The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pteased to quash the proceedings in FIR No. 909 of 2023 on the file of PS, DD, CCS, Hyderabad, against Accused Nos. 1 ,7 and 23- t.A. NO:2 OF 2025 Pet'ttion under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in FIR No. 909 of 2023 on the file of PS, DD, CCS, Hyberabad, against Accused Nos. 1 , 7 & 23 pending disposal of the above criminal petition. Al##ffier section 3s9(o) of BNSS prayins that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Leave and permit the Petitioners and respondents no. 2 to compromise and quash the proceedings in FIR No. 909 of 2OZ3 on the file of PS, DD, CCS, Hyderabad againstAccused Nos. 1,7 &23. l.A. NO:4 OF 2025 Between: Sri. Posu Sheshank, S/o Posu Praveen Kumar, Age:. 33 years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o H.No.18-3-469111112, Rajannabowli; Phool bagh Chaman, Aliabad, Hyderabad- 500053. ... Petitioner/RespondenUCom plainant AND

1. Gadhagoni Chakradhar Goud, S/o Gadhagoni Ramakrishna Goud, Age: 36 years, Occ: Owner of Farmer First Foundation, R/o Bhavya Shiri Krishna Avenue, Villa No. 10, Pragathi Nagar, Hyderabad, Also at: Flat No. 102, Plot No. 29, 30, 31, 32, Sai Park View, WC Bachupally, Nizampet, Medchal- Matkalgiri District, Tetangana- 500090 (A- 1). 2. Uppari Jagadishwar, S/o Ramulu, Age: 25 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o H.No.401 , Shravyavatika App, Somajiguda, Hyderabad also at 1-108' Ravulapally, Marpally, Ranga Reddy District - 501 106 (A- 7). 3. Chereddy Auroshika Reddy, Wo Chakradhar Goud, D/o C. Malla Reddy, Age: 28 years, Occ: Chairman at Farmer First Foundation, R/o Bhavya Shiri Krishna Avenue, Villa No. 10, Pragathi Nagar, Hyderabad, Also at H. No.5- 28t3, Buddha Nagar, Peerzadiguda, Ghatkesar, Boduppal, Ranga Reddy District' Telangana (A- 23)' ...Respondents/petitioners 4. The State of Telangana, Represented by the Public Prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad. ...RespondenURespondent Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitlon, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings in FIR No. 909 of 2023 on the file of PS, DD, CCS, Hyderabad, against Accused Nos. 1 ,7 &23. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S. Ram Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri C. SunilAnand, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.9217 of 2025 ORDER: 1. This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1, 7 & 23 seeking to quash the proceedings in FlR.No.909 of 2023 of p.s., Detective Department (DD), CCS, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 66 C & D of the lnformation Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and Sections 419 and 42O of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 submitted that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, LA.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to record compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. This Court, vide orders dated 23.07.2025, directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Tetangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

4. Pursuant to the above said direction, the parties have 1 appea red before High Court fe$hl Services Committee and the \ \ t \ ) 7 Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report dated 04.08.2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in FlR.No.909 of 2023 of P.S., Detective Department (DD), CCS, Hyderabad, registered against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 ,7 &23 are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings fuc.No.52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC Code:SB1N0020070, MICR No.500004057) and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry.

6. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. i__ //TRUE COPY// SD/.C.DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Xll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. 2. The Station House Officer, Cyber Crime Police Station, Hyderabad District. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at, I Hyderabad. [oUT]

4. One CC to Sri S. Ram Reddy, Advocate tOpUCl 5. One CC to Sri C. Sunit nnand, Advocate iOfUCi 6. Two CD Copies (Along with a Copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) / TotalAmount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri S. Ram Reddy, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 13-08-202s as Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand onty) to the "Director, Sainik Wetfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No.140646 of 2025 dated os-12-2025. Kam/PSL w HIGH COURT DATED i1310812025 \ \ COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 in/and CRLP.N o.9217 ot 2025 . r;- '' --) \i l t: I 1, 1 E tlC iti?5 ALLOWING BOTH t.As D CRIMINAL PETITION ^.fAW -!.r!--- YI :. .' O/trMORANDTA4 OF CRIMINAL PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION . ,.1,, 528 OF BNSS) ., :.. ' ' : i ,* ,,. j, AI: HYDERABAD cRLP.No 1ll)ror zozs BETWEEN l. Gadhagoni Chakradhar Goucl, S/o Gadhagoni Ramakrishna Goud, Aged 36 Years, Occ: Owner of Farmer First Foundation, R/o Bhavya Shiri Krishna Avenue, Villa No.l0, pragathi Nagar, Hyderabad, Also at: Flat No.lCr2, ptot No.29, 30, 3l, 32, Sai park Vierv, VTC Bachupally, Nizarnpet, IVledchal- Malkajgiri District, Telangana_500090 (A-t).

