✦ High Court of India · 06 Mar 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 06 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
06 Mar 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
2,115 words

the above said rand pending disposar of the above Revision peti ion fired by the petitioner before the 2tnd respondent herein. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 103200 F 20171 Petition under liection i51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the peiitio;, in" Hign court may o. pr"*LJ to direct the responderrts herein not to interfere with..petitione r,s p ossession and enjoyment of Ac.4 10 gts. of rand in s.No.g17175, pironcha rrittaere ano-n,|anJat, Bhad rad ri-Kothag ude rn District, pending disposal of the above Wp., Counsel for the petitioner: SRI KIRAN REDDY MALLARAPU Counsel forthe Respondents: ASST. Gp FOR REVENUE WRIT PETITION NO: 8350 0F 2017 Between: Suryadevara Ritmmohana Rao, s/o Kotaiah, aged about rO yr;, Occ Medical e-.1 61, Market' Area, N;; F;E;;h#nr,i.j. ;i xot[u6ri"ii 3'.,S,?[P.",., r/o .r AND

1. 2 3 4 5 ..PETITIONER State of Telanqz,na. reo hv its Secretary, Revenue Departntent. Government of Telangana. -S :cretaiiat,' Hyderabad.'' The District Coll,::tor. Bhadradri_Kothgudem District, Kothagude m (earlier District Colector, Khammam Oistriii aiknam;il ' '' The Joint Collec.or, Bhadradri Kothagudern District at Kothagud.:m. The Revenue Diy sional Officer, Kothagudem, B hadradriKothagt rdem District The Tahsildar, Paloncha Mandal, Bhadradri_ Kothagudem Distrir t. ..RESPONDENTS Petition under r'rticre 226 0f the constitution of rndia prayirg that in the circumstances stated ir the affidavit rireo treiewittr, the High c )urt mav be pleased to- issue an appropriate writ, order "i oir""til" prnilrrri r""""'il ,n" nature of Mandamus, rrecraring decraring the inaction ot tr.r" zn,j rlrp""i""t in. not disposin<, 0f the Revision pltition rireo bv the petitio rer on 20-8- lg1e1n 2014 undq Sec.166-8 of A.p. (T.A.) t_anO nevenue eci, rctf i'qrrrii."rgin" inaction of the Sth reslnndent herein in not r*tiiv,"g entries irr the pahanies by entering petitioners nane.,as owner and possesio, of Ac.2.00 gtl;. of land in s'No'817/53, paronch;r Viilage d rt,lunori, District as ilregar, arbitrary, unreas;<>nabre-, and arso vi;rativ;;ilhe-provisions cf A.p. (T.A.) Land Revenue Act 1317 r particutartv s"..' iid-s of the said r ct and arso viorative of Articres 14 21. and soo-n orlh; iJi.iitrtion of rndia and issue a consequentiar direction to the 2nd respondent r,"r"i"'t" dispose of thr: above said Revision petitions firec by tr," pdtition"i' and further direct the ghrdrrdri-Kothaguden 'i"ntr*nn - respondents herein not to interfere with petitioners possession and enjoyment of the above said land pending disposal of the above Revision petitions ritJoiuy tne petitioner before the 2nd respondent herein l.A. NO: 1OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 10325 oF 20171 Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the direct the respondents herein not to interfere with ietitioner's possession and enjoyment of Ac.2.00 gts. of land in s.No.g l71 53 paloncha Village and Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KIRAN REDDy MALLARAPU Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE WRIT PETITION NO: 8352 0F 2017: Between: Katireddy Nagamani, w/o late Lakshma Reddy, aqed about 4i Housewife, rlo. 20-5-76, Contractors Colony, 'Nevi paloncha, Kothagudem District. yrs. Occ Bhadradri- ...PETITIONER AND 1 Stgle. of Telang_ana, rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Government ot I elangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. If,g Pi"!riC! Collector, Bhadra_dri-Kothgudem District, Kothagudem (eartier District Collector, Khammam District al Khammam. J 4 The Joint Collector, Bhadradri Kothagudem District at Kothagudem. The Revenue DiVisional Officer, Kothagudem, BhadradriKothagudem District. The Tahsildar,'Paloncha Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent herein in not disposing of the Revision petitions filed by the petitioner on 20-g- 2014 under sec.166-8 of A.P. (T.A.) Land Revenue Act, 1317 F questioning the inaction of the Sth respondent herein in not rectifying entries in the pahanies by entering petitioners name as owner and possessor of Ac.4.1g gts. of land in S.No.817/72, Paloncha village and Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudern District and also Ac.4.'10 gts of land in S.No.8'17173, Paloncha Village and Mandal, Bhadradri- Kothaggudem District as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, and also violative of the provisions of A. P. (T.A. ) Land Revenue Act 13 i 7 F particularly Sec. .l 66-8 of the said Act and also violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Con:,titution of lndia and issue a conseqrrential direction to the 2nd respondent hereirr to dispose of the above said Revision Petitions filed by the petitioner forthwith ar d further direct the respondents hererin not to interfere with petitioners possessioq and enjoyment of the above said lar cls pending disposal of the above Revision P,ltitions filed by the petitioner before .he 2nd respondent herein. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(VrlPMP. NO: 10331 OF 2017) Petition under Siection 151 CPC praying that in the circumst rnces stdted in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the responderrts herein not to interfere with petitioner's p ossession and enjoyment of Ac.4.1t gts. of land in S.No. 817172, Paloncha 'y'illai:e and Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudern District and also Ac.1.10 gts of land ir S.No.817/73, Paloncha Village anc [r/andal, Bhadradri-Kothaggudem District, pe,nding disposal of the above writ peti icn. Counsel for the Petilioner: SRI KIRAN REDDY MALLARAPU Counsel for the Resl)ondents: GP FOR REVENUE WRIT PETITION NO: 8413 OF 2017:. Between Katireddy Ven <,ateswara Reddy, s/o Kotireddy, aged abor, t 50 yrs. Occ Agriculture, r/o Fl.No. 20-5-81 , Contractors Colony, New Palon;ha, Bhadradri- Kothagudem D strict. ..PETITIONER AND 1 State of Telangana, rep.by its Secretary, Revenue Department Government of Telangana, Siecretariat, Hyderabad. , a 4 The District Collector, Bhadradri-Kothgudem'District, Kothagud,:m (earlier District ColleCtcr, Khammam District at Khammam. The Joint Coller;1or, Bhadradri Kothagudem District at Kotlragu< em. The Revenue E i'risional Officer, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kotha ludem District The Tahsildar, I)aloncha Mandal, Bhadradri- Kothagudem Distr ct. ..R[:SPONDENTS Petition under hrticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia pray ng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High ()ourt may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring declaring the inaction of the 2r'd respondent herein in not disposirrg of the Revision Petitions filed by the petit cner on 20-g- 2014 under sec.166-ll of A.P. (T.A.) Land Revenue Act, 1317 F qrestioning the inaction of the Sth rer;pondent herein in not rectifying entries in th > pahaniel by entering petitioners r ame as owner and possessor of Ac-2.32 c ts. of land in S.No.B17153, Paloncha Village and Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, and atso violative of the provisions of A.P.'(T'A.) Land Revenue Act 1317 F particularly Sec. '166-8 of the said Act and also violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and issue a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent herein to dispose of the above said Revision Petition filed by the petitioner forthwith and further direct the respondents herein not to interfere with petitioners possession and enjoyment of the above said land pending disposal of the above Bevision Petitions filed by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent herein. l.A. NO: 1OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 10413OF 20171 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to interfere with Petitioner's possession and enjoyment of Ac.2.32 gts. of land in S.No.B17153 Paloncha Village and Mandal, Bhad radri-Kothagudem District, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KIRAN REDDY MALLARAPU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER SK,J W.P.No.8348 of 2017 and :atch HOI\I'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH ' WRIT PETITION Nos.8348, 8350. 8352 and 84L3'of 2OL7 ' COMMON ORDER: As all tht:se writ petitions arise out of com'non issue, they are being disposed of by this common or,ier.

