'1 . Gandhasiri Ramesh, Sio. Gandhasiri B S a m v. 1. The State of Telangana

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to pass an order, direction' Writ more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus. A) By declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the action of the 1'r and 2nd respondents in not including the petitioners herein in to the fold of HR Policy of Fixed Tenure Employees of Society for Rural Development Services, O/o Commissioner, Rural Development as extended to thesimilarlysituatedpersonssince0l/04/2008viz-Computeroperatorsworking on consolidated basis in DWMAs/CLRC vide the Sth Respondent Proceedings representing to the No.7759lSRDS/HR/09 dated 21111t2O09, inspite of representations dated respondent repeatedly by the petitioners herein vide 2Bt1ol2o1o' 2gt07t2013,25t11t2013, 3ot11t2o13,2glo5t2o25 at 3010512025, and despite of recommendations made to the 2nd Respondent by the Project Director' DWMA, Nalgonda vide 06/10/20'16, and bY the 20tO3t2O13, is as highly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory' unlust' improper apart from being contrary to all principles of natural justice and rn violation of Articles 14,16and2loftheConstitutionoflndia,andB)furtherdeclarethatallthe petitioners herein are entitled to include in to the fold of HR Policy with all consequentialbenefitsandmonetarybenefitsetc',onparwiththesimilarly situatedstaffviz,Computeroperatorsworkingonconsolidatedbasiswhowere extendedthebenefitofHRPolicysince0l/04i200Bvidethe5thRespondent Proceed ings No. 77 59/SRDS/H R/09 dated 21 I 1 1 12009' letter dated 22t1012010, 1011212013. 3rd Respondent vide letters dated 26-03-2011 3110812014 t.A .NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents more particularly the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the latest representations dated .2glo5t2o25 and 3010512025 of the petitioners by taking into consider of the recommendations made by the 3rd Respondent vide letters dated 2610312011,2OtO3l2O13, 1110712016 and September,2017 and 1o include them in to the fold of HR Poicy of Fixed Tenure Employees of society for Rural Development Services, O/o Commissioner, Rural Development on par with the similarly situated staff viz Computer bases in DWMA/CL.RC who were extend OllO4l2OOB vide the sth Respondent Proce 21t11t2OOg with all consequential benefi disposal of the above writ petltion. perators working on consolidated d the benefit of HR Policy since dings No 7759/5RDS/HRX9 dated and monetarY benefits Pending Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI ARVIND K MAR KATA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR SERVICES - I! Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : M FOR DRDA . R.PADMA REKHA, LEARNED G.P The Court at the stage of admission made e following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.2O639 OF 2025 ORDER: Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Kata, learned counsel appearing fur the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Services-Il appearing for respondent No.1 and Ms.R. Padma Rekha, learnecl Government Pleader for DRDA appearing lbr respondent Nos.2 to 5 and perused the material available on record

2. The present writ petition is hled aggrievecl by the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 5 for not including the petitioners into the fold of HR Policy of Flxed Tenure Employees of Society for Rura-l Development Services, AS extended to the Computer Operators working consolidatecl basis like petitioners herein in the office of Project Director, District Water Management Agency (DWMA), and Cluster Level Resources Center (CLRC), Nalgonda vide 5th respondent proceedings \-- RRN,J W. P. No 20639 of2O25 \ 2 No.7759lSRDS/HR/09 dated 2lll.2OO9 inspite of representing to the resPond nts repeatedly by the petitioncrs vide rePresentati ns dated 28.lO.2OLO,

29.O7.2013, 25.t1.20t3, 30. 1 .2013, 29.O5.2025 and

30.O5.2025 with a request to ext nd the benefit of HR policy of Fixed Tenure EmploYees to the petitioners on par with the Computer OPerators working in the office of Project Director, District Water Manage nt Agency (DWMA).

3. Learned counsel for the etitioner submitted that initially the petitioners were a pointed on consolidated basis in the District Rural Dev lopment Agency (DRDA), Drought Prone Area Programm (DPAP), District Water Management AgencY (DWMA) an Cluster Level Resources Centers (CLRC) in Nalgonda Dis ict of the Combined State of Andhra Pradesh, before the plementation of National Rural Employment Guarantee petitioners herein are worki Scheme (NREGS). The g in their respective departments on par with the Co puter Operators working RItN,J \t I' No-20639 of 2025 -) on consolidated basis in DWMA/CLRC. After bilurcation of Combined State of Andhra Pradesh the petitioners herein are posted to Suryapet Distr-ict and continuing presently in the same District. He [urther submitted that some of the Computer Operators u,hr> were also appointed consolidated basis along with the petitioners herein were brought into the lold of HR Policy of Fixed Tenure Employees of Society lor Rural Development Services vide 5th respondent proceedings No.7759/SRDS/HR/09 dated

21.11.2OO9, as such, the petitioners herein are also entitled to include into the fold of I{R Policy and to treat as Fixed Tenure Employees on par with Computer Operators.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that as the petitior-rers herein are not includecl under HR Policy the.y submitted representations dated 28.10.2010,

29.O7 .2013, 25.11.2013, 30. Il.2Ol3, 29.O5.2025 and

30.05.202.5 to respondernts lvith a request to extend the benefit of HR policy ol Fixed Tenure Emplovees to the 4 RRN,.' W P.No.20639 oI202.r petitioners on Par with C respondent authorities did n mputer Operators. But, t act upon the same. Aggricvcd by the same, the Prese t writ petition is filed.

5. Lcarned counsel aPpear g for the respondents submitted thaL the resPonde representations dated 29.O5. ts would consider the 2025 and 30.05.2025, submitted brv the Petitioners and ass appropriate orders, rn accordance '"vith law.

6. Having considered the s bmissions made by the Iearned counsel for the resPecti authorities are directed to co dated 29.O5.2025 and 30.05. parties, the respondents sider the representations o25, submitted by the petitioners with a request to exte d the beneht of HR policy on par with the ComPutet' OPera ors, and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, thin a period of six (O6) weeks from the date of receiPt of copy of this order. ) RRN,.,, w.P No.20639 of 2025

7. With the Erbove direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of, at the admissron stage itself. No order as to costs. As a sequcl, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-A. SRINIVAS qTA NT RE A REDDY GISTRAR ASS \\ \ I SECTION OFFICER To SA BS

1. The Principal Secretary, (Vice Chairman SRDS, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, T.S. Secretariat Buildings, State of Telangana at Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, (Chief Executive Officer SRDS, Hyd) Door No.6-3-607, Anandanagar Colony, Khai(abad, Hyderabad - 500004, Telangana State

3. The District Collector and Magistrate, Suryapet, Suryapet District, T.S. 4. The District Rural Development Officer, District Rural Development Agency (DRDA), Suryapet, Surpyapet District, T.S.

5. The Member Secretary, Panchayat Ra1 and R.rai Development Department, Society for Rural Development Services, Door No.6-3-607, Anandanagar Colony, Khairtabad, Hyderabad - 500004, Telangana State.

6. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES -ll, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. One CC to SRI ARVIND KUMAR KATA, Advocate [OPUC] B. One CC to [Vls R PADNIA REKHA, LEARNED G.P FOR DRDA, Advocate (OPUC)

9. Two CD Copies $ HIGH COURT DATED:2 210712025 ORDER WP.No.20639 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P o ( S r c ,. a l31 U E c o 4o TA \) t1 WITHOUT COSTS. I @q' a $