ t/ RR 64 to 73 are brought on record as LR's of deceased RR-15, 38, 59' 50' 48, 58, 57, 51,29, 16 as per court order dated 25.3.08 in I-AASMP's' 247 t08, 248t08, 249108,253/08, 2s4l08, 255108, 255/08. 257108 & 258/08. 74. Nakka Pedda Bhumanna S/o Late p[oaa Narsimhlu, age 40 years, R/o Kupkal

75. Smt. P. Laxmi Wio Late Narsa Reddy], age 60 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o Kupkal

76. Kondra Shakunthala Wo Late Kondra f',larayana, age 65 yrs, Housewife, R/o Kupkal

77.Kondra Ashok S/o Late Kondra Narayaqa, age 39 years, Agriculture

78.Smt. Appala Laxmi W/o Late Pedda Linganna, age 50 years, Housewife, R/o Jangiryal All are R/o Bheemgal Mandal, Nizamabad

79. Smt. Sulochana Wo Late T- Raja Repdy age 65 yrs, Occ: Housewtfe, R/o Subhashnagar, Nizamabad.

80.T. Nageshwar Reddy S/o Late T. Raja Reddy, age 50, Occ: Medical Officer, R/o Subhashnagar, Nizamabad

81. Smt. Shashikala Wo M. Janardhan Rqddy, Age 45 yrs, Occ. Household, R/o Bharkatpura, Hyderabad

82.Smt. M. Bharathi Wo M. Jagadeeshwar Reddy, age 43 yrs, Occ: Housewife, R/o Dilsuknagar, Hyderabad

83.Smt. A. Swaroopa Wo A. Bhoom Reddy, Age 41 yrs, Occ: Household, R/o Ramanthapur, Hyderabad

84. Smt. T. Vijaya Wo Kishan Reddy, age 38 years, Occ: Household, Rio Narayanguda, Hyderabad 85- Peddolla Narsu Wo late Peddolla Rajanna, age 50 yrs, Occ: housewife, R/o Jangiryal (V), Bheemgal Mandal, Nizamabad District. Respondents 74 to 85 are brought oh record as L.Rs of deceased 43, 62, 8,28, 2 & 14 and 21 & 25 as per Court order dated 14.9.09 in LAASMPs. 806, 807, 809, 823 to 825/09. ...RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 1 OF 2007(LAASMP. NO: 313 OF 2007) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitioh, the High Court may be pleased To .iinl a -r7 I grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the decrt;e and judgment made in OPNO.825/199[ dated OBl0Bl2002 on the file of the Addl. District Judge, Nizamabad includirrg execution therefore in EP NO.2/20011 on the file of the said court, pending disp:sal of the above appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: The Advocate General Counsel for the Respondents 64 to 85: Sri V. Ravi Kiran Rao The Court delivererl the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT.IUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA A.S.No.3227 OF 2004 IUDGMENT: (l'er I Ion'ble Sri Justice Abhinan{ Kuntar Shavrli) This appeal, under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act'), is filed by the Land Acquisition Officer aggrieved by the order and decree, dated

08.08.2002, passed in O.P.No.825 of 1998 b), tl-r" learned Additional District Judge, Nizamabad (for short, 'the reference Court').

2. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader attached to the office of the learned Advocate Gcneral appearing for the appellant ancl Sri V. Ravi Kiran Rao, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.64 to 8Q.

3. Learned Assistant Gorr".r-rr-r-r"It Pleader appearing for the appellant had contended that land admeasuring Ac.32-18 guntas situated at lagriyal and Kupkal Villages, Bheemgal Mandal, Nizamabad District, belonging to the respondents, was acquired by the appellant for construction of bund, quarries and R.F. and L.F. t i i j l I I I i I t I a\; x 2 AIiS,J & ETD,J A.S No.3227 of 2O04 Cl'rannel, purstrant to thc notification, dated 04.04 1995, issuecl under Section (1) of .,he Act, and the Lancl Acquisition Office'r was pleased to p.1ss Awalrl, clatccl 12.05.7997 , fixing tht, conrpens.rtion a t Rs.40,000/- pel acrc for wet lands arrd Rs.4,0007- per acrc for dry lands. Not satil;fiecl r,r,ith the same, the rcsponder-rl s-claimants sought referr.:nce und,:r Scction 18 of the Act for enhancement of compeusation ancl the same was nurnbered ur rLl[,ject O.P.No.825 of

