✦ High Court of India · 07 Jan 2025

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E v. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos

Case Details High Court of India · 07 Jan 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Judgment daled 4-10-2016 in CC.No.311 ol 2015 on the file of the lll Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad confirming in CC.No. 312015 on the file of the XXV Special Magistrate, Hyderabad. cRL.R.C.NO.3038 0F 20'16 : Crt.R.C. udersections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C against the Judgment made in Crl.A.No.312 ot 20'15 dated 04.1O.2016 on the file of the Court of the lll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad. I CRL.R.C.M.P. NO:4731 0F 2016 in CRL.R.C .No.3038 of 2016 Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the Judgment dated 4-10-2016 in cc.No.312 of 2o1s on the file of the ilt Addl. Metropolitan sessions Judge at Hyderabad confirming in cc.No. 4r2o1s on the file of the XXV Special Magistrate, Hyderabad Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl. M.RAMALTNGESHWAR REDDy Counsel for the Respondent No..l : pUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Sri MADDELA RAVINDER CRL.R.C.NO:'tl 79 0F 20.t9 crl.R.c.undersections 397 & 4ol of cr.p.c against the Judgment made in crl.A.No'38l of 2017 dated 21.08.2019 on the fire of the court of the rv Additional Metropolitan sessions Judge at Hyderabad preferred against the order made in c.c.No.30 ot 2o13 (ord c.c.No.270 of 2013) dated 02.03.2017 on the file of the Court of the )(XV Special Magistrate, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2019 lN CRL.R.C.No. 1179 ot 2019 Petiti on under Section 482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Judgment in crr.A.No. 3g5 of 2017, dated 21-08-2019 passed by the court of rV Addr. Metroporitan sessions Judge, Hyderabad, confirming the conviction and modifying the sentence passed in New cc No. 30 of 2013 (ord c c. No. 270 of 2013) dated 02-03-2017 passed by the Court of XXV Special Magistrate, Hyderabad to pay a fine of Rs. 1O,2S,OOO!_ (Rupees Ten Lakhs Twenty Five Thousand onry) and in defaurt of payment of fine, the petitloner No.2 shall suffer simple imprisonment for six (6) months. CRL.R.C.N o: 1180 OF 2019 crl.R.cundersections 397 & 4ol of cr.p.c against the Judgment made in crl.A.No.384 ot 2017 dated 21.08.2019 on the fire of the court of the rv Additional Metropotitan sessidns Judge at Hyderabad preferred against the order made in c.c.No.9l of 2013 (ord c.c.No.466 of 2013) dated 02.03.2017 on the file of the Court of the XXV Special Magistrate, Hyderabad. tF- lA NO: 2 OF 2019 lN CRL.R.C.No.1l80 of 2019 Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Judgment in Crl.A.No. 384 of 2O17, daled 21-08-2019 passed by the Court of lV Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, confirming the conviction and modifying the sentence passed in New CC No. 91 of 2013 (Old C.C. No. 466 of 2013) dated 02-03-2017 passed by the Court of XXV Special Magistrate, Hyderabad to pay a' fine of Rs. 26,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Six Lakhs only) and in default of payment of fine, the petitioner No.2 shall suffer simple imprisonment for sixteen (16) months. COMMON C.T. lN CRL.R.C.No.1179 and 1180 of 2019 : Between:

1. M/s. Balaji Textile Mills, Rep. by its Proprietor, G. Satyanarayana, S/o. G. Mallaiah, 41, 1st Floor, R.J. Market, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad - 500 002.

2. G. Satyanarayana, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged 70 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Flat No. 101, Manish Residency, Bhanu Nagar, Champapet, Hyderabad. ...REV.PETITIONERS/APPELLANT/ACCUSED AND

1. N.Janardhan Rao, R/o. N. Narayana, Aged 60 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Plot No. 106/4, Motinagar, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT 2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of relangana' Hyderabad ...RES'.N,ENT Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. M.RAMALINGESWARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.l : SRI MADDELA RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING : COMMON ORDER 1 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos. 3OO4 of 2OL6, 3038 of 20L6 LL79 of2Ol9 and 1180 OF 2019 COMMON ORDER: These present Criminal Revision Cases are filed aggrieved by the judgment dated 04.10.2Ot6 ar.d 21.Oa.2019 in Criminal Appea1 Nos.311 and 312 of 2015, 385 of 2Ol7 and 384 of 2OlZ on the file of the learned III Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad and IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in confirming the judgment dated 30.03.201S and 02.03.2017 in C.C.Nos.3 and 4 of 2Ol4 and C.C.Nos.3O of \ 2013 and 91 of 2013 on the flle of the learned XXV Speciat Magistrate, Hyderabad.

2. Since the petitioner in all the revision cases are one and the same, they were heard together and disposed of by way of common order

3. Heard Mr.M.Ravinder, learned counsel for the respondent No.2, Mr.E. Ganesh, learned Assistant public prosecutor appea-ring for respondent No.1 State and perused the record. 4 . Lega-l Heir of the revision petitioner is present ald represented this Court that revision petitioner t-,." ajg{g1t,11 , ) 2 that effect, a death certihcate issued by Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Telangala State hs been furnished to this Court

5. Learned counsel for the unoffrcial respondent and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor take no objection to the same

6. Recording the submissions made by both the learned counsel ald upon pursuing the death certifrcate furnished by the legal heir of the revision petitioner, these Criminal Revision Cases are dismissed as abated Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUECOPY// SD/. M RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGlSTRAR CTION OFFICER To, 1 . The lll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad 2. The lV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad 3. The XXV Special Magistrate Erramanzil at Hyderabad 4. One CC to Sri M.Ramalingeswara Reddy , Advocate (OPUC) 5. One CC to Sri Maddela Ravinder, Advocate (OPUC) 6. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.(OUT)

7. Two CD Copies Ks/PSL w HIGH COURT DATED:07101t2025 COMMON ORDER r' rttE S t4, e (,A J o o 2 I nin ZozS ( Y ( CRLRC.No.3004 AND 3038 of 2016 AND CRL.R.C.No.1179 and 1180 of 2019 I Dr-S.At a .O Dismissing the Crl.R.Cs as abated. 1e *tct> &"

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments