The High Court · 2025

...RespondenURespondent lio.1 in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 2 Sri N-Rami Reddy, S/o. N.P.Reddy, Aged about 76 yerrrs, Occ. Business, R/o. Plot No.553, Road No.27 Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-soo 033

3. Smt Rama Devi Nadikattu, W/o. R.Reddappa Reddy, Aged about 51 years, Occ. Service, Rio. 8-1-301/41, Laxmi Najdr, Shaikfiet Nala, Hyderabad_50d 008.

4. Smt.Shanthi Nadikattu, W/o. Saj.iala Narendranadha ReCdy, D/o Nadikattu flishna .Reddy, Aged_about 48 Years, Occ. Software nlo. A_t- =nljineer, 301/41, laxminagar, Shaikpet Nala,. Hyderabad-sOO 00S, p"resenily residing at 49, Primrose ClR, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of 'Americal Represented by her Generar power of Attorney smt.Rami:devi Nadikattu D/o Klishna Reddy Nadikattu, Aged about 51 Vears, Occ llervice, nl". A_i 301/41 , Laxminagar, Shaikpet-Nala, Hyderabad-500 OO8. i I I I

5. Smt.Madhuri Nadikattu, Wo. Gutthikonda Raghava, D/o. Nadikattu Krishna Reddy, Aged about 48 Years, Occ. Software Engineer, R/o. 8-1-301/4'1, Laxminagar, Shaikpet Nala, Hyderabad-500 008, Presently residtng al 2374. Rolling Fork CIR 207, Herndon, VA, United States of America, Represented by her General Power of Attorney SMT.RAMADEVI NADIKATTU D/o- Krishna Reddy Nadikattu, Aged about 51 Years, Occ. Servrce, R/o. 8-1-301/41, Laxminagar, Shaikpet Nala, Hyderabad-5O0 008.

6. SRl.Kikkuru Vijaya Bhasker Reddy, S/o. Late K.C.M Reddy, Aged about 59 Years, Occ. Business, Rl/o.10-1-18/27, Shyam Nagar, Masab Tank, Hyderabad-500 004.

7. Sri.P.Vara Prasad, S/o. P.Bala Prasad, Aged about 55 Years, Occ. Private Service, Rl/o- Plot No.221, Salarjun Colony, Hyderabad-S00 008.

8. Sri.B.Sreenivas, S/o. B. Narsimha, Aged about 41 Years, Occ. Private Service, Rlo. 13-6-254151N1, Heera Nagar, Gudimalkapur Hyderabad-S00 008. ...RespondenUPetitioners in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petrtion, the High Cour[ may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/Res pond ent No.2/De facto Complainant to compound the offences with the Respondents/ Petitio n ers/Accused Nos.1 to 7 under Sections 415, 406, 42O,468, 471, 12O (b) IPC R/w. 34 IPC and 156 (3) CrPC in FIR Dated 15.09.2021 with Crime No.1O87 of 2021 on the file of the PS., Narsingi, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District and pass such other and further order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Record the terms of Compromise between the Petitioner/ Respondent No.2, herein and the Respondents/P etitioners herein and Quash the proceedings in FIR No.1O87 ot 2021 Dated 15.09.2O21 on the file of the PS., Narsingi, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District for the offences under Section 415, 406, 42O, 468, 471, 12O (b) IPC R/w. 34 IPC and 156 (3) CrPC against the Res pondents/Petition ers and pass such other and further order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of Justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M/s RESU LAW OFFICE , Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 , and of Sri P. Cha ndrashekar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.911 3 ot 2025 COMMON ORDER 1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos. l to 7 in Crime No.1087 ot 2O?-1, on the file of Station House Officer, Narsingi Police Station, Cyb:rabad District, registered for the offences punishable under sections 415, 406, 420, 468,471 and 120b read with 34 of lPC, 1860 and Se:ction 156(3) of Cr.P.C.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 7 as well as respondent No.2 that during p,endency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.No.2 & 3 of 2025 have been filed by respondent No.2/defacto complainant seeking permission to ,:ompound the offences, to record compromise and to quash the proceedings against the petitioners in the above crime.