1998. 'fhe refert-rrce Court, z,i/e impuglcd ordr:r clatcd 08.0U.2002, cnhanced the compensation to Rs.60,000/- per .rcle for thc' entire acquired larrcl, rvithout appreciating any of the corrtentions raised by the appellant

4. Learnecl .\ssistant Government Pleac'ler arppcaring for tl-re appellant had ftrrther contended that though tlre rt,fcrence Court has reliecl upon Ex. Al- Sale Deed, datecl 11.11.1994, of Kupkal \zillagc, wherein, Ac.0-Il0 guntas of land was solcl for Rs.20,000/-

1. (', Rs.40,000/- per acre, without there being any basis, cnhanced thc conrpensatiorr to Rs.60,000/- per acre for the acguirecl lancl. Tlre Land Acquisitic,n Officel has already awardecl compensation at ,lL. 3 AKS,J & ETD,J A.S.No.3227 of 2004 Rs.40,000/- per acre for wet lands, hpwever, the Land Acquisition Officer has awarded only Rs.4,000/- per acre for dry lands When the reference Court has relied upon Ex.A1-Sale Deed, dated '17.77.1994, it could have awarded con.rpensation uniformly to wet lands as well as clry lands at Rs.40,000/- per acre. But, the reference Court could not have enhanced the ccimpensation to Rs.60,000/- per acre for the entire acquirecl lancl. The enhancemcut of compensation to Rs.60,000/- per acre uniformiy to fhe entire acquired lancl is not supported by any material evideuce The Land Acquisition Officer has rightly awarded compensation of Rs.40,000/- per acre for wet lands. The reference Court ought to have cuhancecl the compensation in respect of dry lands also to Rs.IO,OOOT- per acre. Therefore, appropriate orders be passcd in the appeal by fixing the compensation at Rs.40,000/- per acrl uniformly for the entire land acquired by the appellant.

5. On the other hand, learned $enior Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.64 to 85 had conterlcled that tl're reference Court, takinfinto consideration the potentiality of the acquired land and the 4 AJiS,.J & E'I'D,J n. S.No.3227 oI20O4 fact that thr: leLnd acquired was abutting Manclal I{eadquarter, has rightly enhancr:d the cornpensation to Rs.60,000/- pel' acre urrifornrly for the entire iicquirecl land. Therefore, there au'e no merits in tl-re appeal and the sar.ne is liable to be dismissecl.

6. This Court, having considerecl the rival sulrmissions rnade by the lcarnecl cor nscl for the parties, is of the consiclered view that the refererrce CourL has relicd upon Ex.A1-Salc Deccl, clatcd 11 .11.7994 As pcr the said Salc Deccl, thc value of the larrcl r^'as Rs.40,000/- pcr acre. Tl'rercfor,., the referencc Court coulcl not liave enhanced the compensatiorr to Rs.60,000/- per acre for the acquirccl land. Thc. enhanccrnent of compensation to Rs.60,000/- per acrc bv thc reference Courl is without any basis. Therefore, lhat portiorr of the ordcr of the rcference Court, wherein it h.rs t trhanct cl tl-rc compt'nsation t,r Rs.60,000/- per acrc for thc entir,r;rcrluircd lancl, is set asicle. I-lowr:vcr, in the interest of justice, it wo,rlcl lrc appropriate if conrpensation is awarcled at Rs.40,000/ - per acrc uniformlv for thc entire acquired land, including the dry lands an<l accordingly, thc ffi' ) AKS,J & ETD,J A S.No.3227 of 2004 same is awarded. It is needless to state that the respondents are entitled to all statutory benefits as per the Act.

7. With the above observations/dilrectiorrs, the appeal is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Applications, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. /,TRUE COPY/' SD'. K SRINIVASA RAO / .="S'd'ir,"'* The Additional District Judge at Nizamabad' one CC to The Advocate General [OHUCI One CC to Sri V Ravi Kiran Rao' Advocate [OPUCI J 4 Tvro CD CoPies To,

2. V Il/gh I I I i i l l i I I I HIGH COUR'T DATED: 1210312025 JUDGMENT+DECREE AS.No.3227 of 2004 :5? j:l .1H',t: s TA t.^ C1 C' l l i lliE ?[25 I * . lt -" -,'.' ,^: '. y't DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL SUII' t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EAOA APPEAL SUIT NO: 3227 OF 2004 Between: The Land Aquisition Officer, (Revenu Divisional Offione) Nizamabad. ..APPELLANT/REFERRING OFFICER AND '1 . T.Nageshwar reddy s/o T.Raja Reddy, aged 40 years, occupation, Medical Practitioner r/o Kisannagar village, Balkonda Mandal.

2. T.Raja reddy s/o Limba reddy, age 65 years, Rtd. Govt.servant R/o Ztayatnagar , Armoor Mandal.

3. Sri Md.Abdul Azeem s/o M.A.Latqef, aged 65 years, ocpupation lron merchant, Eadabazar.

4. Sri [/d abdul azeem s/o Han Lapef, aged 65 years, occupation lron Merchant, Bada bazaar .

5. Parveen Begum d/o Shaik Dawood, aged 25 years, R/o Bheemgal.

6. Baddi Narayana @ Naganna, s/o Gangaram, age 60 yrs, Rio Bheemgal.

7. Mangali Narsaiah s/o Balraj, age 55 years, r/o Bheemgal. B. Kondra Narayana s/o Ramulu, age 60 years, r/o Bheemgal

9. Smt. Sheela Rani w/o Sudhakar red(y, age 31 years, occupation Household r/o Kupkal (v) Bheemgal Mandal.

10.Smt. Vakula Devi w/o Hanmanth reOOf, age. 3! years, r/o Bheemgal. '1 l.Gousia Begum D/o Md.lsak, age 25 years, r/o Bheemgal. '12. K.Jagadesh s/o K.R.Narayana rao, age 37 years, r/o Armoor road' Kanteshwar, Nizamabad. -/ 13- Smt.K.Kalavathr w/o K-R.Naruyana rao, age 55 years, r/o armoor road, ' Kanteshwar, l'Jizamabad. 'l4.T.Raja reddy s/o Limba reddy, age 65 years, tlo Zvilyatnagar, Armor Dist N izamabad. '15. Lambani Gan,lya s/o Narayana, 60 years, R/o Kupkal (v) Bheemgul Mandal Dist. Nizamabad.

16. Shyam Rao r;/o Ambadas rao, age 55 years, rlo ..agiryal (v) Bheemgal Mandal Dist. l.lizamabad '17. Kondur Buchanna S/o Mallalah, age 35 years, r/o ,lagiryal (v) Bheemgal [\Iandal Dist. Nlizamabad

18. Malluri anunth rao S/o Ajanna, age 30 years, occupation agrl. rlo Jagiryal (v) Bheemgal [Vlandal Dist. Nizamabad.

19. Bandi Narsai:rh s/o Yellaiah, age 38 years, occ.t\gril. r/o Jagiryal (v) Bheemgal Marrdal Dist. Nizamabad.

20. Peddolla Rajanna s/o Chinna Lasmanna, age 35 r/o .lagiryal (v) Bheemgal Mandal Dist. [r izamabad

21. Peddolla Rajanna s/o Lasmanna, age 50 years, r/o .lagiryal (v) Bheemgal Mandal Dist. Nizamabad. 2Z.Bhuma Goud :;/o Pedda Raja Goud age 50 years, rlo .Jagiryal (v) Bheemgal Mandal Dist. Nizamabad

23.Cheganti Rajanna s/o Linganna, age 30 years, I/andal Dist. Nizamabad. r/o . agiryal (v) Bheemgal

24.. Smt.Peddoila [-axmi w/o Rajeshwar, age 40 years, r/o .Jagiryal (v) Bheemgal Mandal Dist. N zamabad.

25. Peddolla Rajanna s/o Lasmanna, age 50 years, r/o - agiryal (v) Bheemgal Mandal Dist. N zamabao

26. Mangarapu Gu rranna s/o Gurranna, age 30 years rlo ,:agiryal (v) Bheerngal Mandal Dist. N zamabad

27. Chinnolla Pedcla Gangaram s/o Kistann a, rlo Jagiryal 'v) Bheemgal Mandal Dist. Nizamabad.

28. Appala Pedda Linganna s/o Linganna, age 40 years, r/o Jagiryal (v) Bheemgal ManCal Dist. Nizamabad.

29. Karremmallu P':dda Rajanna S/o Linganna, 40 yrs, r/o .. agiryat (v) Bheemgal Mandal Dist. Nizamabad.

30. Lambani Kisha n s/o Rajya, 60 years r/o Kupkal (v) .'7 ,.;..J :- n:rr5Ez '*'s :,/

3.1 . Chandu s/o Rajya, age 50 years, r/o Ktlpkal (v)

32. Bajam lvlallaiah s/o Rajamallu, age 45 years, r/o Kupkal (v)

33. Bajam Pedda Mallesh s/o Mallaiah, 35 Vears, agriculture r/o Kupkal (v).

34. Bajam Chinna Mallesh s/o Mallaiah, 30 years, Agriculture r/o Kupkal villige

35. Gundlu Rajanna s/o Buchanna, age 60 years, rio Kupkal (v).

36. Pendolla Bhumanna s/o rajanna, age 50 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

37. Pendola Rajanna s/o Shivanna, age 55] years, r/o Kupkal (v).

38. Borra Pedda Narsalah s/o Limbanna, age 60 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

39. Kammerpally Pedda Linganna s/o Rajanna, age 60 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

40. Kamarpally Chinna Linganna s/o Rajanna, age 40 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

41. Golla Raju bai w/o Bojanna, Age 35 yrs, r/o Kupkal (v).

42. Golla Bhumanna s/o Mallaiah, age 65 ),4ears r/o Kupkal village

43. Nakka Pedda Narsimlu s/o Rajanna, ale 70 years, r/o Kupkal.

44. Kammerpally Pedda Linganna s/o Ra.janna, age 60 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

45. Kammarpally Chinna Linganna s/o Rajanna, age 40 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

46. Bandi Sayanna s/o Rajanna, age 60 yr{rs, , r/o Kupkal (v).

47.Golla Bhumanna s/o Rajanna, age 55 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

48. Golla Ramudu s/o Rajanna, age 45 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

49. Golla Bhumanna s/o Rajanna, Age 55 dears, r/o Kupkal (v)

50. Golla Venkanna s/o Janganna, age 70 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

51. Pyatla Mallaiah s/o Mallaiah, age 60 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

52. Golln Bhumanna s/o Mallaiah, a9e 60 ypars, r/o.Kupkal (v).

53.Golla Raju Bai Wo Bajanna, age 35 years r/o Kupkal (v).

54.Pyatla Rajamalla S/o Mallaiah, age 40 years r/o Kupkal (v).

55. Chintakindi Raju s/o Ashanna, age 50 ylears, r/o Kupkal (v).

56. Nagam Bhumanna s/o Buchanna, age 55 years, r/o Kupkal (v).

57. Adpa Venkanna s/o Gangaram, age 60 years rio Kupkal (v). .?

58. Nakka Nadipi Narsimha s/o Ralanna, age 60 years, r/o Kupkal (v)

59. Nakka Yarranna s/o Rajanna, age 55 years r/o Kupkal 1v)

60. Bandi Sayanna s/o rajanna, age 60 years r/o Kupkal (v)

61. Pindi Sayanne s/o trlallaiah, age 60 years, r/o Kupkal (vt

62. Narsa reddy s.'o Rala Reddy, age 55 years, R/o Bheemqal

63.Pendela Bhurranna s/o Rajanna, age 55 years, r/o Kupkal (v) Bheemgal Itr'landal, Nizanrabad District.

64. Lambani Rukrnaji S/o Late Lambani Gangya, Occ: Agrrculture R/o Kupkal Village, Bheenrgal Mandal. Nizamabad District 65 Borra Pedda lhumanna S/o Late Borra Pedda Narsaiah, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Kupkal Village, Bheemgal [Mandal, Nizamabad District 66 Nakka Gangu W/o Late Nakka Yenanna, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Kupkal Village Bheemgal Mandal, Nizamabad District

67. Golla Pedda Narsaiah S/o Late Golla Venkannr, 9"6 7',griculture. R/o Kupkal Village, Bheenrgal [VIandal, Nizamabad District

68. Golla Pendyala Pedamallu S/o Late Golla Ramulu, Ccc. Agriculture, R/o Kupkal Village Bheemgal Mandal, Nizamabad District

69. Nakka Karrenrra W/o Late Nakka Nadipi Narasimha, Occ: Agricuiture, R/o Kupkal Village, Bheemgal Mandal, Nizamabad District

70. Adya Ramulu ri/o Late Adya Venkanna, Occ. Agricultur3, R/o Kupkal Village, Bheemgal Mar dal, Nizamabad District

71.Pyaila Gangatlhar S/o Late Pytla Mallaiah, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Kupkal Village, Bheerrgal Mandal, Nizamabad District 7 2. Karremallu Mallu Wo Karremallu Pedda Rajanna, O:c. House Wife, R/o Kupkal Village. Bheemgal ltilandal, Nizamabad District

73. Sarojana Wo Shyam Rao, Occ: Housewife, R/o Kupl:a Village, Bheemgal Mandal, Nizamabad District RR 64 to 73 are brought on record as LR's of deceased RR-15, 38, 59, 50, 48, 58, 57, 51 ,29, 16 as per court order dated 25.3.08 in LAASMP's. 247 1O8, 248tO8 249tO8, 253/08, 254108, 255t08, 256/08. 257 t08 & 258t08.

74. Nakka Pedda Bhumanna Sio Late Pedda Narsimhlu age 40 years, R/o Kupkal

75.Smt. P Kupkal Laxmi W/o Late Narsa Reddy, age 60 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o '"wy

76. Kondra Shakunthala Wo Late Kondra Narayana, age 65 yrs, Housewife, R/o Kupkal

77. Kondra Ashok S/o Late Kondra Narayana, age 39 years, Agriculture

78.Smt. Appala Laxmi Wo Late Pedda L nganna, age 50 years, Housewife, R/o Jangiryal All are R/o Bheemgal Mandal, Nizamahad

79.Smt. Sulochana Wo Late T. Raja Reddy age 65 yrs, Occ: Housewife, R/o Subhashnagar, Nizamabad.

80.T. Nageshwar Reddy S/o Late T. Raja Reddy, age 50, Occ: Medical Officer, R/o Subhashnagar, Nizamabad 8'l .Smt. Shashikala Wo M. Janardhan Reddy, Age 45 yrs, Occ: Household, R/o Bharkatpura, Hyderabad

82. Smt. t\/. Bharathi Wo M. Jagadeeshwfr Reddy, age 43 yrs, Occ: Housewife, R/o Dilsuknagar, Hyderabad

83. Smt. A. Swaroopa Wo A, Bhoom Reddy, Age 41 yrs, Occ: Household, R/o Ramanthapur, Hyderabad

84. Smt. T. Vijaya Wo Kishan Reddy, age 38 years, Occ: Household, R/o Narayanguda, Hyderabad

85. Peddolla Narsu Wo late Peddolla Rajpnna, age 50 yrs, Occ: housewife, R/o Jangiryal (V), Bheemgal Mandal, Nizanhabad District. Respondents 74 to 85 are brought oir record as L.Rs of deceased 43, 62, 8, 28, 2 & 14 and 21 & 25 as per Co{rrt order dated '14.9.09 in LAASMPs. 806, 807, 809, 823 to 825/09. ...RESPONDENTS Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Order and Decree dated 08-08-2002 passed in O.P.No- 825 of 1998, on the file of Additional District Judge at Nizamabad- This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Qourt and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of thp Advocate General for the Appellant and Sri V. Ravi Kiran Rao, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 64 to 85. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the Appeal be and hereby is disposed of; : ""-Y ./ .,/

2. That the portlon of the order of the reference Court, wherein it has enhanced the compens;rtion to Rs. 60,000/- per acre for the entire acquired land, is set aside;

3. That in the interest of justice, it would be appropriate if compensation is awarded at lis. 40,000/- per acre uniformly for the entire acquired land, including the lry lands and accordingly, the same is avrarded;

4. That it is ne€dless to state that the respondents are entitled to all statutory benefits as p€rr the Act; and

5. That there sh;rli be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/- K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR SESKo.r,".* 'L The Additional District Judge at Nizamabad 2. Two CD Copies To, VII HIGH COURT DATED: 1210'312025 DECREE AS.No.3227 of 2004 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL SUI'T ) 4

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments