The High Court · 2025

Prosecutor. Telangana High Court, Hyderabad. _by Station House Officer. Through public

2. Sri Sye_d 9[qbbir, S/o. Syed Zahoor, Aged 21 years, Occ Furniture Work, R/o. H.No.12-2-386/191/1, Saber Nagar-,,Jhirra, Hyderabad. ...Respondents Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praytng that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the Hrgh Court may be pleased to call for the records in connection with of SC No. 166 of 2023 pending on the file of the Second Additional Sessions Judge, at Nampally, Hyderabad, and quash the same against the petitioner to meet the interest of Justice. l.A. NO: 2OF 2024 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petitron, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in of SC.No 166 of 2023 pending on the file of the Second Additionat Sessions Judge, at Nampa y, Hyderabad,, pending disposal of the main criminal petition. 4t l.A. NO: 3 OF 2024 Between: Sri Syed Shabbir, S/o. Syed Zahoor, Aged 21 years, O: Furniture Work, R/o H.No.12-2-386/191/1. Saber Nagar-. ,Jhirra. Hyderaba i ...Petitioner/Complainant in . \.No.3 and 4 of 2025 AND

1. The State of Telangana. rep. by Station House Officer, 1 rrough Public Prosecutor Telangana High Court, Hyderabad. ...RespondenURespondent in 1., ,.No.3 and 4 of 2025

2. Syed lrfan Ahmed, S/o. Syeed Ahmed Ali, Age 24 yea s, Occ Kirana Store, Occ Business, R/o. H.No. 12-2-38611811A, Sr cer Nagar, Jhira. Tappachabutra, Hyderabad. ...Respondents/Accused in 1., ..No.3 and 4 of 201 5 Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that I the circumstances stated in the [/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to compound the ofl€ rce and quash the proceedings in connection with the S.C.No.166/2023 pen(ii rg on the file the Additional Metropolitan Session Judge, at Nampally, Hydera t ad. l.A. NO:4OF 2024 Petrtion under Section 359 ( ) of BNSS praying that irthe crrcumstances stated rn the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition he High Court may be pleased to Record Compromise for compounding the olf .nce and quash the proceedings in connection with the C.C.No.166/2023 penci g on the file the Additronal Metropolrtan Session Judge, at Nampally, Hyderab td. This Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing t e Memorandum of Grounds of Crimrnal Petition and upon hearing the argurt ,nts of Srr MANOJ KUMAR AKULA, Advocate for the Petitioner and the rrr D.Arun Kumar. Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Responder No 1, and of Srr Bargela Ravr Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADISRIDEVI l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ot 2024 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.9458 ot 2024 oSTH DECEMBER, 2025 Between: Syed lrfan Ahmed . Petitioner AND The State of Telangana Rep. through Public Prosecutor and 1 other Respondents COMMONORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceeding against him in S.C.No.166 of 2023 pending on the file of ll Additional Sessions Judge, at Nampally, Hyderabad for the offences under Section 307 of lndian Penal Code and section 25(1 ) (B) of Arms Act-1959.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise behveen them and to compound the offences \ I

1. -! i 2

3. Vide order dated 17..1 1.2025, this Court dir rcted the parties along with their respective counsel to app rar before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for iderl fication and to submit a report.

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issur: I by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, ll 3h Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties a rd submitted a report, dated 25.11.2025 and the same is placed : I record.

5. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 20 :5 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is allo,red and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in S.C, Jo.166 of 2023 pending on the file of ll Additional Sessions Judgrr , at Nampally, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed. lliscellaneous applications, if any pendinr , shall stand closed To, --..-)SD/- I .C.SULEKHA DEVI TANT REGTSTRAR 4SSrS \' \ ;ECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY//

1. The ll Additional Sesstons Judge, at Nampally. 2. The Station House Officer, Tappachabutra police Station lyderabad City. 3 Two CCs to the Public prosecutor, Hrgh Court for the Stat{ of Telangana at Hyderabad IOUT] 4 One CC to SRI MANOJ KUMAR AKULA, Advocate [Opt, )] 5. One CC to SRI BARGELA RAV| KUMAR, Advocate [Op[,( :] 6 Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:08112t2025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ot 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.9458 of 2024 I {E SIa ( o(.) 0 i .lili ?.2r -,\ + .,'/ ,... ',, ) ..;, ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL AND l.A.Nosi 3 AND 4 OF 2025 MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL PETITION (Under Secticn 4B2 of Cr.p.C.) { I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD crt.p. No. 1\ ft of 2oz4 AGAINST S.C.No. 166 of2023 ON THE FILE OF SECOND ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSION JUDGE, Hyderabad District. Between: Syed lrfan Ahmed S/o. Syeed Ahmed Ali, Age24 years, Occ; Kirana Store, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 12_2_iS6t1S1tA, Saber Nagar, Jhira, Tappachabutra, HVJ"ilOrO. And . Petitioner /Accused

1. The State of Telangana rep. by Station House Officer, Through Public prosecutor, Telangan, H,ShLorrt, Hyderabad.

2. Sri Syed Shabbir, S/o. Syed Zahoor, Aged 21 years, Occ: Furniture Work, R/o. H. No. 1 2-Z-386t 19 1 t l,Saber Nag;ar, Jhirra, Hyderabad. JOINT MEMO FIL ED BY TH E BOTH PA RTIES . Respondents 1 That the petitioners/accused A.l & A2 and the respondent No. 2 have compromised the matter out of the court with the intervention of victim, elders, and weil-wishers, and the respondent No,2/comprainant have No objections for quashing the proceedings in case in F.l.R.No. 241 of 2o1B for the offences punishable u/s 49g-A, 406, 506 lpl and section O * U o1r€*f Dowry Prohibition Act. Thereafter, the police had f I :d charge sheet vide c'c.No. 6336 of 201g pending on the fire of the - on,bre XV Additionar Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hy,j :rabad, against the petitioners for the offences punishabre under sectiorr 49g-A, 406, so6 rpc and section 4 & 6 of Dowry prohibition Act. 2 That due to intervention of erders of both the parties i nd we, wishers, the matter had been setfled amicabry and entered into a ;ompromise and the 2nd reSpondent agreed to withdraw the case in C.C.\ o. 6336 of 201g, on the following terms and condition ,n",&l,#fik;"., a>|an), Second?arty l, 2nnRes pondent Couns the First Party Counsel T for th, S eco ) Party.