✦ High Court of India · 12 Sep 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 12 Sep 2025

2. Smt. M. Seetharamamrna, Wo M. Venkateswarlu, Hindu, aged about 66 yrs, Occ: Housewife, R/o H.No.1-9-112211/1, Apple Hous-e, Opp. Andhra Mahila Sabha, Vidyanagar, Hyder*ad ...Petitioner/Plai ntiff AND

1. A.Narayan Reddy (died per LR), 2. A. Narasimha Reddy, S/o A. Narayan Reddy, Hindu, aged about 53 yrs, Occ: Agriculture R/o Hydershakote Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R. District. 3. A. Sudershan Reddy, S/o A. Narayan R,eddy, Hindu, aged about 49 yrs, Occ: Agriculture R/o Hydershakote Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R. District.

4. A. Raghava Reddy (Died per LRskspondents/Defendants, 5 to 7) 5. Smt. A. Manjula, W/o Late A.Raghava Reddy, Hindu, aged about 3Z yJs, Occ: Housewife R/o Hyderchakote Village, Ralendranagar Mandal, R.R. District.

6. A. Harshavardhan, S/o Late A. Raghatla Reddy, Hindu, aged about 14 yrs, Minor, Rep.by his naturalguardian Srnt. A. llanju{a Wo Late A. Raghava Reddy, Hindu, aged abogt-3S yrs, Ooc: House wife, R/o Hydershakote Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R. District.

7. A. Vamshi Reddy, S/o Late A. Raghavafieddy, Hindu, aged aQoqt 12 yrs, Minor, R.ep. by his naturatgtrardiah Srnt. A. Manjula W/o Late A.Rag.hava Reddy, nVb HyOershakote Viltage, Raiendranagar Mandal, R. R. District. ...Respondents . Petition under Section 1Sl of CpC praying that in the circumsiances stated in the affidavit fited in suoport of tn5 pliiltn, the High ?lg?:"9 to stay ail further proceedings in OS f\io. 1g7 ot 2OOB on the file of the Addl. Junior 'Civit Judge, Rajendraiagar, n.n.Oistrict pending disposal of the revision in the interest of Justice. ";;;;;" under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia agrgrieved by the Order daled 1,7l0&l2t) 10 Passed in 1.A.No.968 of 2009 in OS No.197 of 2008 on the file of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy.Distrid. 1 'it

2. D 1. A.Narayana Reddy [died] per LRs 2. A.Narasimha Reddy, S/o.A.Naravan Agriculture R/o.Hydershakote Viliage District- Petitioner/Ptaintiff Reddy, Hindu, Aged about 53 yrs, Occ: , Ha1endranagar Mandal, Ranla Reddy District. 't',Hfr fl"ilf ?.,itd,.:{",4[",,?t?":fi :i##:]it;'fi :,ft1T$"X?yR"?ff , 4' A'Raghava Reddy (Diedr, per LRs Respondents/Defendants s to 7 'i&i$ili3#L:,yJ3,:e'""-tiSiiiliEE:[.,{d#;i}i?,.ifl #.?',,"H:ll,l"rg%", 6. A.Harshavardhan , S/o.Late A.Radhava Dishict. by his natural guardian Smt. A.Ma njula, Wo aged about Mandal, Ra nga Reddy , Hindu, A. 37 yrs, Occ: Housewife, Ri/o. Hydershakote District.

7. about'12 Petition under section 1.51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, inJ riiJn court may be preased to stay au further pro,:eedinos in os. No_.1'9712008;; it J'iirI ot Addr. Junior civir Judoe Rajendranagar, Ran--qa Reddy Dist;icr, ;;iil;,:;osat of ttre revision in i-hle interest of justice. petition under Artiole 227 of ttre Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the Order dated 17tOAt2O1O Passed in 1.A.No.776 of 2009 in OS l'1o.197 of 2008 on the fib of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Raierdra Nagar, Ranga ReddyDistrict. Between

1. M/s. lnternational Graphics Limited having [s qtroe at 610, Amrutfta Estate iimaiathnigar, nyOeraOad, rep Oy its Di6ctor Smt. fl.LavqyaKumari Wo. -nab,'HinOu, A'g"d +O Yeams,. Occ: Business R/o.1€-1 1221111, fr4.Cibnava Appte"Ho use, Opp. And hia fii[a hila Sabha, Vidyanagar, Hyderabad

2. Smt. M. Seetharamamtn€I, W/o M. Venkatesraerlu Hindu, -Housewife R/o H.No. 'l-g-112211l1, Apple House, Opp. Ardhra tvlahila Sabha, V9y.an3gar' HVderaUiO ...Petitioner/Plaintiff AND

1. A. Narayan ReddY (DIED PER LR)

2. Hindu, aged about 53 Mardal, yrs, R.R.

3. A. Sudershan Reddy, S/o A. Narayan Reddy Htql,Agriculture Rl/o - Hydershakote Village, Rajendrandgar Mandal, R.R. District'

4. A. Raghava Reddy (Died per LRs Respondents/Defendants, 5 to 7) 5. Smt. A. Manjula, w/o Late A. Raghava- FeOly E!Nu.Fg.usewife R/o ff yOerrnafoie vittage, Rajendran-agar Mandal, R.R. Qistrict' RR 2 and 3 are declared as LR'sof deoeased Rl as per Court Orderdt 7.09.2012 in CRP MP 261012012- RR 5 lo 7 are declared as LR's of deoeased R4 as per CourtOder dt 0710912012 in CRP MP 261012012.

6. A. Harshavardhan, S/o Late A. Ragtnva Reddl'Hi.lrdu, MinS, Rep. byhis - naiuraig;aidian Smt n Manjula..ffo Late A..RaghavqReddy, 35 yrs House *if", HiiO, nyo Hydershakoti Viltage, Raiendranagar Mandal, 'f*Y?Sit,ff :fl 's;{:^"ffi.fl r"trile'i,T"x:h:H"1;{fl &!ffJr}[T:,"" *ite, ftiiO; Fyo Hydershakotri Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, - ...Respondents 1 petition under. Section 151 CPC praying ttrat in the oircumstarrces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petit'ron, the High Cowt rnay [6 pleased to stay all further proceedings'in OS No.1gTl2OO8 on the fih of Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajendranag;, Ranga Reddy District perding disposal of the CRP in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRIR A ACHUTHAI{AND Counsel for the ResPondents: - The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER TIIE H'oN'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKOITDA c.R. P.!Ios. 1786 and 1795 of 2OL2 alall 1292 of L7 I I I N Today when the matter has come up before this Court for hearing, lbarned counsel for the revision petitioners submits that thr: cause in all the three Civil Revision petitions does not survive for further adjudication and the civil Revision petitions have become infructuous.

2. Recording the said submission, all the three Civil Revision Petition s are dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Vliscellaneous petitions, if any are pending, shall stand dismiss,ed. Sd/. A. JAYASREE EfrlNffil=GlFfirrltrl //TRUE COPY// I CTION OFFICER To,

1. The Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy district. 2. One GC to Sri R A Achuthanand, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two C;D Copies ABKAam HIGH COURT DATED: 12l0'gl2025 COMMON ORDER I r' , '\) TH:: S ( 1 ; i.,l /026 * A-.--..-^,.,r.6 * CRP Nos.1786 and 1795 OF 2012and1292of2017 DISMISSING ALL THE CRPs AS INFRUCTUOUS /.e@ : I t I I I I I I I I I I t ; I I I t i i i I i i . ',

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments