Sri.Maram Harsha Vardhan Reddv v. IIB^ffT"", in chier, noiai-ini-E;Idilil''b""prrtment Hyderabad, The superintendino Enoineer, Roads and Buirdings Department
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Sri. Maram Harsha Vardhan Reddv H-No.5-1-627lt, Ftat No. c2,-Vi;; Khammam District. S/o. B yak N iksham_Reddy, aged 55 years, RIo. rvas, Kaviraj Nagar, Rdad No. 1, AND ...PETITIONER
3. 4 5 f) 7 B t%["€!??:i#:,'i"Iffi *"""i,'['"o31]iHlHfl ,5;]i:f#;0"$"",,rrrinesand IIB^ffT"", in chier, noiai-ini-E;Idilil''b""prrtment Hyderabad, The superintendino Enoineer, Roads and Buirdings Department, circre- Nalgonda. The Executive Enqineer. Roads and Buildings Department, Nalgonda. The Executive Endineer Roads and B;;il;;d; E"Friiiiil"t, suryapet Pay Accounts Offiier, Naloonoa. Assistant Pay Accounts Ofticer. Survaoet urrector of Works Accounts, Tetanganb State, Hyderabad . -..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, decraring the action of the respondents in contemprating to deduct permit fee stipurated under G.o. Ms. No. 21 dated 31-03-2022 from the biils payable to the petitioner company in reration to the works being executed by the petitioner company vide 'r) Agreement No.81t2022-2023 dated 15-03-2023, 2) Agreement No.8212022-2023 dated 1 s-03-2o23, 3) Agreement No.33t2023-2o24 dated 27-05-2023, 4) Agreement No.37r2o23-2024 dated os-o6-2023, 5) Agreement No.7 gr2o23-2o24 dated 2z-og-2023, 6) Agreement No.9412023-2024 dated 12-12-2023 and 7) Agreement No.21t2o24- 2025 dated 15-07-2024 under respondent Nos.3 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary the terms and conditions of the respective agreements and further direct the respondents not to deduct any amounts titted as Permit Fee vide Go lvts.21 dated 31-Ct3-2022: from the Bills payable to the pertitioner company by the respondents under the respective agreements lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition undr:r Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cor.rrt may be pleased to grant interim direclions restraining the Respondents from making any deductions towards purported Permit Fee from Running Bills arising out execution of work pursuant to the vide 1) Agreement No.8112O22-2O23 daled 15-03-2023' 2) Agreement No 821'.>-022-2023 dated 15-03-2023,3) Agreernent N)3512023-2024 daled 27-05-2.023, 4) Agreement No.3712023-2024 daled Cr5-06-2023, 5) Agreement No79t',2O23-2024 daled 22-09-2023,6) Agreernent Nr>.9412023-2024 dated 12-12-2023 and 7) Agreement No.2112O24-2025 dated 1i5-07-2o24undet respondent Nos.3 i:warded in favour of the'Petitioner compiany Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. LINGAMPELLY RAVINDER Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2to5: GP FOR ROADS AND BUILDINGS Counsel for the Resporident Nos. 6to8: GP FOR FINANCE The Court made the following:
ORDER :
ry : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT PETITION No.21357 OF 2024 ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul) Sri L.Ravinder, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner filed a letter dated 13.02.2025 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2. In view of the aforesaid letter, this Writ Petition is listed under the caption "for withdrawal"
3. Permission as sought for is accorded
Operative part
4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SDI K. AMMAJI SI TANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, i I I t- ad, Telangana.
The Principal Secretary, .'Mines and Minerals Department' State Secreta , ?iltL"r;,1;?;*iio"3n13t Roads and Buirdinss Department Hvderab 3. The Superintendrng rngineer' Roads and Buildings Department' Circle- , |ftlngl!3*ive Engineer, Roads and Buirdinss Department, Nalsonda. 5 rhe Executive Engineer, Hffi;;il B;iEi;dr Defartment, suryapet 6. P;; Ailr; ts offi-cer, Nalsonda' ; it6 A;;ttr;i Pav Accoun-ts officer' Suryapet' gtxiflirs#'"{i:51a:iffii1lli}^ffi'11"tr8il?#fl""l""','f '" i"linqin, at HYderabad, [OUTIE, t1.Two CCs to GP FoR t Hvderabad [OUTI z Two CCs to GP F Telangana, at HYd ?J-nes,a,e., High Court for the State of Telangana, at ADS AND BUILDINGS, High Court for the State of OR RO erabad 1
Two CD CoPies HIGH COURT DATED:1810212025 ORDER WP.No.21357 of 2024 /4_ _-==: - :::- l* i 0 / APH 2025 ( 1:. t (') q ) -t'+ * l.i5 n,r,r c \-::: DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 12 Dec 2023. The bench was SUJOY PAUL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.