G.V.Appa Rao v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Cooperative Department & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 24 Jul 2012
- Bench
- C V NAGARJUNA REDDY
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Counsel for the petitioner:
Sri L.V.S.Naga Raju Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP for Cooperation The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Operative part
At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: proceedings in Rc.No.1269/2004B
…to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the surcharge 16.06.2009 under Section 60(1) of the APCS Act issued by the 2nd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the A.P.Cooperative Societies Act and Rules made there under and consequently set aside the surcharge proceedings in Rc.No.1269/2004B dated 16.06.2009 under Section 60(1) of the APCS Act issued by the 2nd respondent.
At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, interim order, dated
07.02.2012, shall stand vacated and W.P.M.P.No.3615 of 2012 and W.V.M.P.No.1944 of 2012 shall stand disposed of as infructuous. 24th July, 2012 VGB C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 14; A.P.Cooperative Societies Act.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 24 Jul 2012. The bench was C V NAGARJUNA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.