✦ High Court of India · 14 Aug 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 14 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
14 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
2,131 words

1. The State Of Telangana, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana At. Hyderabad.

2. M/s.Shree Gayat hri Digitals, 1st Floor, 15-3-65/5, Beside Gu rudwara, Authorized erabad-sOO 012. Represented by its thula Surender Reddy, S/o Bahula Yadi Reddy Gowliguda, Hyd Representative Ba J Sved Qayemuddin, S/o Late Syed Mubashiruddin, Aged about 64 years' Occ Business, R/o H.No.19-2-1 1/61,3rd Floor, Chandulal Baradari, Misrigunj, Hyderabad. ...Respondents Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in S.T.C. N.l. No.3595 of 2022 on the file of X Metropolitan [/agistrate (for Nl Act cases), at. Hyderabad u.rder Section 138 of Negotiable lnstruments Act as the same is untenable eitt-er on facts or under law. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that n the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in S.T.C.N.l.No 3695 of 2022 on lhe file of X lVletropolitan Magistrate (for Nl Act cases), at. l-yderabad including appearance of Petitioners pending disposal of the main Crirninal Petition in the interest of justice l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: M/s.Shree Gayathri Digitals, l st Floor, 15-3-65/5, Beside Gurudwara, Gowliguda, Hyderabad-500 012. Represented by its Authorized Rr:prresentative Bathula Surender Reddy, S/o Bahula Yadi Reddy ... Petitioner/Respondent in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2025 AND

1. The State Of Telangana, Through Public Prosecutor, Hilyl-r Court for the State of Telangana At. Hyderabad ...RespondenURespondent No.1 in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025

2. Mls. Florence Publishers, Shop No.4-5-64, Book Basenent, Womens College Road, Beside Andhra Bank, Kothi, Hyderabad.

3. Syed Shakeebuddin, S/o Late Syed Mubashiruddin, Aged about 54 years, Occ Business, Rlo 16-7-46118, 4th Floor, Bank Colony, Azampura, Chaderghat, Hyderabad.

4. Syed Moizuddin S/o Late Syed Mubashiruddin, Aged aoout 53 years, Occ. Busf ness, Rlo 16-7 -46118, 3rd Floor, Bank Colony, Azampura, Chaderghat, Hyderabad.

5. Syed Zarnulabedin Javeed, S/o Late Syed Mubashirud,Cin, Aged about 51 years, Occ. Business, Rlo 16-7-46118, lst Floor, Bank Colony, Azampura, Chaderghat, Hyderabad.

6. Mr.Syed Riyazuddin Jawwad, S/o Late Syed Mubashiruddin, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Business, Rlo 16-7-46118, 5th Floor, Bank Colony, Azampura, Chaderghat, Hyderabad. ...RespondenUAccused Nos.1, 3 to 6 in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2025 7 Syed Qayemuddin, S/o Late Syed Mubashiruddin, Aged about 64 years, Occ Business, Rio H.No.19-2-11161 ,3rd Floor, Chandulal BaraCari, Misrigunj, Hyderabad. r ...RespondenUAccused in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 (Respondent No.3 & 4 is not necessary No.2 parties to the present compromise) Petition under Section 359(6) BNSS praying that in the clrcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitroner/ Respondent No.2 to compound the offences in S.T.C.N.l.No. 3695 of 2022 on the file of X Metropolitan magistrate for Nl act case Hyderabad under section 138 of negotiable instruments act and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise statement and the quash the proceedtngs Petitioner Respondent No.2, herein to Compound with Respondents/Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 , 3 to 6 who are Petitioners in the above Crl P.No. OF 2025 on the file of this Hon'ble Court which is filed to quash the proceedings in S.T.C.N.l.No.3695 of 2022 on the file of X Metropolitan Magistrate (for Nl Act cases), at. Hyderabad under Section 138 of Negotiable lnstruments Act. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri ANKARLA DHEERAJ, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.'1 and none appeared for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER -t/ HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2025 in/a nd CRIMINAL PETITION N o.9306 of 2025 ORDER It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 3 to 6 as well as the respondent Nos.2 and 3, that during pendency of the present criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, LA.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

2. Vide order daled 24.07.2025, this court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, tligh court Legal I I Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangarrer, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

3. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High court Legal Services; committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 07.0g.21i25 and the same is placed on record.

4. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2C25 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and thr: proceedings in s.T.c.N.l.No.3695 of 2022 on the file of the X Metropolitan lvlagistrate (for Nl Act cases), at Hyderabad, against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 3 to 6 are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners/accused lr os.1 and 3 to 6 2 ETD, ] CrL.P 9306 2025 paying an amount of Rs.5,000r (Rupees Five Thousand onry) to the Director, \ sainik welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.s21BB9262z9, state Bank of lndia, shantinagar Branch (2ooro), rFSC code:SBrN002ooro, MICR No.500004057) and Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and fire proof of the same before the Registry. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO REGISTRAR U D / /TRUE C0PY/ / ECTION OFFICER To, v

1. The X Metropolitan f\tlagistrate for Nl Act Cases at Hyderabad. 2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. One CC to Sri Ankarla Dheeraj, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies (Along with a Copy of Joint lVlemo f Compromise) Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri A.Dheeraj, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 14.08.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, Sainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed [/emo as proof of compliance USR No.'103205 of 2025. NVB/PSL I HIGH COURT DATED:14108t202s t !. .:-,- *lhar 'r" t t i t'!- /'1 {t' \" .,,,|. ,,-, ..'o il'. --'-'t::-. -'- COMMON ORDER lA.Nos.3 AND 4 OF 202;'s" ln/And CRLP.No.9306 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE CRLP AND I.A.Nos.3 A]rID 4 oF 2025 v 4rs /.4,/q,//r # HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT.HYDERABAD CRL, PETITiON NO oF 2025 (AGAINST S.T.C.N.I.No.3695 of 2022 ON THE FILE OF X METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE (FOR NI ACT CASES), AT: HYDERABAD) BETWEEN: 1 2 3 4 5 M/S.FLORENCE PUBLISHERS, Shop No.4-5-64, Book Basement, Women's College Road, Beside Andhra Bank, Kothi, Hyderabad. SYED SHAKEEBUDDIN, S/o Late Syed Mubashiruddin. Aged about 54 years, Occ: Business, R/o 16-7-461/8, 4th Floor, Bank Colony, Azampura, Chaderghat, Hyderabad. SYED MOIZUDDIN, S/o Late Syed Mubashiruddin, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Business. R/o 16-7-461/8, 3,d Floor, Bank Colony, Azampura. Chaderghat, Hyderabad. SYED ZAINULABEDIN ]AVEED, S/o Late Syed Mubashiruddin, Aged about 51 years, Occ: Business, Rlo L6-7-46tl8, 1st Floor, Bank Colony, Azampura, Chaderghat, Hyderabad. MR.SYED RIYAZUDDIN JAWWAD, S/o Late Syed Mubaihiruddin, Aged about 49 years, Occ: Business, Rlo L6-7-46UB, 5th Floor, Bank Colony, Azampura, Chaderghat, Hyderabad. AND PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NOS.1, 3 to 6 1 2 3 IHE STATE OF TELANGANA, Through Public prosecutor, High Court For the State of Telangana At: Hyderabad. M/S.SHREE GAYATHRI blcTRs, I 1.:,Ftogr, 1S 3-6515, Beside Gurudwara, bowtrguda. Hyderabad_500 012. Represented by its Authorized Representative BATHULA SURENDER REDDY, S/o Bahula yadi Reddy SYED QAYEMUDDIN, S/o Late Syed Mubashiruddin, lgeg.a-!orlt-6 4 years, Occ: Business, R/o H.No. 19-2 - 1 1/61, 3d Floor, Ctandulal Baradari, Misrigu nj, Hyderabad. (Kespondent No.3 is not necessary Parties to the present compromise) P llt:SPONDENTS It is submitted that the petitioners/Accused Nos.I , -l to 6 herein had filed the above Criminal petition to eUASH the proceedings in s'T'C'N'I'No'3695 0f 2022 0n the fire of X Metroporitan r4agistrate (for NI Act cases), at: Hyderabad under Section 138 c1, Negotiable Instruments Act. It is submitted that the Respondent No.2 had filed a s'T'C'N'I'No'3695 0f 2022 0n the fire oF x Metroporitan wra{listrate (for NI Act cases), at: Hyderabad under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against the petitioners herein and Respcrndent No.3 herein seeking to punish them in accordance with the provisions of Section 138 and 142 of NI Act. It is submitted that during pendency of STC, the petitioners had expressed their intention to repay their share amount out of cheque amount of Rs.1,50.000/_ to the Respondent No.2. Thercfi)re, at the /b continue the matter was advice or elders and wefi-wishers. the Respondent No.2 had agreed to withdraw the above case against the petitr o ners/Accu sed Nos.3 to 6 on ly and it against the Respondent No.3. sa rTl e Accordingly, in compromise between the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1, 3 to 6 and Respondent No.2 out of court. Thus, the issues among the petitioners/Accu sed Nos.1, 3 to 6 and RCSPONdCNT NO.2 ArC SETTLED THE MATTER OUI OF COURT tO thEir full and final satisfaction in TERMS OF COMPROMISE which are tabulated hereunder. R OF MP MI

1. THAT the Respondent No.2 had fited a S.T.C.N.I.No.3695 of 2022 on the file of X Metropolitan Magistrate (for NI Act cases), at: Hyderabad under Section 138 of hlegotiable Instruments Act against the Petitioners herein and Respondent No.3 herein seeking to punish them in accordance with the provisions of Section 138 and 142 of NI Act. 2' THAT the petitioner Nos.3 to 6 herein on beharf of petitioner No.1 had agreed to clear their share of amount to the Respondent No.2 out of the subject cheque amount of Rs.1,50,000/_

3. THAT the Respondent No.2 in lieu of amicable settlement, it had no objection to quash the S.T.C.N.I.No.3695 of 2022 on the file of X Metropolitan Magistrate (for Ni Act cases), at: Hyderabad against the Petitioners only.

4. THAT the petitioners and Respondent No.2 had agreed that the disputes were arose between them have been settred at the instance of elders and well-wishers and as such the Respondent No.2 had no objection to eUASH the S.T.C.N.LNo.3695 of 2022 ori the fite of X Metropolitan Magistrate (for NI Act cases), at: Hyderabad. 5- TiIAT the Respondent No.2 and petitioners/Accuserd Nos.1, 3 to 6 shall not have any claims, disputes against each otlre. and equally they will not flle any compraint against each other in frr[;re in view of settlem e n [. )k,

6. THAT in view of settlement arrived between the petitioner Nos.1, 3 to 6 and Respondent No.2, the petitioners had paid an amount of Rs.1,20.000/- to the Respondent No.2 settlement which the Respondent acknowledged. towards its ftrll and No.2 had re:ceived

5. THAT in view of receipt of amounts from the petitioner Nos.1. 3 to 5, there is no claim or whatsoever between the Fetitioners and Respondent No.2. It is therefore prayed that this Hon,ble Court may Lre pleased to ALLOW the above Criminal petition as prayed for in terms of compromise in the interest of justice. oare:ff , o7.zo2s Wdf- /t\. PLACE: HYDERABAD W PENTION ER,iACCUSED NO. 2 ,r?*4 PETITTONER/ACCUSED NO.4 PETITIONER/ACCIJSED NO. 1 PETITIONERIACCIJSED NO. 3 ffitrt PETITIONER/AC:.,SED NO.5 COUNSEL FOR P I D IONER/ACCUSED NOS.1, 3 to 6 COUNSEL FO RESPONDENT NO.2 ^ () 13 \--4,- RESPONDE'N'T NO,2 1-_

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments