SRI B. BAPESH VARDHAN, REI' IESENTING SRI v. VENKATA KUll AR
Case Details
Acts & Sections
'1 . Sri.Gone Srinivas Rao S/o Sri.Surya Rao, Aged about: 55 years, Occ: Business Rl/o. H.No.'1 5-21-78, Balaii Nagar, Kukatpally Hyderabad, Telangana-500072
2. Smt.Gone Roopa Wo. Sri. Gone Srinivas Rao, Aged about: 50 years, Occ: Business FJo. H.No.1 5-21-78, Balaji Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad' Telangana-500072 ...PETITIONERS AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Stamps and Registration) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner and lnspector General (Stamps and Registrations) 51Q- 953, Nizam Shahi Road, Mbzamjahi Markef, Herza Estate, Risala Abdullah Colony, Jam Bagh, Hyderabad, Telangana 500095.
3. The District Registrar, Medchal-lMalkaigiri District lVledchal, Telangana 4. The Sub-Registrar, Quthbullapur, At Suiaram Medchal-Malka.lgiri District. Telangana
5. J.Vamsi Krishna, S/o J.Boyi Reddy, Aged about 38 years, Occ: Business, Fl/o Plot No.33, SBH Colony, Srinagar Colony post, Hyderabad - 500073.
6. K.V.Sesha Reddy, S/o Late K.Pitchi Reddy, Aged about 63.years'.Occ: Business, R/o Plot No.33, SBH Colony, Srinagar Colony Post, Hyderabad - 500073 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of IMANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in issuing the Prohibited Properties Register dated.06-12-2022 of Prohibited Transfer of Property i.e., Agricultural Land Admeasuring Ac.4.20 Gunterr, in Survey No'537 situated at. Bowrampet Village, Qutubullapur Mandal, Medcl- rl-Malkajgiri District (Erstwhile Ranga Reddy District) in contemplation to the t-, tter dt. 3011112022 issued by the Respondent No.5 and 6 pertaining to the f etitioner's Property against to the orders in case No. ST. No. 216/RDO (t\A)1532,i 021, dt. 2610612021 on the file of The special Tribunal, Medchal-Malkajg ir District, while not considering the representation ol the Petitioners dated 10- t8-2023 is not only illegal, arbitrary, unlawful, unconstitutional, against,to the I rinciples of natural justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under section 151 CPC praying .that in the circ lmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the Respondent No. 4 to suspend the captioned F rohibited Properties Register dated. OGl12l2O22 as Prohibited to Transfer of Pr 'perty' pertaining to Petitioners Property i.e., Agricultural Land Admeasuring \c.4.20 Guntas, in Survey No.537 situated at Bowrampet Village, Qutubull;r 'ur [t/andal, Ranga Reddy District, vide Registered Document No. 9254/20111 dated. 2810712012, pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirr :mstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to withdraw the above said Writ petition No.22415 of 2023 as Nl( )T PRESSED. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B. BAPESH VARDHAN, REI' IESENTING SRI V. VENKATA KUll AR Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: SMT. DARA HARIl'l lA KIRAN, AGP FOR STAMPS I\ ID REGISTRATION Counsel for the Respondents No.5 & 6: SRI ROHITH POGL I A The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SHRJ JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI WRIT PETITION No.22415 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filcd seeking the following prayer: '... to issue a Writ, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in issuing the Prohibited Properties Regster dated 06.12.2022 of "Prohibited Transfer of Property" i.e., Agricultural Lald Admeasuring Ac.4- 2O Guntas, in Survey No.537 situated at Bowrampet Village, Qutubullapur Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District (Erstwhile Ranga Reddy District) in contemplaLion to the Letter dt 30/ 1 I /2022 issued by the Respondent No.5 and 6 pertaining to the Petitioner's Property against to the orders in Case No.ST.No.216l RDO (M)/s32l2o21 dt 2610612021 on the file of The Special Tnbunal, Medchal- Mafkajgiri District, while not considering the representation of the Petitioners dated 1O.O8.2O23 is not only illegal, arbitrary, unlawful, unconstitutiona-I, against to the principles of natural justice as such to pass order or orders..."
2. Heard Mr. B.Bapesh Vardhan, learned counsel representing Mr.V.Venkata Kuma-r, learned Counsel for petitioners, Mrs.Dara Haritha Kiran, Iearned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for respondent Nos. I to 4 and Mr.Rohith Pogula, learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 and 6
3. I.A.No.l of 2025 is hled with the following prayer 2 t ".. .may be pleased to rvithdraw the above sarr ,\'rit Petition No.22415 of 2023 as NOT PRESSED ar I to pass such other order or orders..." 4 In the affidavit attached wrth I.A.No.1 rt 2025 it is reflected as follo'vs: "2. It is humbly submitted that this preser r Petition is filed before the Hon ble Court praying t ) a Writ, order or orders more particularly one i nature o[ Wnt of MANDAMUS declaring the actior Respondent No-4 in issuing the Prohibited Prof Regisrer dated 06-12-2022 of "Prohibited Tran; Propert]/ i.e.. Agncultural Land Admeasuring ,', Gunas, in Suruey llo.537 situated at: Bowrampct '/ Qutubullapur Mandal, Machal-Malkajgiri l) (Erstrvhile Ranga Reddy District) in contemplation Letter it. 30/ll12022 issued by the Respondent Nr. 6 pertarnrng to the Petitioner's Property against t orders in Case No. ST. No.2I6IRDO lMll532l2O.) 26106 /2O21 on the iile of The Special Tribunal, It,lr r Malkajgrn District, rvhile not considering representation oI the Petitioners dated 10-08-2023 only illegal, arbitrarl', unlas,ful, against to the pr-i I of natural just ice; Writ ISS UC ,f thc )rties rr of 4 .20 lage, ;tricl r thr: , anrl ) th{l , dt. :hal i not:
3. It is humbi_r' submitted that while the said wrrt pr is pending the Petitioners had sorted out the matt(:l the Respondents, as such the Petitioners are not i to pursue the said writ petition further agains Respondents, in view of the same, the Petitionrr rvithdrarving the above said Writ Petition as PRESSED, as such this Hon'ble Court may be plr:r : rvithdrarv the Writ Petition as Not Pressed.' NOT :(l to
5. In view of the affidavit liled stating that vvr t petitioners are not intending to pursue the matter, it is r: luested that writ petition be closed as not pressed.
6. In view of the averments made in the I.A.. ,Vrit Petition stands closed as not pressed. ,f 3 wp 22415 242, Miscella:reous petitions, pending if any, sha,ll stand ciosed. There shall be no order as to costs SDi.MOHD. ISM DEPUTY REGI R \ To //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFTCER
1. One CC to SRI V. VENKATA KUMAR, Advocate [O 2. Two CCs to GP for Stamps and Registration, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
3. One CC to SRI ROHITH POGULA, Advocate tOpUCI 4. Two CD Copies MP BS ,M/ ) t I HIGH COURT DAT iD:2611112025 t + () f 16 -a,../ ',, ORDER WP.No.22415 of 2023 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITTON AS T\I)T PRESSED WIT{OUT COSTS //> \2 )r(