T. Kiran Kumar v. 'l The State of Telangana

5. The District Registrar, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Medchal. 6. The Sub Registrar, S.R.O., Kukatpally, Medchal-Malkajgiri District 7. M/s.Jasvik Homes Pvt. Ltd., Door No 2-23-522192. Plot3l2and 3/3, First Floor, Tulasi Nagar, HMT Hills, Opp JNTU, Kukatpally, M.M.District- 500072 Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Mr.Middey Susheel Paul S/o.Middey Madhava suresh Kumar' Aged about 26 yrs' ...RE''.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents 2 to 4 on the representation dt.27.O1 .2025 and in not taking any action against the illegal construction made in Site No. S13A, Ward 1S-Block 31, APHB Auctioned Plots Phase-V, 80 Feet Road, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Medchal Malkajgiri District as illegal, contrary to law, arbitrary and violation of Art 14, 19 and Art.21 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the Respondent No.S and 6 not to register any sale deeds or any transactions in revenue records of the illegal construction made by the Respondent No.7 and to stay all further illegal construction made by the Respondents No.7 in Site No. S13A, Ward 1s-Block 31, APHB Auctioned Plots Phase-V, 80 Feet Road, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Medchal Malkajgiri District, pending disposal of the writ petition. tANO:1OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to -direct in" n".pono"nts No.2 to 4 to submit a detailed report with regarding to the illegal constructionmadebytheRespondentsNo.TinSiteNo.Sl34,Ward,lS-Block31' APHB Auctioned Piots Phase-V, 80 Feet Road, KPHB (lolony' Kukatpally' Medchal Malkajgiri District, pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Peti the affidav the Respo the illegal Block 31, Kukatpally, Medchal lr,4alkajgiri District, pending disposa I of the writ petition tionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin it filed in SUpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleasecl to direct ndents No.6 and 6 not to register any sale deeds or any transactions of construction made by the Respondent No.7 in Site No 513A, Ward 15- APHB Auctioned Plots Phase-V' 80 Feet Road, KPHB Colony' lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to 4 to stop the illegal construction made by the Respondent No.TinSiteNo.Sl3A'Ward,1S-Block3l,APHBAuctionedPlotsPhase-V,80 Feet Road, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, tvledchal Malkajgiri District without proper permission. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NADELLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2 TO 4: SRI K.RAVI MAHENDER' SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S & 6: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the ResPondent No.7: -' The Court made the following: ORDER '#ffi7 -{14.11 ,,"vI I I I I t I 1 I I I HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE B' VUAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.211.49 oE 2025 ORDER: (oRAL) This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to declare the action of rcspondents No'2 to 4 in not considering his representation dated 27 .01 .2025 with regard to illegal construction undertaken by respondent No.7 in the subject property bearing site No'S 13A' Ward No.l5'BlockNo.3l,APHBAuctionedplots'Phase-V,80feetroad, KP[{B Colony, Kukatpally, Medchal-Malkajgiri District' as being illegal' arbitrarY and unconstitutional'

2. Heard leamed Mr' N'Venkateshwar Rao' learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. K' Ravi Mahender' leamed Standing Counsel for GHMC' appearing tbr respondents No'2 to 4; and perused the material on record' Learned Standing Counsel for GHMC' basing on the written l. instructions, submitted that on complaint of the petitioner' show cause notice dated 3O'Og'2024 was issued to respondent No'7' As the said notice was not complied with' speaking order dated 09'10'2024 was passed directing respondent No'7 to remove ' the unauthorized constructions made in the subject property within a period of fifteen (15) r -r . ;- ; : !;*r 16 -,,.;; 2 days lrom the date of receipt of the said notice. Ar; the unauthorized construction was not removed, respondent No.3 is:;ucd notice under Section 46 l-A of the Greater l{yderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and seized the subject propefty on 24.03.2025 wherein unauthorized constluctions have been rnade in deviation o' the sanctioned plan_

4. Leamed counsel fbr the petitioner submitted that the construction activity is going on in the subject property and there is delay on the part of the respondent authorities in taking steps to implernent the speaking order dated 09.10.2025. Such contentions are disputed by the leamed Standing Counscl lor C[{MC.

5. In the circurnstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authoriries to implemenr the speaking order dated og.ro.2024 for removar of unauthorized constructions made by respondent No.7 in the subject propefty, if not already irnplemented. The petitioner is given liberty to approach this court if the speaking order rs not implenrented. There shall be no order as to costs. in' / )/ // 3 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications' if any' pending in this writ petition stand closed f. I ,r,,P#'J;IA'JIIA SECT ]I FFICER ji{*[:"z,",,]-,.; D //TRUE COPY'/ "i$i'irfri:**'*i#:H#.ffift ;:urul lw: Two CD CoPies I PSK, BS HIGH COURT DATED:2210712025 \ I ORDER WP.No.21149 of 2025 ct. 0E sEP2E .. \ ,:)- * D€ sFli -+ t. . -'.- l/ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \?