Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 13 Dec 2004
- Bench
- GODA RAGHURAM
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
1 SMT. KONDA VIJAYA RANI, W/o. Konda Srinivas, ADVOCATE, R/o. H.No. 3-3-222, LB Nagar, Hyderabad (AP)-500 074. 2 KONDA SRINIVAS, S/o. Late Sri. Konda Janardhan, R/o. H.No. 3-3-222, LB Nagar, Hyderabad (AP)-500 074. AND ..... PETITIONERS
1 The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, NEW DELHI. 2 The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, NEW DELHI. 3 The Governor, Reserve Bank of India, MUMBAI. 4 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 5 The Director General Of Police, Andhra Pradesh Police, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 6 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad Police, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 7 The Station House Officer, Afzalgunj Police Station, Hyderabad. 8 Sri Balamuralidhar, Inspector of Police/Station House Officer, Afzalgunj Police Station, Hyderabad. 9 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Afzalgunj Police Station, Hyderabad. 10 Sri S. Jayaram, The Sub-Inspector of Police, Afzalgunj Police Station, Hyderabad. 11 The Transport Commissioner of AP, VI Floor, Burgula Ramakrishna Rao Buildings, Tankbund, Hyderabad. 12 The Mitra Agencies, Rep. by its Managing Director, Sri. Bhaskara Murthy, 3-6-478, Anand Estates, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad-29. 13 The Mittal Auto. Com., Rep. by its Managing Director, Flat No.202, II Floor, GS Towers, 3-6-151/153, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad-29. .....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate WRIT or DIRECTION declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 7 & 9 in encouraging the Respondents like 12 & 13 in indulging unlawful activities under the guise of business is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to conduct detailed investigation into the activities of financial institutions, firms and companies like Respondents No.12 & 13, and order the Respondents 6,7 & 9 to produce the said Vehicle Model "MARUTHI" Alto Lxi bearing No. AP9 MA T/R 5792, Engine No. 3090316, Chasis No. 363661 before the 4th Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.K.SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 Mr.A.Rajasekhar Reddy, Standing Counsel for Central Government: Counsel for respondent No.2: ;Mr.C.Sadasiva Reddy Counsel for respondent No.3: Mr.K.Srinivasa Murthy Counsel for the respondent Nos.4 to 10: G.P. for Home Counsel for the respondent No.11 & 13: None appeared Counsel for the respondent No.12: Mr.D.V.Shiva Prasad The Court made the following :
O R D E R:
Aggrieved by the alleged intervention of the 9th respondent in handing over the “MARUTHI” Alto Lxi bearing No. AP9 MA T/R 5792 to the 12th respondent in contravention of the statutory obligations of the 9th respondent qua an F.I.R dated 05-06-2004, registered in Afzalgunj police station the writ petition is filed. In respect of this grievance, the petitioner has appropriate remedies under the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the circumstances, this court does not see any reason to go into the issue in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with a liberty to the petitioners to pursue all such alternative remedies as are available to them under law. No costs. ___________ 13-12-2004 Mjl/* To
The Secretary, Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, NEW DELHI. 2 The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, NEW DELHI. 3 The Governor, Reserve Bank of India, MUMBAI. 4 The Secretary, Govt of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 5 The Director General Of Police, Andhra Pradesh Police, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 6 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad Police, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 7 The Station House Officer, Afzalgunj Police Station, Hyderabad. 8 The Inspector of Police/Station House Officer, Afzalgunj Police Station, Hyderabad. 9 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Afzalgunj Police Station, Hyderabad. 10 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Afzalgunj Police Station, Hyderabad. 11 The Transport Commissioner of AP, VI Floor, Burgula Ramakrishna Rao Buildings, Tankbund, Hyderabad. 12 2 CD copies.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 13 Dec 2004. The bench was GODA RAGHURAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.