2. Uppari Jagadishwar S/o Ramulu, Aged about 25 yearc, Occ: private Employ:ee, R/o H.No.40l, Shravyavatika App, Somajiguda, Hyderabad; also at l_lb-g, Ravulapally, Marpally, Ranga Reddy District - 501106 (A-7).

3. Chereddy Auroshika Reddy Wo Chakradhar Goud, Dlo C.Malla Reddy, Aged about 28 years, Occ: Chairman at Farmer First Foundation, R/o Bhavya Shiri Krishna Avenue, Villa No.10, Pragathi Nagar, Hyderabad, Also at: H.No.5-28l3, Buddha Nug*, Peerzadiguda, Ghatkesar, Boduppal, 1 0 AND U.5o6d ee{lN 4 ...Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1,7 & 23 \"a,Y- .! ={tErrF-

1. The State of Telangana Represent by the Public Prosecutor High Court at HYderabad.

2. Sri.Posu Sheshank S/o Posu Praveen Kumar' Aged 33 Years, Occ: Private EmPloYee, Wo U.No. 18-3-469 tlll12, Rajannabowli, Phool bagh Chaman, Aliabad, Hyderabad-s00053' .. . ResPondentslComP lainants .r ME o RE SPONDENT No.2 o It is submitted that the petitioners are arrived as Accused Nos' I' 7 & 23 in the present FIR No. 909 of 2023 on the file of Ps, DD, ccs, Hyderabad, for the offences under Section 66 (C) & (D) of I.T.A. Act 2008 and Sections 4lg,42O of IPC. It is submitted that respondent no.2 is the complainant in the present case' The allegations in the complaint are that the complainant got a call from one lady introduced as Varsha and she informed him that he was selected for Data Entry jobs and they are offering Google Pay for data entry jobs, initially she shared some PDF over whatsapp and she asked complainant to type it and send it in word format within 10 days some were links were shared by her thereon they have sent an email address prosubmi [email protected] and asked the complainant to share the project to that email and that after submissions they informed him that he got scored g6.6%accuracy and accordingly tris pay will be Rs.44,400/- and it will be paid through Google Pay or Phonepe or direct bank transfer and first they asked him to pay Rs.681/- and sMS charges to numbet g64016,7746@ai*el and again they asked him to pay Rs.1888/- as employee account opening balance to the UPI Id finteam@kotak and again they asked him to pay poc charges to the uPI Id finteam@kotak and that he paid .g.s"t,a"ry,K*roV Y' Rs.6666/- as \v'DV"J< :: t ! , I I I : I I 1 2 !fi r somehow they convinced and they made him to pay Rs. 1666r- as taxes to the otsfinance@kotakupi id. and also they asked him to pay Rs.356/- - document charges trpl Id and trrat after paying ail these amounts they switched off their mobile numbers and they blocked his number also. It is further alleged that the following numbers were used for transferring the amounts i.e., 9133597824, 9640t67746, 77ggs47g3l, 9133093350 and . regularly complainant was getting normal text messages from these bulk sMS and the tiPI Id names shown as Gadagouni chakradhar Goud, ChereddyAuroshika Reddy and Narsimha Murthy. a J It is submitted that the petitioners have never participated or practiced i, these types of activities and the phone numbers, email ids and the UpI Ids mentioned in the complaint ancl remand report' does not belong to Petitioners. 4' After registering the present FIR, Police have arrested some of the Accused and remanded them to judicial custody on 17/05/2023 and, in which the petitioners' names were mentioned as Accused No.l, 7 & 23.It is submitted that'complainant very recently came in contact with the petitioners and in the said conversation complainant himself admitted that the said complaint was not lodged against the petitioners herein. It was further learnt that the email ids and upi ids do not belong to petitioners. 5' It is submitted that in the said conversation both complainant and petitioners have decided to compromise and close the case as the said complaint is not filed against the petitioners herein. Due to the intervention of elders of both sides the petitioners and respondent no.2 havecome to a compromise and to avoid legal consequences both the parties have decided V- 5"ef/ uutl"'"L ?tq W. _rilE.'- r! !l TIdt!r ETg h .F:l 1{ 1 to settle their disputes amicably as the petitioners are not the actual persons who have cheated the complainant and., in these circumstances, it is just and necessary to quash the present FIR No. 909 of 2023 on the file of PS, DD, CCS, Hyderabad. t. l :, It is therefore prayed that this Flon'ble Court may be pleased to record compromise and quash the proceedings in FIR No. 909 of 2023 on the file of PS, DD, CCS, Hyderabad, against Accused Nos.l,7 & 23 and be pleased to pass such other and further order/s as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Chakradhar Goud V Jep"lee'(hP't Uppari Jaga"deeshwar Chereddy Auroshika Reddy Date: 106/2025 Place: Hyderabad ? swrw* ' Sri.Posu Sheshank C r No.2