3. The learned Additional public prosecutor ha:; opposed the compromise petition. .-..- ;L ,,*-. ]iGsi:_ 2 ffo,1 t.A.Nos.2 & JoJ 2025 h/ond Cilp No9lllol ZO25

4. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana yrde orders dated 23.10.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 04.11.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion, entered into compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in Crime No.1087 of 2021, on the file of Station House Officer, Narsingi Police Station, Cyberabad District, are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana, within a 3 Efo,) t.ANot.2&3ol2O2s ih/ohd c.]p No9t13 ol 2025 period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry

7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/- N. SRIHARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR (7 SECTION OFFICER I To,

1. The XVI Add tional lr,4etropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad a1 Rajendranagar. 2. The Station l.louse Officer, Narsingi (CyB) police Station Cyberabad 3. Two CCs to the public prosecutor, High Cou( for the State of Telangana at 4. One CC to SRt lylls RESU LAW OFF|CE, Advocate [OpLrC] 5. One CC to SRt p CHANDRASHEKAR, Advocate [OpUC. 6. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] (Along with copy of Joint memo is enclosed herew t r! Note: Total Amount of Rs 10,00O1 ( Rupees Ten thousand onl,r )has been paid by lv/s Resu Law Office, counser for t'he petitioner oil"t"o by the Hon,bre court vide order dated 1 3 11 .2025 as Rs 5,0001 f nrp"". ii* thcu:sand onty ) to the "High Court Legal Ser-vices Committej ,t ffyJ;rrUrO, Rs.5.0rl0^ (Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telanqana High Court eOro"rtu. ir.ociz ti:n, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of com jtiance uSn r.r" r aioaa ;ibzs -r" NVB/PR -1,,. ,t HIGH COURT DATED:1311112025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.9113 of 2025 (Jo ( * 1l1i: SI4 2 I NIIJ ;l[25 z SrqrCP (:<) ALLOWING THE CRtMtNAL pETtTtON AND t.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 c @ HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT: HYDERABAD CRLP.NO. 9113 0F 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI.N.RAI'4I REDDY S/O. N.P.REDDY, Aged about 76 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. Plot No.553, Road No'27 Jubilee hills, Hyderabad-500 033. 2 SMT.RAMA DEVI NADIKATTU W/o. R.Reddappa Reddy, Aged about 51 Years, Occ: Service, R/o. B-1-301/41, Laxmi Naqar, Shaikpet Nala, HYderabad-500 008. SMT.SHANTHI NADIKATTU Wo. Sajjala Narendranadha ReddY, D/o. Nadikattu Kris hna ReddY, Aged about 4B Years, Occ: Software Engineer, R/o. 8-1-301/41, Laxminagar, Shaikpet Nala, HYderabad-500 008, Presently residing at 49, Primrose CIR, Princeton, New JerseY, United States of America, Represented by her General Power of AtIoTNCY SMT. RAMADEVI NADIKATTU D/o. Krish na ReddY Nadikattu, Aged about 51Years, Occ: Service, R/o. B-1-301/41, Laxminagar, Shaikpet Nala, HYderabad-500 008. r No.1 ',,/) 'Ka n* Petitioner No.4 , .r &* \ Petrtioner No.2 (,...^- Petition N o.3 Kv 9h^/4q l^;.19 Petitioner No.5 Petitioner No.6 Petiti n er No.7 Respondent No.2 4 5 6 7 @ SMT. N4AI)H URI NADIKATTU W/o. Gutthikonda Raghava, D/o. Nadikattu Krish na ReddY, Aged about 48 Years, Occ: Software Engineer, R/o. B-1-301/41, Laxminagar, ShaikpeL Nala, HYderabad 500 008, Prese n tly residing al 2374, Rolling Fork CIR it207, Herndon, VA, United States of America, Represenl-ed by her General Power of Attorney SI'lT.RAMADEVI NADIKATTU D/o. Kri:;hna ReddY Nadikattu, Aged about 51 Years, Occ: Service, R/o. B- 1-301/41, Laxminagar, Shaikpet N3la, HYderabad-500 008. SRI.KIKKUIlU VIJAYA BIIASKER REDDY S/o. Late K.C.M ReddY, Aged aboul 59 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. 10-1-18/27, ShYarn Nagar, Masa b Tank, Hyderabad-500 004. SRI.P.VARA PRASAD S/o. P. Ba la Prasad, Aged about 55 Years, Occ: Private Service, R/o. Plot No.221, Salarjun ColonY, Hyderabad-500 008. SRI. B.SIIEt,NIVAS S/o. B. N a rsim ha, Aged a bout 41 Years, Occ: Pn'/ate Se rvice, R/ o. t3 -6-)s4 / s/ A/ 1., Heera Nagar, GudimalkaPur Hyderab d-s00 008 Petitioner No. i t^/.-r I Petitioner No Q-^".- Petitioner No.2 7'-''4,^-- N o.3 I)ctit io n K! \A;Yl^RINP Petitioner No.5 F'etition er No.6 Petit toner No.7 R dent No.2 2 O 1 2 @ AND THE STATE OF TELANGANA Throu gh Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. SRI.Y.VENU KUMAR S/o. Late Y. Narsimha, Aged about 46 Years, Occ: Private Service, R/o. 2-32, Neknampur Village, Gandipet Ma ndal, Ranga Reddy District-500 089. JOINT COMPROMISE MEMO RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS

1. It is respectfully submitted that the Respondent No.2 filed the Private Complaint against the Petitioner/Accused Nos.1 to 7 alleglng offences under Section 415,406,420,468,47L, L20 (b) IPC R/w 34 IPC and 156 (3) CrPC inter-alia alleging that his father Late Y. Narsimha and his younger brother Late Y.Balaji were the pattedars and possessors of land Bearing Sy.No.79 Part, 79/1 part, B0 Part, 102 Part,103 Part and 104 Part, admeasuring Ac.12-00 Gts., and Sy.No.146 Part admeasuring Ac.2-00 Gts., totally admeasuring Ac. 14-00 Gts., Situated at Neknampur Village, Gandipet Mandal. The Respondent No.2 further stated that during the lifetlme of Y.Narsimha and his brother Y.Balraj along with Respondent No.2 and Y.Prabhakar Pet oher No.1 t /- {.-,- 4l Petitioner No ^'( .1Ir* *,Q^ Petitioner No \ 2l *'&^ Petitione o.3 6 v Fl-s'*k l(-e,S/ Petitioner No.5 Petitioner No.6 Peti No.7 Rcsponden t No.2 entered into a Generat powYof Attorney Dated 22 0'1 1996' bearing DoCUmentNo.lBllgg6tnfavourofK.L.ReddyS/o.K.IlamReddyby giving sale powers to him in respect of the above mentioned land'

2. The Respondent No.2 further stated in his corrplaint that the said General Power of Attorney holder K'L'Reddy along with the other landstakenthepermissionfromHUDAandconverlecthelandsinto plots and sold the plots to the respective purchasers and in the year ZOO2 the said General Power of Attorney holder K t- Reddy handed over the unsold plots vide Plot bearing Nos'281 admeasuring 400 Sq' Yds, Plot No. 282 admeasuring 400 Sq Yds, Plot No 294 admeasuring450Sq.Yds,PlotNo.2gTandPlotNo.2]13admeasuring 900 Sq. Yds, totally admeasurinq 2150 Sq Yds, anl' in Sy Nos'79 Part,79/TPart,B0Part,l02Part,l03Partandl04rart,situaledat NeknampurVillaqetotheRespondentNo'2andtohi:;:amilyandPlot Nos. 283, 284, 285,295 and 296 totatly admeasuring 2100 Sq'Yds', to his younger paternal uncle and also Plot Nos 261ll:'art,262/Parl, 275,276,277,279 and 280, admeasuring 1921. sq yds [o both the families together,

3. As the things stood thus few days ago the Resp his family members were shocked to know that so created fake documents in and over their abovc : nt to the concerned Department and l- which the :nde nt No.2 and 1e peoplc have ;aid plots, upon as obtained the Petitio o.1 r, &,.^- Petitioner No.4 Petitione r No.2 \ '(^-.'- retit'i er N K\{ F1*.1*"+*&t Petitioner No.5 t)etitioner No.6 Petit ner No.7 Respondent No.2 + .l (1 @ Sale Deeds Dated 13.06.2021, bearing document Nos.2456/2012, 2457/20L2, 2460/2012 aqd 2461/2012 and in turn basing on the above link other Sale Deeds has been created vide Document Dated 09.11.2072, bearing Document No.5397/2072, Dated 22.11.2013, bearing Document No.7270/2073, Dated 30.71.2013, bearing Document No.739l/2O13, Dated 27.72.2073, bearing Document No.7772/2073, Dated 24.02.2014, bearing Document No.1O16/2014, Dated 24.02.2074, bearing Document No.7079/2074, Dated 15.03.2074, bearing Document No.L367/2OI4, Dated 04.O4.2074, bearing Document No.1732/2014, Dated 25.04.2074, bearing Document No.2706/2AL4, Dated 02.05.2014, bearing Document No.2t72/2O14, Dated i5.05.2014, bearing Document No.Z4Og/2014. Dated 23.06.2014, bearing Document No.2978/2OL4, Dated 26.06.2014, bearing Document N).3O69/2O14, Dated 27.O7.2074, bcaring Document No.3450/2O74, Dated 06,08.2014 bearing Document No.37L2/2O14, Dated 30.08.2014, bearing Document No.4272/2014, Dated 25.09.2014, bearing Document No.4676/2074, Dated 78.09.2014, bearing Document No.4569/2014, Dated 26'09.2014, bearing, Document No.47O5/2Ot4, Dated 0r.10.2014, bearing Document N1.4BO5/2O14, Dated 18 10.2014, bearing Document 17 .02.2016 , Document No.50B A"--. Petitioner No.2 2074 , \, Da ted L bearing Petitio No.3 { Pe tioner No.1 ,'y-, Petitioner N ),-4 "oJ Y-N %l'p/d.^{+ Petitione r No.5 Petitioner No.6 Peti ner No.7 Re pondent No.2 -) No.902/2016, No. 10 51l2016, No. 1138/2016, No,2t64/2Ot6, No.2973/201.6, No.3970/2016, No.397 7/2016, No.6462/2Ot6, No.671612016, No.447/2017, t)ated

20.02.20L6, Dated Da ted Dated Da ted Dated Da ted Da ted Dated Dated

24.o2.2016, t]-.o4.2016,

16.0 5.2016, o1.o7.2016,

01.07.2016,

08.09.2016,

19.10.2016, oL.02.2017,

30.04.2018, bear inq bearing bearing bearing bearing bea ring bea rin g b ea ring bearing bearing Document Document Docu m e nt Docu me n t Document Document Document Document Document Document Date d bearing

22.06.2019, Document No.40B2l2018, No.9621/2019 and to his dismay they learned aboul: tlrtl above said encumbrances in respect of their above said plots as il thelr lhe then General Power of Attorney holder has executed it inII.c:dlatcly they approached their the then General Power of AttorneY hc-rldcr Sri K L' Reddy and he denied about the execution of any dor'ttrnent by him a fter the Year ?.O02.

