The High Court · 2025

1. The State of Telangna , Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Hyderabad.

2. Sri Vishnu Sankar, S/o. Late Eshwar Rao, Aged about 36 years, Occ. AGM (Laison at NCL lndustries Ltd., R/o. H.No.20-3-625, Flat No. 203, Moosa Bowli, Hussainialiam, Hyderabad

3. The Branch firlanagaer, State Bank of lndia, Pottery Road Aria Branch, Kolkata - West Bengal - 700 046 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the ltrlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the CC No.3090/2021, on the flle of XXll Additional Chief lt/letropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, against the Petitioner/Accused. ...RespondenUComplainants I.A. NO: 1OF 2021 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C. No. 309012021, on the file of XXll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Secunderabadbad, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2022 Between: NCL lndustries Limited Rep by its Sri Vishnu Sankar, S/o. Late Eshwar Rao, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Erhployee NCL C/o. H.No 20-3-625, Flat No. 203, tr/lbosa Bowli. Hussainialiam, Hyderabad. Petitioner/ResPondent No.2 AND 1 Anil Kumar Singh, S/o. Ramachandra Singh, Aged about 46 years,.Occ. Business, It/anaging Director of Awadh Engineers Pvt- Ltd., R/o. H.No.S- 60, Plot No.21, Ayyappa Colony, Dammaiguda, trledchal tvlalkajgiri District, Hyderabad. ...Petitioner/Al

2. The State of Telangna , Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Hyderabad.

3. The Bank Managar, State Bank of lndia. Respondents/Respondents Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lr/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay granted vide order in lA No.1/2021 in CrlP No.776712021 . l.A. NO: 2 OF 2022 Between: Sri Vishnu Sankar, S/o. Late Eshwar Rao, Aged about 36 years, Occ. AGM (Laison at NCL lndustries Ltd,, R/o. H.No.20-3-625, Flat No.203, lt/loosa Bowli, Hussainialiam, Hyderabad ...Petitioner/Respondent Defacto Complainant in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 ol 2022 AND

1. The State of Telangna , Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Hyderabad.

2. Anil Kumar Singh, S/o. Ramachandra Singh, Aged about 46 years, Occ. Business, lvlanaging Director of Awadh Engineers Pvt. Ltd., R/o. H.No.5- ...Respondent in l.A.No.2 and 3 of 2022 -r*;. 60, Plot No.21, Ayyappa Colony, Dammaiguda, Medchal lVlalkajgiri District, Hyderabad. ...RespondenUPetitioner/Accused in I.A.No.2 and 3 ol 2022 Petition under Section 320 (6) Cr.P.C praying that In the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Permit the Petitioner and Respondent No-2 to compromise the matter in C. C. No.3090/2021 for the offences under section 406,420 ,467 ,468 '47 1 RA//120-B of lPC, on the file of the XXll Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, in the interest of iustice. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2022 Petition under Section 320 (2) Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the C.C. No.3090/202 1 for the offences under section 406,420,467 ,468,471 RA/V in the above criminal petition and quash -B of lPC, for the file of the XXll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad. in the interest of justice This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the l/emorandum of Grounds of Crimrnal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri AEDULA GOVINDA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri [t/l.Vivekananda Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri P.Subash, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO l.A.Nos.2 and.3 of 2022 IN/AND CRIN'IINAL PETITION No.7767 of 2021 ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.3090 ol 2021 on the flle ol the XXII Additional Chiet Metropolitan Magistrare, at Secunderabad, rvherein, the petitioner r.r,as made as an accused No.1 for the offences punishable under sections 406,420,467,468 and 4l I rlw 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860

2. During the pendency of this criminal petition, petitio ner/accu sed No.1 and respondcnt No.2/de-tacto complainant have entered into compromise to resolve the disputes pending between them and filed joint affidavit along with I.A.No.3 of 2022 and also filed LA.No.2 of 2022 to record the compromise and to compound the otfences 3 . Upon perusal of the record, it reveals that this Court, by order dated 05.08.2025, directed the petitioner/accused No.1, Respondent No.2/de facto complainant, and respondent No.3 to 2 appear belbre the Sccretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, along with theil identity cards for the purpose of identification on 12.08.2025. In compliance with the said order, tl.re petitioner/accused No.1 and respondent No.2 appeared before the Secretary Telangana High Courl Legal Services Committee However, Respondent No.i lailed to appear. Accordingly, the Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee has submitted its report dated 12.08.2025

4. During the course of hearing, Sri A. Govinda Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submittcd that the petitioner is not seeking any relief against respondent Nos.2 and 3, and that they '"vere impleaded as proforma respondents solely on the ground that respondent No.2 had lodged a complaint against the petitioner based on information furnished by respondent No.3, aileging that the bank guarantee provided by the petitioner was not genuine. He further seeks to withdraw the criminal petition against respondent No.3, and prays that the compromise entered into between the petitioner/accused No.l and respondent No.2/de facto complainant be recorded, pursuant to the joint memo hled by the parties. 3

5. The above said submission was not disputed by the Ms. Mounika, learned counsel representing Mr. P.Subash, leamed counsel lor lespondent No.2

6. Accordingly, criminal petition insotar as rcspondent No.3 is concemed, is dismissed as withdrawn !

7. Both the learned counsel submitted that the petitio ner/accuscd No.1 and respondent No.2 cntered into complorrise at the intervention of their'"ve11-'"vishers and eldcrs and settled their disputes. The terms of compromise were mentioned in the joint affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.3 of 2022

8. l.aking into consideration the above t'acts and circumstances including .joint memo filed by both the partics, proceedings in C.C.No.3090 ol 2021 on the flle of the XXII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Secunderabad, against the petitioner/accused No.1 is liable to be quashed.

9. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2022 are allowed. Consequently, the criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.3090 of 2021 on the hle of the XXII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Secunderabad, against the 4 petitioner/accused No.1 are hereby quashed. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. To, SD/.N SRIHARI PUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER

1. The XXll Additional Chif Metropolitan ttlagistrate at Secunderabad' 2. The Station House Officer, Tukaramgate Pollce Station' Hyderabad' 3.TwoCCstothePublicProsecutor,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri Aedula Govinda Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri P.subash,Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD CoPies NVB/ABK w HIGH GOURT DATED:1610912025 COMMON ORDER lA.Nos.2 and 3 ot 2022 ln/And CRLP.No.7767 of 2021 :x*:t\ '^ ,i')'. t.:.) iJ ?[6 i: ..t" <f ,,.r' ALLOWING THE CRLP AND I.A.NOS.2 AND 3 OF 2025 ,{dq k-