Vulkondakar Sandeep Kumar, S/o v. Kishan, Aged about

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of State of Telangana at Hyderabad, K. Pradeep Kumar, S/o Late K. Yadaiah, Aged about 34 years, Occ- Private Employee, Rlo 14-8-226, Chudi Bazar, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad, Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash SC SPL No.94 of 2022 on the file of Vl Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge. Secunderabad in the interest of justice, ...Respondents l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying tha t in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petiticn, the High Court may be pleased tc, stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in SC SPL. No.94 of 2022 on the file of Vl Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad, pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 BETWEEN: K. Pradeep Kumar, Sio Late K. Yadaiah, Aged about 34 ),ears, Occ- Privale Employee, Rlo 14-8-226, Chudi Bazar, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad. ...Petitioner/2nd Respondent in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2025 AND 'l . Malik Badri Vishal Singh @ Badri, S/o M. Surenderlal t\ilalrk Aged about 3't years, Occ- Business Rio H.No.14-9-652/1, Jumerat Bazar. Hyderabad.

2. Malrk Praveen Singh, S/o Sukhlal Singh, Aged irbout 49 years, Occ- Business. R/o H.No.'14-9-652/'1, Jumerat Bazar. Hyderabad.

3. MalikHar dwar Singh @ Raja Babu, S/o Manojlal Mali'i, Aged about 34 years, Occ- Business. R/o H.No.'14-9-65211 , Jumerat Bazar, llyderabad.

4. K. Ramchander, S/o Kadar Rajaiah, Aged about 37 '/921s, Occ-Hamali. R/o 13-2-571, Shivlal Nagar, Rahimpura, Hyderabad - 500()06.

5. M. Venkatesh, S/o Late Myatari Badram, Aged about 34 years, Occ- Private employee Rio 13-3-595/Afl/5, Puranapool. Durga Nagar, Hvderabad - 500067 r

6. Vulkondakar Sandeep Kumar, S/o V. Kishan, Aged abdut 32 years, Occ- Employee in OGH, R/o 14-9-630, Jummerat Bazar Hycerabad - 500006. ...Respondents/Petitioners in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitior. the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners and 2nd responde nt to compound the offences in SC SPL. No .94 ol 2022 on the file of VI Addl. l\/etropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proreedings against the respondents/ Petitroners/ A-1 to A-6 in SC SPL. No.94 of 2022 on the file of Vl Addl. lt/letropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad bv allowing the Crl.P No 9131 of 2025. 7 This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri CH Ravinder, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of Respondent No.1 and of Sri Banavath Nageshwar Rao, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER I HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL P ETITION No.9131 ot 2025 ORDER It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the mattr:,r ancl accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to record the ccmpromise between them and to cc,mpound the offences.

2. Vide order dar.ed 22.07.2025, this cou( directec the parties arong with their respective counser to appear before the seoretary, High court Legal Services committee, High court for the stiate of relangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

3. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this court, the parties have appeared and the secretary, High court Legar sr::rvices committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated i:i1 .ol .2o2s and the same is placed on record

4. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2r)25 are allowed. consequently, this criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings in sc.SPL.No.94 of 2022 on the fire of Vr Additionar Metroporitan Sessions Judge, Secunder6626 against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6 is hereby quashed subject to the petitioners paying an amount of Rrs.5,000/- (Rupees I 2 - ETD, J CILP 9l3l 2025 Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC Code:SB1N0020070, MICR No.500004057) and Rs.5,0004 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- A.PRATHIMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR \ i \ SECTION OFFICER I

1. The Vl Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge. Secundeiabad 2. The XVI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad 3. The station House Officer, shah lnayath Gunl Police Station, Hyderabad 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

5. One CC to Sri CH Ravinder, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri Banavath Nageshwar Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CD Copies To, 4Y- ADK/PSL Along with a copy of Joint memo of compromise. Note: Total Amount of Rs '10,000A ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri CH Ravinder, Counsel for the Petitioners as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 12-08-2025 as Rs. 5,0001 ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, Sainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only )to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance vide USR No. 97 428 ol 2O25 dated 10-09-2025. HIGH COURT DATED:1 210812025 ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ot 2025 !n/and CRLP.No.9131 of 2025 .-:-- ri [: ;., ..-' 1E SEP 2tI5 \ Or \-'.\' ) (:. :1 .:, ,2 ALLOWING THE CRLP AND lA.Nos.3 & 4 OF 2025 q. 1t ----7/ ,/ HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE ", Crl'P No' ,':):}A AT HYDERABAD Between: ' ii,5+lll,t';xl**-i,' 2 $,$i,;fiff-:"8'$'$iii:' r*t*i$ffi;; a K.,-:t:rifuffiF$fl,[,*, 5 ffii{'ij500006 HYderabad - cuvvv- t I 5 ^-r'; w' [#{}l1liry'i3:$}'}Jiffi HYderabad 6 $:-i"[?f'tandeeoKumar' X;o'."Jlll J'i'il:;l"i?if'Tlrovee R7o 1a-9-t Hyierao"o - boooo6' And in oGH' Petitioner/A-1 to A-6 1 ffi ::+i::':l'i:.j1r?::ff :::"'"' Hign ".,u',,'.' at HYderaoau ' - 18 2 K. Pradeep Kumar, S/o K. Yadaiah, Aged about 34 years, Occ Private Employee, Rlo 14-8-226. Begum Bazar, Hyderabad. fr- Respondents JOINT IVETMO FILED BY THE PETITIONERS AND R::SPONDENT NO 2 It is submitted that the 2nd respondent has lodged a complaint against the petitioners before the Shahinayath Gunj Police Station, Hyderabad, basing on the same a case was registered for the olfences under section 147, 148, 324, 323& 506 r/w 149 tPC & Sec 3 (i) (r) (s) of SCs/STs POA Act, 1989 and Amendment Act No 1 o'f 2016 and the police have filed the charge sheet vide SC SPL No.94 of 2022 on the file of Vl Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad. As against the same, the pet tioners preferred the present quash petition to quash the SC SPL. No.94 of |t-022 on the file of Vl Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge Secunderabad

2. lt is submitted that during the pendency of the erbdvp sesslons case, the petitioners and the 2nd respondent at the intervention of elders, well- wishers and local people of both sides have settled the dispute amicably out of the court and both of them agreed to compromise the natter,

3. lt is submitted that the petitioner and 2nd responrjent herein files this present Joint Memo to compound the offences as agai rst the petitioners in view of the matter settled out of court amicably 7Lf l9 For the reasons stated above' it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permrt the petitioners and 2nd respondent to compound the offences in SC SPL No 94 ot 2O22on the flle of Vl Addl Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case' Hvderabad OateO: '07-2025 1 'tPetitioner 2"d Petitioner 3'dPetitioner 4thpetitioner 1<, k-Ir. Q/-ar-ro0.o? t 5thPetitioner F{ 6thPetitioner ,"[A r' ga$!'S a- ResPondent No 2 Cou nsel e rS Counsel fork espon nt No,2