The High Court · 2025

Prosecutor, High Court for State of Telangana At Hyderabad.

2. Mahankali Manjula, Wo. M. Sathish, Occ. House Wife. Age. 27 Years, R/o. H.no. 3-5-299/512, Pni Chinna Krishna Thota, Khammam Urban, Khammam, TG - 507 003. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Sectron 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased toto quash the proceedings in Cr.No. 841 of 2025 on the file of Honourable Vl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajg iri District, Uppal at L.B. Nagar agaiost the Petitioner/ Accused and be pleased to pass. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, The High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Cr. No. 841 of 2025 on the file of Honourable Vl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Uppal at L B. Nagar against the Petitioner/Accused including the personal appearance of the Petitioner, (Accused pending disposal of the criminal petition and be pleased to pass ) !, LA. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, The High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner and respondent No.2 who is the defacto- complainant to compound the offence and to allow the abo're Crl.P, against the Cr.No. 841 of 2025 on the file of Honourable Vl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Uppal at L.B. Nagar iind pass l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that i1 the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, fhe High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and compound the crininal case in Cr.No. 841 of 2025 on the file of Honourable Vl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Uppal at L.B. Nagar by recordirg compromise and This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri BAGLEKAR AKASH KUMAR ,Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri. Jithenrler Rao Veeramalla Addl. Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Syed Ahmed Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI l.A.Nos.3 and 4 OF 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.8891 OF 2025 COMMON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS, 2023') seeking quashment of the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in Crime No.841 oI 2025, on the file of learned Vl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at L.B.Nagar

2. The petitioner is arrayed as accused in the Crime No.84'1 of 2025 I registered for the offences punishable under Sections 6a(1) and 305(a) of BNS

3. Heard Mr.Baglekar Akash Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondent No.1-State and Mr.Syed Ahmed, learned counsel for the respondent No.2/de-facto complainant

4. Pending this petition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingly, respondent No.2lde-facto complainant filed l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise and by recording the settlement to quash the proceffiiilgs against the petitioner/accused in Crime No.841 of 2025. 2 N',rR,/ I-A.Nor.) atd 4 of 2025 h/ and Cr/.P.No. 8891 of 2025

5. This Court vide order dated 16.07.2025 referrel the parties to the High Court Legal Services Committee for identificaticn and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement. The Secretarl, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report dated 25.A7.2025 stating that the parties were identified by their respective counsel and also on verification of Aadhar Cards/ldentity Cards and the enquiries revealed that the parties have willfully and without coeroion entered into settlemenVcompromise.

6. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and perused the materials on record.

7. Having considered the allegations, the nature ol charged offences and taking into account the amicable settlement between the parties, in the light of the dictums in Gran Singh v. Sfate of Punjab and anotherl and Anil Mishra y. Sfafe of lJ.P.2; State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and otherss, this Court is of the considered view that quashment of the impugned proceedings in view of .he settlement by exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.l528 of BNSS, 2023, would be in the interest of justice. ' 2012 (1o) scc 303 ' zo24 Irusc t89 3 zors 1s1 scc oaa \ \ 3 NT&/ IANos.) and 4 of 202) ia/ and CrlP.No- 8891 oJ 2025

8. Accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 o'f 2025 are allowed. Consequently, all the proceedings in Crime No.841 of 2025, on the file of learned Vl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at L.B.Nagar, are hereby quashed against the petitioner/accused.

9. closed To, In the above terms, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand SD/- AHMED ABDULLA KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER

1. The Vl Additionar Metroporitan Magistrate, Medchar-Malkajgiri District, Uppar at L.B. Nagar.

2. The Uppal Police Station, Uppal, Rachakonda, Medchal Malkajgiri. 3. One CC to SRt. BAGLEKAR AKASH KUMAR Advocate tOpUCl 4. One CC to Sri Syed Ahmed Advocate tOpUCl 5. One CC to SRt PUBLTC PROSECUTOR Advocate [OUT] Two CD Copies W HIGH COURT DATED:0610812025 ,) a) Otl \\ c\o k 03 sE'2ffi O6:Sn,,,. 1,.. - -7 ' DISPOSSED OFF IA NOS. 3 & 4 OF 2025 ARE ALLOWED IN CRLP.No.8891 ot 2025 q * A (Memorandum of Criminal Petition (U/Sec.528 of BNSS) IN THE HIGH COI]RT OF JUDICATUR.E FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT:: IfYDERABAD Crl.P.No. Of 2025 Against ( Cr. No. 841 of 2025 on the filc of Hon'ble VI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at L.B. Nagarl Between: Shaik Kareem Pasha, S/o. Shaik Khasim Sharcef, a c-<-'. fv\ vo'\e- s--ro-"9!.-o5'*-' Age.30 Years, R-/o. LI.no. 3 -1 6-97 I Cl 5, Venkat Reddy Nagar, Near SV Tailors Ran'ranthapur, Amberpet, Hyderabad TG-5000 I 3. . . . Petitioner/ Accused . 1. The State ofTelangana, ANI) Represented by Police, Uppal Through Public Prosecutor, High Court lor Stare of Telangana at Hydprabad. 2 Mahankali Manjula, Wo. M. Sathish, Age.27 Years, OC-c'- $'-'*e=- '-'-\\e, fuo. H.no. 3-5-2991512, Pilli Chinna Krishna Thota Khammam Urban, Khammam, TG-5 07003. ]OINT MEMO FILED BY THE BOTH PARTIES The above numbered matter was settled out of couft and the Complaint/2"d Respondent agreed to compromise and have no objection to Compound the offence U/Sec. 64(1),305(a) BNS. ...Respondents D Therefore it is prayed that this Hon'ble couft may be pleased to permit the petitioner/Accused, 2'd Respondent to enter into compromise and compound in Cr.No. 841 of 2025 on the file of Hon'ble VI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Uppal at L.B. Negar, fbr the alleged offences UiSec. 64(l), 305(a) BNS , in view of Compronrisc. Hyderabad Date'. 13.01 .2025 ft7*Petitioner: *",&\mi o\ Coun:,cl lor the Petitioner Courrscl lir