4. The Respondent No 2 further submits that after ..r keen perusal of the above said Sale documents they learned that sc nre iake people have executed the same by impersonating their [hc thcn General Power of Attol-ney holder K.L,Reddy by forging his slgrtatures and thumb impressions and even [he address mentioned u 'lder [he name of a lleged General Porver of Attorney holder is also f :)und wrong as .f) '\n Petitioner No. L J__ IJ Petitioner No.4 Petitl No.7 L"*^-- Petitione r No.2 \ (^,"- retiI on No.3 \<,1 f)br)4.b^,?rw Pel-ition e r No.5 )e tit oner No.6 Rcspon dent No.2 6 I @ they obtained the certifrcate to that effect from the concerned Department. The photograph enclosed to the above said Sale documents is pertaining to a Fake person and in all the above Fake and forged Sale Deeds two persons namely P.Vara Prasad S/o P'Bala prasad, and B.Srinivas S/o. B.Narasimha attested as witnesses i'e, the Accused Nos.9 and 10 herein.. In the sard documents the.names of the Vertdees are i) Mr.N'Ram Reddy S/o. N.P.Reddy (Petitioner No.1), ii) Rama Devi Nadikattu W/o. R.Reddappa Reddy (Petitioner No.2), iii) Shanthi Nadikattu W/o. Sajjala Narendranadha Reddy (Petitioner No.3) and others who inturn have executed many other documents without any title and right and gained illegally and filed the Private Complaint before the Hon'ble Court and the same was referred to the Police Narsingi and the Policc Narsingi registered FIR Dated 15.09.2021 with Crime No.10B7 of 2021 under Section 415, 406,42O,468,477,120 (b) IPC R/w 34 IPC and 1s6 (3) CrPC' It is respectfully submitteci that after knowing about the crime 5. registered, the Petitioners with the common elders approached the Respondent No.2 and explained the facts that in fact the Petitioners are induced by third party and they are also victims and they should be the witness to the transactions and after due discussion the Petitioners and the Respondent No.2 compromised arld came to the understanding that the RespondcnI No.2 execute appropriate document in favour of the Peti[ioners or their successors to perfect their ti long with his familY members Peti to er No.1 I Petitione r No.4 a.ktloner N o.7 Peti K a^ Petitioner No.2 r\^-.J /'- P,'"'- Petitione U..f 4 Pe t tioner No.5 Petitioner No.6 Reipondent No.2 7 It is submitted that due to intervention of cotrlTnon elders and 6. well-wishers of both Petition er/Accu sed Nos' 1, to 7 and the Respondent No.2 herein at initially at the FIR stagc l-he matter was settled between them and accordingly Respondent T{rl 2 has given a DECLARATION cum SWORN AFFIDAVIT Dated 16'0 / 2025 accepting that the Respondent No.2/De facto Complainanl have executed Regrstered Sale Deeds with Petitio ne r/Accused Nos' 1 to 7 in respect of the above rnentioned Plots by receiving due Consrlr:ration from the Petitioner/Accused Nos.1 to 7 and further thtr dispute which Respondent No.2 had raised in his complaint lvas rc;olved amicably to his full and final satisfaction. The Respondent Nt '2 has submittcd his requisitron letter Dated 16'07.2025 to the Stai Jr Housc Officer, Narsingi, Cyberabad giving his consent and t\C OBIECTION for closure of Crinre No.1087 of 2O21 before thc PS' Narsingi while appreciating his withdrawal of Complaint more parr ir:trlar-ly for the reason of arnicable Settlement. Thb Petitioner/Ac':used Nos l lo 7 being the bonafied purchasers ior consideration of Lire Subject PIots, the Respondent No.2 has Ratified the purchases of )e:titioner/Accused Nos.1 to 7 which they acquired under their respecti .'r: Registered Sale Deeds. The Respondent No.2 realized [he Petitiorrcr/Accused Nos'1 to 7 arc innocents of the said Offences and therciorc are not liable for any prosecu tio n. /. In vi qf=s ettlrn g e matter belween th,t ResP ondent N a .2 I Petition r-Pe i No. i ,',-^ I -l ner l:o.+ / Petitioner-No.2 I Petitioner No .3 K n-ry Petitione r No.5 Petition r No.6 Petiti ner l'lo . 7 Respond ent No.2 IJ @ and the Petitioner/Accused Nos.1 to 7 the Respondent No'2 withdrew the Comptaint or FIR No.10B7 of 2077 Dated 15 09 2021 on the file of PS. Narsingi. Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District against the Petitione r/Accu sed Nos.1 to 7' Further the Respondent No'2 has NO OB]ECTIONtoallowtheCRLPNo.gll3of2025byquashingtheFIR No.1087, of 2O25, Dated 15.09.2021 on the File of PS Narsinqi' Cyberabad; Ranga ReddY District' .\,. It.is ats6 declared by the Respondent No 2 as henceforth there B. shall be no claims or whatsoever against the Petitioner/Accused Nos.l to 7. The Respondent No 2 shall mean and include himself and his farhily'members and it is also Declared that henceforth either the Respondent No.2 or any person claiming through him shall not interfere with the lives or liberties of the Pctitioncr/Accused Nos' 1 to 7 herein in any manner with regard to Subject Plots' g. The Respondent No.2 shall not file any.fresh Casg/1, etc., against the Petitioner/Accused Nos l to future'concerning the same cause of action' Complaint/s, 7 herein tn Peti toner No.1 &,...--. 4 Petitione r No.4 N o.7M Petiti ,o f,(. ')L, Qu,,-- Petitioner No.2 Petition r No.3 KV ftAil4"J\kdP Petitioner No.5 Petitioner No.6 Respondent No.2 9 ry*t @ It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court rllay be pleased to record the terms of compromise and QUASH the I:IR No.10B7 of 2027, Dale 15.O9.2027 on the file of PS. Narsingi, Ct'Lrerabad, Ranga Reddy Districr aEainst the Petition e r/Accu sed Nos. L to 7 and pass such other and further order or orders as are deemr:cl fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest ll' jusfice. s PLACE : HYDERABAD DATED: .O9.2025 P TITIONER NO,1 PET]TIONER N &,"^- ao.2 c /a t-\,".-r PET'TIONER NO.3 r'Q I PE T IIOI]ER NO.4 W v fit^s,/./L-^ Kr&? PE l .t loNE o.5 PEII]-I OTJER NO.6 PE I I'I-tONER NO.7 \ RF: ;i--oNuENT NO.2 0'9Loi COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS COUNSE I1ESPONDENT NO.2 IO