2. A1l these rvrit petitions are filed seeking to declare the action of rhe respondent No.2-District Collectcr in not disposing of the revision petitions lited by the petitioners on 20.O8.2O14 under Section 166-E, of A.P.(T.A.) Lar,<l Revenue Act, l3l7 F arcl r-lso questioning th,: action of the respondent No.S-Tahsi dar in not rectifyin5l the entries in the pahanies by ente.ing the name of th: petitioners as owners and possessors of the subject la:rds situated at pa_loncha Vitlage urd Mandal, Bhadlzrdri-Kothagudem District, as illegal rnd arbitrary. t I 2 SK,J W.P.No.8348 of 2017 and batch

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners filed revision petitions on 2O.O8.2O14 before the respondent No.2 under Section 166-8 of A.P.(T.A.) Land Revenue Act, 1317 F to rectifr the entries in the pa-hanies of the petitioners in respect of the subject properties respectively, however, till date no action has been taken and requested to direct the respondent No.2 to dispose of the said revision petitions as per law.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, submits that the said revls10n petitions filed by the petitioners are still pending for consideration before the respondent No.2 t and re{uested to pass appropriate order. J SK,J W.P.No.8348 of 201'7 and batch

6. In view ,tf the submissions of the iearned colrnsel for both sidesr, without going into the merits o.' the mater, the Writ Petitions are disposed of directinll the respondent Nr>.2-District Collector to dispose ol the revision petiti,)ns hled by the petitioners on 20.08.1)014 within six (6) "veeks from the date of receipt of a co.:ty of this order. Tii disposal of the said revision petit.ons, the responderrts are directed not to interfere with the possession c,l' the petitioners over the su1>ject properties. No rtrder as to costs. 7 . Misceliar eous applications, if any pendin5,, 1n these writ petit.,ons, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- L. Lr\KSHMI BABU A$ SISTANI- REGISTRAR SEC]'ION OFFICER To,

1. The Secretary, Revenue Department, State of T 2. The District Collector, Bhadradri-Kothgudem District, Kothagud,:m (earlier Telangana. Ser;retariat, Hyderabad. ngana, Gov,:rnment of a District Collectcr, Khammam District at Khammam.

3. The Joint Colle,;tor, BhadradriKothagudem District at Kothagudem. 4. The Revenue E,ivisional Officer, Kothagudem, BhadradriKothag;udem District 5. The Tahsildar, raloncha Mandal, Bhadradri- Kothagudem Distr ct. 6. One CC to SRI I(IRAN REDDY MALLARAPU, Advocate [OPUO] 7. Two CCs to GF =OR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Te,langana.

8. Two CD Copies BN , GJP -f-frr" I HIGH COURT DATED:0610312025 COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.8348, 8350, 8352 & 8413 of 2017 I \ \ , , ,i a .. -i \,.,:. ?ri5 z a l: r I' t, ( .,1 : ,..,,rE- Ll DISPOSING OF ALL THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS i 4[a,r

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments