Ogirala Subbarao and 2 others v. The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 420, 506, 509
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In the light of the written instructions, this Court is of the view that no orders need be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. August 7, 2009 KSH _________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J
Judgment
Cause title
PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
WRIT PETITION NO : 15480 of 2009 Between: Ogirala Subbarao and 2 others. AND ..... PETITIONER(S)
The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada and others. .....RESPONDENT(S)
ORDER :
The petitioners filed this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, stating that the respondent Nos.2 and 3 are harassing them daily in the name of investigation and are further forcing the petitioners to sign papers as there is a civil dispute between the petitioners and others.
On notice, the learned Assistant Government Pleader received instructions, wherein respondent No.3, the Sub Inspector of Police, Satyanarayanapuram Police Station, Vijayawada, has categorically stated that the petitioners 1 and 3 are accused in a case in Crime No.365 of 2009 on the file of Satyanarayanapuram Police Station, which was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 506 and 509 of IPC and in connection with the said crime only the petitioners were asked to appear before the Court and the petitioners were never asked to sign any papers nor were harassed. It is further stated that the police are not interfering in any civil litigation relating to the petitioners.
Operative part
In the light of the written instructions, this Court is of the view that no orders need be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. August 7, 2009 KSH _________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 420, 506, 509.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.