✦ High Court of India · 25 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 25 Oct 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petrtion, the High Court may be pleased to stay the execution of decree and judgment passed in OP NO.477 of 2013, dated 1 1 .05.2016 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Vehicles Claims Tribunal-Cum-l Addl. District Judge, Mahabubagar. Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRl. KOTA SUBBA RAO Counsel forthe Respondents: MOHD YOUSUF Counsel for the Respondents: 10375/MOHD YOUSUF The Court made the following: JUDGMENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKIT SHNA REDDY M.A.C.M.A No.1101 of 2Ol7 JUDGMENT: Learned counsel appearing for the appellant reported that the matter has been referred to the Lok Adalar r onstituted by the High Court Legal Services Committee, [[ derabad, for settlement. After due deliberations, the Lok Adir at passed arr award on 13 .O9 .2025 as per thc terms agreed upon by the parties. The original award dated 13.O9.2O25 rs i I rd before this Court and the same is taken on record.

2. Accordingly, this appeal 1S disposed of in rerms of the award dated 13.O9.2025 bv the Lok Adalat. Pending miscellaneous applications, if al., shall stand closed. T SD/-MJ\WAHARREDDY ASSIST {NT REGISTRAR ,/TRUE COPY' {il :CTION OFFICER To, Hyderbad. Mahabubnagar. '1. The Chairman, Motor Vehicles Claims Tribunat-Cum-l Adc . Diskict Judge, 2 The Secretary, High CoUrt Legal Services Committee, Higlr lourt Buildings at 3 One CC to SRI KOTA SUBBA RAO Advocate [OpUCl 4 One CC to SRI IUOHD YOUSUF Advocate IOPUC] 5. Two CD Copies GE/PSL \r- Enclosing along with a copy of Lok Ada{at Award -. .-E=- HIGH COURT DATED:25/10/2025 :l JUDGMENT MACMA.No.1101 ol 2017 1 ir.E.sLi c !r .- I ' "1 r''lf zt) * o€gqq1,'t * ,*- DISPOSING OF THE MACMA IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT AWARD a,-de ,fr"' BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES @MMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)i E Date: 13-09'2025 Present:1. Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devi, (Former Judge of Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman

2. Smt. Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member M.A.C. M.A.NO.11O1 of 2017 (Beforethe Hon'ble High Court) . AGAINST SER o o =t5 * HIGH COURT I-OK AOAIAT 1 g t ol1 : O.P.No.477 of 2013 . (On the fite of the Motor Vehicles Claims Tribunal -cum- I Addt. District Judge, Mahabubnagar) Between:- Bharati AXA General lnsurance Company Ltd. , Rep.by its Authorized Signatory, 3'c Floor, 6-3-6661P'16, Gokul Towers. Punjagutta, Hyderabad. '1. N.Kondat neddy, Sio.'Mohan Reddy, aged 37 yrs, Occ: Nit, R/o. Padmavathi ColonY, Mahabubnagar Proper and District. AND ...AppellantiRespondent No. 2 ... Respondent/Petitioner 7 Kasireddy Purushotham Reddy, 5/o. K.Venkat Ranga Reddy, Aged Major, Occ: Owner of Car No'AP-22- AH-5666, R/o'H No'4-35, Kinchirjopatty Vittage of Pebbair Manda[, Mahabubnagar District' (R2 is hot necessary) ...Respondents/Respondents Couniel for Appettant/ lnsurance Company : Sri Kota Subba Rao, Advocate CounselforRespondentNo.l/Petitioner/Ctaimant:SriMohd.Yousuf,Advocate/ 5ri Swadesh, Advocate .RepresentatiVeoflnsuranceCompany';:.[?iiH;$1''-1i:?itH:" This appeat having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearinq. the Learned counsel for the parties and atso the parties, the fottowing award is Passed: A*ARD Compensation Awarded by the Tribunal inety-six thousand ontY) with Rs.20,96,000/- (RuPees Twenty [akhs n costs and interest at 17% p{ annum from the date of petition titt the date of reatization. -,= This MAC/v1A has been preferred by the II rTance Company agg, by the order passed in MVOP.No.477 of, Ctaims Tribunal -cum-t Add[. District Jud!€ J13 by the Motor Vehic. Mahabubnagar. ,._ ! -'. Sri A{ohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior /4 nager Legal Ctaims of the I I lnsurance Company/Appettant has appearl represented that the Respondent No.'1 /Pei his counseI has appeared and identifiel l '- I before lhe Lok Adatat and I . ioner/ Claimant atonq with before the Districr Leeat l re pendency of this Appeat, ] Senvices Authority, Mahabubnagar. Durine : ' mutuatly ente.eci into ai both the parties reported that they hav compromise and settted the matter. ln I ew of the setttement, the Appettant- Insurance Company has agree I to pay an amount of Rs.16,50,000/- (Rupees Sixteen takhs fifty thousand on[y) apart from the amount atready'deposited towards fu I and final setttement of the ctaim and the Respondent No.1/Petitiorr, r/Claimant has agreed to receive the same towards futt and finI setttement of his cLatm. Accordingty, the compromise is recorce: and the Award is passeC before the Lok Adatat. ln view of the above settlement, the A: ;e[tant- InsuTance Company shat[ deposit the above agreed amount wit in (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of Award, after dedlt( ting the amount that was deposited, if any. In the event of defal t or detay in making such deposit, the Respondent No.1 /Petitioner/( aimant is entitted to ctaim interest as awarded by Tribunal from the I rte of default. Compengqtion Awarded (Setttement Rbached ) in the Lok Adatat. Slfi (-) I HIGH COURT fox ePnuar ';'*i- stel. ol1 t Apportionment of Com ensation if an Additional Direction (s):

1. The Appetlant is entitted to the refund of Court Fee pai,J 2. The amount atready deposited by the lnsurance Compa n this appeat. ry, if any, sha[ be given credit to.

3. Soon after deposit by the lnsurance Company, th€ Petitioner/ C taimant is permitted to withdraw the entir€ Respondent No.1 / mount. In token of consent for ihe above settlement and award, t re parties and their counsel have signed this award in our presence. , ln terms of the compromise arrived at between'the par.i ,s, this case stands disposed of. \zr l.z'P c /]- tir'l II ,x i[.,]i..]-ili' Cnfl{l/J Rj.!C,xt li-v:=ilt r.i { lr. li / t" ,: y ':'.-.1 ' d. P"A&? ) I ( g GEHEML IfiSURANC @Io 6 !: cost aoo€ B&.-?OOE iEF N ** ** 460 o2, I a I j, -, --- i ' . . . , i. \'jJ - S Cell: 9030 B.A.,LL.B,, .vo CATE, D rillia'rii,a'llY UBNAGAR,S0gOOl 36, 9848441436 i.i..:;i- i-i.i. ; -- rffi#ffiaa .:l \-r'+ CHqIRMEN' SEB * HIGH COURT LOK ADAIAT .. .; rl+i+' --t --{ t Itate ot 1 |' 't.'ir; J 1 .-:. B€<

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments