The High Court · 2025

5. Smt. Akula Soulanya, W/o A. Sai Chand Aged aboqt. 32 years,.occ. .House Wife F/o L.B. Nigai, Hyderabad (Sister-inJaw of the Respondent No. 2) 6. A. Mukund Rao, S/o. Late Buchaiah Aged about.60 years. occ. Business FUo L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad (Relative of the Petitioners) PETITIONER/ACCUSEDS in l.A.No'3/2025 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by the Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana.

2. Smt S. Sravya, W/o Gangisetty Sai Kiran Aged about. 25 years, occ. Housewife Fl/o H.No. 2-2-185A011. Ramakrishna Nagar Bagh Amberpet. ...RESPONDENT/COMPI-AINANTS in l.A.No.3/2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the FIR No.108 of 2025, dated o8.o7.2025 on the file of the Women PS, East Zone (Hyderabad). l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS., praying that r the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition .he High Court may be pleased to stay all further investigation, including arresi rf the Petitioners in FIR No.1OB of 2O25, dated 08.07.2025 on the file of the Wc nen PS, East Zone (Hyderabad) pending disposal of the Criminal Petition. l.A. NO: 3OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS., praying that irthe circumstances stated in the permission petition, the High Court may be 1,1 :ased to permit the Petitioners/Accused and the 2nd Respondent herein to coml) 'und the offences in FIR No. 108 ot 2025, dated: 08-07-2025 on the file of the Wt nren PS, East Zone (Hyderabad) and pass any other orders as this Hon'ble Cou- may deem fit in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 : Between: Smt S. Sravya, W/o Gangisetty Sai Kiran Aged about. 2li years, oc-c. Housewife Rl/o H.No. 2-2-18514011. Ramakrishna Nagar iagh Amberpet, Hyderabad. Petitioner/Flr spondent No.2 AND

1. Gangishetty Sai Kiran, S/o. G. Satyan aruyana Aged z rout. 33 years, _Occ. Pvt. Employee H.No. 9-2-1 15. Nager House, Hydera I rd (Husband of the Respondent No. 1)

2. G. Satynarayana, S/o Late G. Ramchander Aged trl out. 60 years, _Occ. Business-H.No. 9-2-1 15, Nager House, Hyderabad r ather-in-law of the Respondent No. 2)

3. Smt G. Sharadda, Wo G. Satynarayana Aged about. t i years, Occ. House Hold H.No. 9-2-115, Nager House, Hyderabad (rr rther-in-law of the Respondent No. 2)

4. G. Sampath, S/o G. Satynarayana Aged about. 30 H.No. 9-2-115, Nager House, Hyderabad (Brother-in-L No. 2) v r,ars. Occ. Business 'of the Respondent

5. Smt. Akula Soujanya, W/o A. Sai Chand Aged about. : 2 years, occ. House Wife R/o L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad (Sister-in-law of the Rer; ondent No. 2)

6. Mukund Rao, S/o. Late Buchaiah Aged about.60 year . occ. Business Rl/o L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad (Relative of the Petitioners). PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS ' +:|,fj]iTf relansana, Represented by the pubric prosecutor Hish court of Petition under section 359(2) of.BNSS., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit and joint memo of .o,nprtililr petition, the High court may be pleased to record the compromi." .t"iuruni-and. quash the_ proceedings against the Accused oersons_(petition"r.-in'it u"present criminal petition) in FIR daied: o8-,i-iiir;';;i;;"fi"T the women ps, East Zone [";rl?irllr"25, This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri S NAGESH REDDY, Advocate for the petitioners and tt,""noot. puotic prosecutor on beharf *"' and or sri Atur Kumar Asa*ar, Advocate r;;;. [Ji:,ff1',::T:t The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF'T }LANG/INA AT IIYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SR.EE NTVAS RAO I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 IN AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.8892 of 2)25 Date:24.L2.2o25 Between: Gangishetty Sai Kiran and hve others. AND The State of Telangana, represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, and another Petitioners Rcspondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filed by th(l l(.ti[ioners seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR No. I08. of 2O,),:; of Women police Station, East Zone, Hyderabad, registered for tl: offences under Scctions 85, 318(4), 316(2) of rhe Bharatiya Nyayzr I ztnhita, 2023 and Sections 3, 4 and 6 of the Dowrv prohibition Act.

2. Heard Mr.S.Nagesh Reddy, learned counsel r r the petitioners, Mr.Atul Kumar Agarwal, learned counsel for rcs I r rdent No.2 and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Iearned Additional [ .-l blic prosecutor, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1-State. 2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that during the pendency of the present Criminal petition, at the instance of the well wishers, relatives and elders, the parties have settled the disputes pending between them and entered inlo compromise and liled Joint Memo. Accordingly, the parties have hled I_A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2O2S seeking permission to compound the offences and to record the compromise respectively. 4. This Court uid_e order, dated I 9. L2 .2025, directed the parties i.e., the petitioners and respondent No.2, to appear before the High court l,egal services committee, Hyderabad, on or before 22.12.2o2s. In compliance of the said order, the Secrctary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report, dared 22.I2.2025, stating that the petitioners and respondent No.2 rvere duly identified with copies of their Aadhar Cards/Voter ID Card , [t is further stated that the parties have willfulry and without any coercion entered into compromise.

5. In view of the said report and also in view of the compromise entered between the petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as the submissions made by the respectivc parries, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2oi| are allowed. consequentry, the proceedings in FIR No.log of 2o2s of Women Police Station, East Zone, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed against the petitioners. 3

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowetl ' ;ubject to payment of costs of Rs'1O,OOO/- (Rupees ten thousand 66lrr rs the High Court kgal Services Committee' Hyderabad' and Rs' ir ( i)O / - (Rupees five thousand onlv) to the Telangana High Court Arl''' c:ates Association' Hyderabad, by the petitioners' on or before 09 'Ol '2( 26' Miscellaneousapplications,pendingifany'sIrllst,andclosed. ASS srAN?fl'B't#R[f ,/ G' /ITRUE COPY'/ SECTION OFFTCER I To i g3;,;ii,tr;,ffip#=*"r+,fr:il'".'t* :" -." ., 5. Two CD CoPies " iniJ"g *iitt Joint Memo of compromise) l-il/ Xoru, rhe totar an amount orRs.r5,000r t*T*",10f",*iti:l ::1,'.lil"::Ito':"" the High )ourt Legal Servtces as ordered Rs.10,000/- i"tU;";';;t#:'lto Committee and Rs 5,txr0l- iRup"t' five thousand^ onlv) to the gh Court Advocatcs * p,ooroi"ompliance I ; Sri S Nagcsh Rcddv' Association and a Cost -^:il'ilfi;;r"a ;;;;;;i", vide USSR N 20 83 t 2026' dt'07'01'202s' HIGH COURT DATED:2411212025 ORDER lA.NOs.3 AND 4 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.8892 of 2025 \ 1', * T t ,i, "l 't | -:,i1, l;i i.),'/ P4 'r )l ALLOWING THU, I.A.s & CRLP J i I BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, AT: HYDERABAD I I BETWEEN: 8?,9e _OF2025 CRLPNO. I 2 3 4 5 6 Gangishetry Sai Kiran, S/o G. Satyanarayana Aged about: 33 years,'Occ: Art. Employee H.No. 9-2-I I5, Nager HouSe,lHyderabad (Husband of the ResporidentNo. 1) G. Satynarayana S/o Late G. Ramchander Aged about: 60 years, Occ: Business H.No. 9-2- I 1 5, Nagei $ggs.p,.|lyderabad (father-in-law of the Responderit No. 2) Sr,nt G. Sharadda lY/o G. Satynarayana Aged about: 55 years, O-cc: House Hold H.No. 9-2-l15, Ndger House, Hyderabad (mother-in-law. of the.,Respondent No. 2) G. Sarnpith S/o G. Satynarayana Aged about: 30 years, Occ: Business H.No. 9-2- I 15, Nager Horrse, 'Hyderabad (Brother-in-Law of th9 Regpo.n{gnl No. 2) Smt. Akula Soqianya Wo A. $ai Chand Aged about: 32 years, occ: Hotse Wife R/o L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad Sister-in-law(Sister-inlaw of the Respondent No. 2) A. Mukund Rao S/o Late Buchaiah Aged about:60 years, occ: Busiress . ..... PETITIONERS R/o L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad (Relative of the Petitioners) AND The State of 'l'elangana Represented by the Public Prosecutor High Court ol Telangana.

2. Smt S. Sravya Wo Gangisetty Sai Kiran Aged about: 25 years, occ: Houservife R/o H.No. 2-2-185/40/1, Ramakrishna Nagar Bagh Ambe4ret. JOINTMEMO RESPONDENTS The present criminal petition is filed seeking to quas L the proceedings in FI R No. I 08 of 2025, dated 08.07 .2025 on the file ol . re Women pS, East Zone (Hyderabad) for the offences under Sections I 5, 318 (4),316 (2\ BNS and Section 3. 4 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition A r r.

2. That pending the dispute, myself and the Petitioner \i . l/Respondent No. l/Accused No. I have entered into an MOU dated it! .10.2025 resolving are disputes and agreeing to file a mutual consent dil rrce and also close the crime herein by filing the present compromise pr:l tion. -1. It is subrnitred that in view of the said MOU dar C 29.10.2025, the continuation of proceedings against the Responc t rts herein would amount to abuse ofprocess of law and hinder the deli. ery ofjustice. I

4. In these circumstances, it is prayed that this Hon,ble Court may be pleased to take the compromise on record and to quash the proceedings against the Accused./Respondents herein, who are the petitioners in the above criminal petition, in the interests ofjustice. In view of the above this Hon'ble court may be pleased to take the present joint memo on record to compound the offences in FIR No.l0g of 2025, dated 08.07.2025 on the file of the women pS, East Zone (Hyderabad) and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances ol the case and in the interests ofjustice. s. syyaL" RESPONDENT NO. 2/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT Y)': PETITIONERS I 2 3 4 5 6 6s)*+ed]'a hWtm%- #/{r4 ?.b/ t{1, COTJNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO. 2/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT - . COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS'@3 DArEl1.tL21zs HYDERABAD .-] HYDERABAD: DISTRICT IN THE HIGH COURI' )F TELANGANA AT: HYDES ABAD CRL.P, NO. OF 2025 JOINTMI MO FILED ON: .10.2025 FILED BY: t fnuL fiu*rflR A Cr6fiurn I L\j39 ADVOI ATES COL'NSEL FO]( T,ETITIONER