1. Sreepathi Jayamma @ Jayaprada W/o Late S. Janardhan Reddy v. 1. State of Telangana

4. Tahsildar Narayanpur, Narayanpur, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District. 5. Sri Goparaju Mallaiah, S/o Late Venkatramaiah, aged 65 years, Occupation: Agriculture, R/o Gujja village, Narayanpur Mandal, (Nalgonda) Yadadri- Bhuvanagiri District, Telangana State-508253. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ln:iia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, th,: High Court may be pleased (c) to issue a writ, order or direction more particu ; 11y a Writ in the nature of fi/andamus declaring the order passed by the Responde.l No ,1 vide Letter No. Bl175612O2O datecl 04.09.2020 confirming the deletion oi P:titioners agricultural land to an extent of Ac. 0.13 gts., in survey number 21315 ,\r: 1 C0 gts.. rn survey number 220114 and Ac. 0.04 gts., in survey number 192'ii and a total extent of Ac. 1.17 gts., situated at Gujja Village, Narayanpur ltrlanda , Yadadri Bhuvanagrri District as illegal and arbitrary and violative of Article 14, i,) 21 lnd 300 A of the Constitution of lndia and also contrary to the Judgmenl c- this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P. No 13895 of 2020 dated 28.08.2020 and c rnsequently direct the Respondent No 4 to issue Pattadar Pass Books and Title [)r,eds in favour of the Petitioner by incorporating the name of Petitioner after r:(;tifying the revenue records by including agricultural lands to an extent of Ac l.'1 -a gts., in survey number 21315, Ac. 1 .00 gts., in survey number 220114 and Ac 0.04 gts.. in survey number 19218 and a total extent of Ac 1 .1 7 gts., situa:.rd at Gujla Village, Narayanpu r lvlandal. . Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District. NOTE: Prayer Portion A and B are Deleted as per Court Or-r er Dated 16.02.2021 in WP No.68 of 2021 . lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section I51 CPC praying that in the c l;L.mstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl rnay be pleased to suspend the entries in the revenue record s/pa ha nies reflectir-g the name of the Respondent No 5 as possessor in respect of agricultural lar.; to an extent of Ac. ffiF--:1 'tr

1.00 gts., in survey number 220114 situated at Gujja Village, Narayanpur Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District pending disposal of the present Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MALIPEDDI SRINIVAS REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: SMT. S. SRAVANTHI, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI DIDUGU GOPALA KRISHNA The Court made the following: ORDER -n*/ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE K S;ARATH WRIT PETITION No.68 of 2O1r..L ORDER: Hearcl Sri Malipeddi Srinivas Reddy, learned counsel for the petitione r, Smt. S. Sravanthi, lear r:d Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue a ltpea ring for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Sri Didugr-r Gr'1,ala Krishna, learned counsel appearing lor respondt,: r - No.5, and per-used the entire material on record.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner stLlrrnits that the petitioner hled the present writ petition seel<irrg 1o declare the order passed by the respondent No. I uirTe Letter No.B/ 1756l2O2O dated 04.O9.2O2O conlirrning the deletion of ltetitioner's agricultural lancl to :Ln extent of Ac.0.13 guntas tn Sy.No.2i3/5, Ac. 1.O ) guntas 1n Sy.No.220/14 and Ac.0.04 guntas in Sy.No 192/B total extent of Ac.1.i7 guntas situated at C,Lrjja Viilage, Narayanpur Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri listrict, AS illegal and arbitrary and also contrary to thc Judgment of 2 this Court passed in W.P.No.i3895 of 2020 dated

28.08.2O2O and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to issue Pattadar Pass Books and Title Deeds in favour of the petitioner after recti$ing thc revenue records by including the subject land.

3. Learned counsel lor the petitioner further submits that on earlier occasion this Court passed order in W.P.No.13895 of 2O2O on 28.O8.2O2O, wherein the respondent No.4-Tahsildar was dirccted to consider the representation submitted by the pctitioner on 09.O7.2O2O and pass necessary orders thereon, duly giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as other interested persons. Despite the same, the respondent No.4 failed to comply with the said orders, therefore, requested to allow the present writ petition.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4, did not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and requested to pass appropriate orders. .........''._

5. After l-rearing both sides and on penr:rinp; the entire material on record, this Court is of the considered v ew that this Court passed orders on '.)-l\.06.2O2O in W.P.No.13895 of 2O2O and the operativc porlion of thc said order. reads as under: "In uicu., of the aboue submissions, the Wnt l,r:tilrrtrt b dlspo.st:d of directing respondent No.4 -'l't.lt sild c,.r to considcr rhe representation submitted bg th.e petitkmar on 09.O7.202O and pass nece-s.s/rrtl or-r1cr.s tttercot t . stictLy in accordance tuitlt ttLu, as exped ittr:usLg as possible, preferablg withh t ct p;:riod of eigltt ueeks from the date of receipt o_l'rt copq of this orcLcr. It is needless to mention that rc.- pondent No.4 bcfore passing anA orders shall put the petitioru:r as tuell as onA other interested p:,,'son:; on rtotic<: uttd giue them an opportunitg of t,r,Lritru. A copll o,f the order passed bg the respondetrt I'to.4 t ,itL be cortrrtttnicated to the parties-"

6. On a perusal of the impugned order dated 04.O9.2O2O passed by respondent No..l uide letter No.B/ 1756,/2O2O, it is evident that there is r-o nrention of any issuan(re of notice to the petitioner or iirly interested persons. It clearly shows that the resp()ndent No.4 without lollorving the order dated 28.08.2020 passed by I I 4 this Court in W.P.No.13895 of 2O2O issued the impugned letter dated 04.09.2020 and the same is 1iab1e to be set aside.

7. Accordingly, this wriL petition is disposed of by setting aside the impugned lerter dated 04.Og.2O2O passed by respondent No.4 and remanding the matter back to the respondent No.4 to follow the orders dated

28.08.2020 passed by this Court in W.p.No.13895 of 2O2O. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. I i //TRUE COPY// D/-A. SRINIVASA REDDY ISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Secretariat Building, Hyderabad Departme n State of Telangana,

2. The District Collector, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, yadadri Bhuvanagiri District.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Choutuppal Division, Choutuppal, yadadri Bhuvanagiri Diskict.

4. The Tahsildar Narayanpur, Narayanpur, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District. 5. One CC to SRI MALIPEDDI SRINIVAS REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. One CC to SRI DIDUGU GOPALA KRISHNA, Advocate IOPUCI 8. Two CD Copies To NlP IQ HIGH COURT DA-l'ED:0410812025 I .) l,i ,. )r. 2 5 ttfll 2P1 \.i \L'r "'.- ' ''; ORDER WF'.No.68 of 2021 DISPOSING OF THE Vr/RlT PETITION WITIHOUT COSTS \\ ?1