K. Prasada Rao v. 1. The State of Telangana

5. Srinivasa Raiu, Working as Head Constable, Dammapeta Police Station, Dammapeta, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

6. Kaka Venkateswarlu, Son of Laxmimuthaiah, agp.d m19r B/o' Lankalapally - Vittige, Dammapeta Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District' 7, Sodem Gangaraju, Son of Ramudu' aged. maj9r,.Rl/o' Ankampalem Village' Dammapeta-Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District' S.VaooelaJanardhan,SonofKannaiah'agedmajor,Rl/o.AnkampalemVillage' Dam*mapeta Ma ndal, Bhad rad ri Kothag udem District'

9. Kusam lndira, W/o. Srirama Chandramurthy, aged maigr, Rl/o' Ankampalem - Vittig., Oiminapeta Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District' 10.Kursam Srirama Chandramurthy, Son of not known to the petitioner, aged '- i"ipt, ny". Ant<impatem Village, Dammapeta Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. 'l 1.Kaka Bharath, S/o. Veerabhadram' aged majo1, Rl/o' Ankampalem Village' Oimmapeta Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District' l2.KakaNaqeswaraRao,S/o.Pandaiah'agedmajor'Rl/o.AnkampalemVillage, - fjarmapit, Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District' Artapenta

13.Sunnam B.rileiah. Son ojlo-t.lno.wn to.the petitioner, aged mi,rior. Rl/o. ir District ,#Ji,:, n na m baft i '/irir11e, Dammapeta rr,rJnair, 'a-nliijjii<otnruude " Vl,,gg:ig'fl'l iii;[",fi j,{ff18fl:##I,("1fl ,' A,T*ll?lill ffgifr e?ff ; Hl?iJ,f ilX1ia :g#Sfi jrn3X jl,lE;i?;1i:"*fln"H, n,,", Ankampererrr

16. Kondru Jarralti Wife of Kondru Narasimha Rao, aged major, Fl/o. Dammap"ta vrrncia'i,'ei"id?XEri Kotrragr-dem District. "N:fl,n;S*,ff }ii'ry,1"r^:T.:'JXffi ,#;,l3#"Jir/oAnkamperemvi,ase, 'iilage, ..RESPONDENTS Petition unrler i\rticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia pray,ing that in the circumstances s;t:rtec in the affidavit filed therewith, the H,gh ,3ourt may be pleased to issue' er wrt, order or Direction more particurarry one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, trr:craring the action of the respondents porce particurarry respondents 3' z[ :rn'i ri in not registering the FrR basing on th e cr:mpraint of the petitioner dated 2€i 0E.201g and even though not received the sair: compraint by the 5th respondenl ()(,nstable and not to register the FIR is illr:gal arbitrary and against the principrer; naturar justice and arso vioration of Articre 1.4, 19,21 and 300-4 of constitution r f rndia incruding the Apex court Judgment Larrta Kumari vs. Government of Utt;:rr f)radesh and consequenfly direct the resrrond,-.nts police to register the FrR arrd kr take action against the respondents 6 tc .17 who are illegally trying to qrlb he petitioners property in Sy No. 32-94 (Ac :t 01 gts). 379 (Ac.0.18 gts), 379 t'A,:Cr.36 gts), 381 (Ac.0.36 gts),3[7tBt1t (N>O.2Ogts), 346/6 (Ac'2'o4 gts) ancl :14617 (Ac.1 .36 gts) total extent of Ac.13.35 gtr; situated at Ankampalem Village, Ezrmmapeta Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagude m E)istrict basing on the compraint of tler cetitioner dated 26.0g.2019 in the interest of jt;stice. IA NO: 10F 2019 Petition under Section '151 cPC praying that in the circumstanr.;es stated in the affidavit fired in sLrppc,rt of the petition, the High court may be prea,sed to direct the respondents porir;e carticurarry respondents 3, 4 and 5 porice to register the FIR basing on the periticrer compraint dated 26.0g.2019 to take a:tior against the unofficiar respondents and punish them as per raw iregary trespasr;ed into the petitioners lands in Sy No.32-9A (Ac.3.01 gts), 379 (Ac.O.18 gts). 379 (Ac'O.36 gts), 381 (Ac.0.36 gts), 307/8/2 (Ac.0.20 gts), 346/6 (Ac.2.04 gts) and 346/7 (Ac.1 .36 gts) total extent of Ac.1 3.35 gts situated at Ankampalem Village' Dammapeta Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, pending disposal of the main writ petition- Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PENUBALLI RAMESH BABU Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Gounsel for the Respondent Nos.5 lo 17i- The Court made the following: ORDER I l i rI{E HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAI:T W,P.No. 22699 of 2Ol9 ORDER The gr.ir:r:tnce of the petitioner in the present V/ri[ ]etition is that bas; nr ; ) n the complaint made by tlre ;tetil ioner on 26.O9.2O19 rl-t respondents_authorities are not initiati:1g action by registe rir,g ttre FIR against the unofficial responCenr s herein, which act-oi L r I the respondents it is contended as hig]rly illegal and arbitr:r r,'

2. Heard l:arned Counsel for the petltlorler, learnecl Governmerrl F l,:ader for Home appearing lbr the official respondenls ancL pcrused the record. I

3. Having r,l llrd to the manner of disposal of Lhe Wril petition and the natlr -e )l 1is involved, this Court is of the viey th,rt notice to unoflicia I t-e,s:ondents is not necessary for adjudicatioe of the present Writ :,r..t tion

4. Wher-r tl-rr: matter is taken up for ht:arirrg, learned Governmenr. :rlt:rL,lcr l{ome appearing for respondent Nos,.1 to 4 submils tlLa I .tr<, responden ls_authorities on re<rervir_rg the complaint rrra.:lo ry the petitioner, have made a GD ent.1r a. rd after causing prr:li,i;rtry. enquiry, closed the said cornplarnt on 26'o9.2o19 n )rir,1a tlre same as ,.civil in naturc,,; arld trlat the I I \ l i l 2 petitioner was also informed of the action taken by sending communication through Petition Management System(pMS).

5. I have taken note of the respective submissions made.

6. Having regard to the submission made as above and since, it is now stated before this Court that a communication through pMS has already been sent to the petitioner informing as to the action taken on his complaint by closing the same as "civil in nature", this Court is of the view that the grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition stands redressed. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said action taken by the respondents- authorities, it is open for the petitioner to avaii further remedies under Cr.P.C./BNSS.

7. Granting liberty as noted hereinabove, the present Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

8. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed /ITRUE COPY// SD/.N.RAJGOPAL EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, at, The State of 1 Hvd erabad Superi ntendent of Police, Bhadradri Kothagudem District at Kothagudem The Princrpal Secretary, Home DePartment' Se Tela 3. The lnsPecto r of Police, AswaraoPeta Police Station, Aswaraopeta, Bha 2. The 4. The Sta 5 One CC to Sri Penuballi Ramesh Babu, Advocate I 6 Two CCs to GP for Ho Hvd erabad [OUT] District ouse Officer, Dammapeta Police Station' Dammapeta' Kothag udem tion H Bhadrad ri Kothag udem District me, High Court for the State of Telangana, at oPucl dradri CD CoPies TJ LS 7 .,^rwo w HIGH COUR.'T DATED:2810t112025 ORDER WP.No.22699 of 2019 ,.", \t\t sr (-'.' A 14: + o o 2 f ,t ttr ZIZI o'( ,: c, .\ rC trEo '\i!' DISPOSING| C)F THE WRIT PETITION WTHOUT COSTS ,{ )-r W