✦ High Court of India · 12 Aug 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 12 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
12 Aug 2025
Length
1,687 words

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the tr/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to calt for the records relating to and in connection with the F.|.R.No.47BDA25 for the offences punishable U/s 351 (3) /w 3(5) of BNS, pending on the file of the ll Additional Judicial Magistrate Cum Additional Junior Civil Judge at L.B Nagar, and quash the same. l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O25 l.A. NO: 2 of 202! Between: Ayan Khatt, Sio. [Vusa Khan, Aged about 38 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Plot No. 66, R.-f.C Colony, L.B Nagar ... Petitioner/Respondent No.2 AND

1. lMohammed Aijaz Ahmed @ Fisal, S/o. Mohd. Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 45 years, Oc,c: Business R/o. H.No. 2-3-603124, Patel Nagar, Amberpet Seminary, Hyderabad.

2. Ahmed Hussain @ Amir, S/o. Akhter Hussain, Aged about 32 years, Occ: Busiress, R/o. H.No. 22-3-9471331N1, Purani Haveli, Setwin Lane, Charminar, Hyderabad.

3. Syed Ahred [Vlehdi, S/o. Syed ltlohammed tvlehdi, Aged about 26 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 23-1-391 and 392, Second Floor, Kotla Alijah, Charminar, Hyderabad Jubilee, Hyderabad.

4. The State of Telangana, Through Public Prosecutor, Rep. by Station House Officer, L.Ei Nagar Police Station, Rachakonda, Telangana. ...Petitioner/Accused Nos.1 to 3 ... RespondenURespondent Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandttm of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the peiitioner to compound the offence and quash the proceedings in connection with the F.l.R. No.47812025 dated 13.05.2025 on the file of the ll Additional Metropolitan lt/agistrate Cum Additional Junior Civil Judge at L.B Nagar. l.A. NO: 3 ol20215 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lt/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings in connection with the F.l.R. No.47812025 date'd 13.05.2025 on the file of the ll Additional Metropolitan f\4agistrate Cum Additional Junior Civil Judge at LB Nagar. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Mohd lslamurJdin Ansari, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of tMohd. Arifiruali, Aclvocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and ORDER: It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

2. Vide order dated 22.07.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, \ Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report. ! T

3. Pursuant to the apove said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 28.07.2025 and the same is placed on record. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed.

4. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in F.l.R.No.478 of 2025, (L.B.Nagar Police Station) on the file of ll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate cum Additional Junior Civil Judge at L.B.Nagar against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 is hereby quashed subject to the trI It I l t * 2 ETD, J Crl.P 9089 2025 petitioners paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188926279, Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC :SB1N002,.0070, MICR No.500004057) and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of before the Registry. us applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/. P.PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The ll Aclditional Judicial llagistrate cum Additional Junior Civil Judge, LB SECTION OFFICER Nagar, Ranga Reddy Hyderabad [OUT]

2. The Stati<>n House Officer, LB Nagar Police Station, Rachakonda 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at 4. One CC t,r Sri Mohd lslamuddin Ansari, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC t,r [Vlohd. Arifiruali, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies ABK Note: TotalAmount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Mohd lslamuddin Ansari, Counsel for the Petitioners as directed by the Hon,ble Court vide order dated 12.08.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, Sainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Te'langana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 19356 of 2026. ii;;.- " '.r-i4ffi;"' €. ,} HIGH COURT ETD,J DATED: 12108f,2025 ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3l of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.9089 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE l.A.Nos.2 and 3 ot 2025 AND THE CRIMINAT. PETITION t IHE 1 t HAR 202[ * * IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (' /l l.A. No. Crl.P.No. ot2025 ot2O25 Between: 1) Mohammed Aijaz Ahmed @ FisatS/o. Mohd. Abdul Qayyum Aged about 45.years, Occ: Business , R/o. H.No. 2-3-60312{ Patel Nagar, Amberpet Seminary, Hyderabad. ' 2) Ahmed Hussain @ Amir S/o. Akther Hussain, Aged about 32 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 22-3-9471331N1, Purani Haveli, Setwin Lane, Charminar, t' Hyderabad 3) Syed Ahmed MehdiS/o. Syed Mohammed Mehdi, Aged about 26 years, Occ: Business R/o. H.No. 23-1-391 & 392, Second Floor, Kotla Alijah, Charminar, Hyderabad Jubilee, Hyderabad .....Petitioner/Accused Nos. 1 to 3 And 1) The State of Telangana, Through Public Prosecutor, Rep. by Station House Officer, L.B Nagar Police Station, Rachakonda, Telangana. 2) Ayan Khan S/o. Musa Kha, Aged about 38 years, Occ : Business, R/o. Plot No.66, R.T.C Colony, L.B Nagar. ..'Respondents Jaip-f nflol MEMoRANDUM oF coMPRoMlsE I This memorandum of compromise is made and executed on this the 09't day of January,2O2O at Hyderabad, Telangana., b1,'and between : - Mohammed Aijaz Ahmed_ @ Fisal S/o. Mohd. Abdul Qayyunn , Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business ' R/o. H.No. 2-3-603124, Patel Nagar, Amberpet Seminary, HYderabad. Ahmed Hussain @ Amir S/o. Akhter Hussain, Aged about 32 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 22-3-9471331N1, Purani Haveli, Setwin Lane, Charrninar, Hyderabad. s 0 r-i 1":'i L;,. i A ''' !{ Syed Ahmed Mehdi S/o. Syed Mohammed Mehdi, .Aged about 26 years, Occ: Business , Ft/o. H.No. 23-1-391& 392, Second Floor, Kotla Al'rjah, Charminar, Hyderabad Jubilee, (Hereinafter referred to as the "First Party") f'. ,a.ND Ayan Khan S/o. lVlusa Kha, Aged about 38 years, Occ : Business, R/o. Plot No.66, R.T.C Colony, L.B Nagar, (Hereinafter referred to as the "Second Party") 1 That the Second Party has given a complaint to the S.H.O., L.B Nagar Police Station orr 13.05.2025 stating that on 12.05.2025 at22:00 hrs persons by name Fisal, & Amir and his eight henchmen men (associates) came to his Yours Time food court at RTO Colony, Opposite Kamineni Hospital and threatened his staff and asked for complainant and created panic situation at food court. Previously Fisal haC financial issues with respondent No. 2 and also Amir made phone to responctent No. 1l with his phone number 8522001424 and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence the respondent No. 1 registered a case against Petitioners in Cr. No. 47812025 U/s 351(3) r/w 3(5) BNS.

2. lt is subnritted tlrat the 2nd respondent and the 1tt petitioner are friends and having monetary transaction. Recently dispute with 1't petitionerlAl arose with regard to refund of money there was argument taken place between the 1't petitioner and 2nd respondent. The 2nd petitioner is 1tt petitioner friend. Due to misunder:itanding and to get time to repay the amount, th,e 2d respondent lodges thr-. present complaint

3. That bas ng upon the complaint, the police registered a case in Crime No. 47812025 U/s 351(3) r/w 3(5) BN.S. That during the course of investigation, due : to interverrtion of the well-wishers and elders, the First Party wishes to settle the monetary issue with the Second Party and the Second Party agreed to compoun I the olfence voluntarily. #4,*- ' '!'. \ i

1. That the Second Party keeping an view of the intervention of the elders, and settlement of monetary issue with the First PaO, the Second Party has agreed to withdraw ffte case in F.l.R.No.478 of 2025 on the file of the L.B Nagar police Station, R.R. District.

2. Thatthe Second Party has hereby agreed to settle the monetary dispute with the first Party and agreed to withdraw the complaint for the sake of better future of the both of them.

3. That the second party undertakes to appear without fail before the Hon'ble High Court as and when his appearance is required for recording the compromise and to file proper affidavit and other documents necessary for withdrawal of the criminal case against the first party First Pafi :'r 4k 1) 2) 3) I Party. Counsel for the Second Party.

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments