The High Court · 2025

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI AJAY KUMAR MADISETTY Counsel for the Respondent No.1 :- Gounsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: SRI N. MOHAN KRISHNA The Court made the following: JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TI LANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE JUSTICE B.R. MADHUSUDII IN RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.79O OF 20L5 DATED THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER. 2 C25 Between: Guguloth Narsimha and another Kondapalli Pullaiah and others JUDGMENT: And Appellants Respondents

1. This M.A.C.M.A. is settled before Lok Adalat vi e Au,ard dated 13.09.2025 passed by the Lok Adalat Bench of Hi Jr Court Legal Ser-vices Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. In vicw of the same, nothing remains n thc prcsent M.A.C.M.A

2. Accordingly, this M.A.C.M.A. is disposed of r terms ol the Award datcd 13.09.2025 passed by the Lok Adalar lench of High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court f,::. the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. There shall be no order as to c:r sts. I 2 Interim order/s if any sha1l stand vacated' Miscellaneous - petition / s shall stand closed' '?t$"'iHfHeE[',R,^X ,ITRUE COPY/' ECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Chairman Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-Cum-lV Additional Distrlct Judge, (FTC) Warangal' One CC to SRI AJAY KUMAR MADTSETTY' Advocate [OPUCI One CC to SRI N MOHAN KRISHNA' Advocate [OPUCI Two CD CoPtes

2. a 4 (Enlosed a copy of Award passed by Lok Adalat) NVB w \ I I \ t i-rE J 14,€ C) tJ * t'1A B 202 {' / zirctlGO { a ' HIGH COURT DATED:0411212025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.790 of 2015 MACMA DISPOSED OF IN TERMS OF AtI'ARD PASSED BY LOK ADALAT KS ,*1,/"" I ) 'th , r ',1 BEFoRETHELoKADALAT \ {, HIGH COURT LEG-AL SERVICES COMAAITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Centrat Act)] ICES "*iThw' fc, l eS Date 13-09-2025 Present:,l. Hon'ble JuStice G.Sri Devi, , (Former Judge of High Court for the State ofTelangana) Chairman

2. Smt.Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member M.A.C.l'{.A.No.79O of 2O1 5 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST M.V.O.P.No.173l08 (On the fite of the Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunat-cum- lV Additionat District Judge (FTC), Warangat) Between:- 1. Gugutoth Narsimha, S/o.Bhadru, age 42 yrs, Occ: Agricutture, 2. Gugutoth Rangamma, W/o.Narsimha, age 35 yrs, Occ: Housewife, (Both are R/o.Dubba Thanda, H/o.Dardapatti (V), Patakurthy (M), Warangat District) ... Petitioners/Appellants AND

1. Kondapalti Puttaiah, S/o.Bheemaiah, aged major, Occ: Owner of the crime Vehicte, R/o.Muthram (V), Patakurthy (M), Warangat District.

2. The l.C.l.C.l Lombard General lnsurance Co., Ltd., Rep. by its Manager, Office at D. No.3-6-365/4/8, Ground Floor, Sama Towers, Opp: Stanza, Liberty Circte, Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad.

3. The l.C.l.C.l Lombard Genera[ lnsurance Co., Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager, Office at 2nd ftoor, Vaddiraju Comptex, Green Square Ptaza, Opp: Pubtic Garden, Hanamkonda, Warangal. (Rl & 2 are not necessary parties) Counsel for Appellants/Ctaimants : Sri M.Ajay Kumar, Advocate/ Sri S.Ugender, Advocate Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 3/ : Sri N.Mohan Krishna, Advocate. , lnsurance Company Representative of lnsurance Company : Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior Manager - Legal Ctaims ... Respondents This appeat having been referred for settlement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and atso the parties, the foltowing award is passed: AIVARD Compensation Awarded by the Tribunat Rs.1 ,82,000/ - (Rupees One takh eighty-two thousand onty) with proportionate costs and subsequent interest @ 9% per annum from the date of petition i.e., 04-01-2008 titt the date of reatization. Il t tompensation Awarded (Setttement Reached) in the Lok Ada(at. SEBViC €5' ^nr \?5 H\Gi:.;.:.Lr:i LoY' '"" I q: ) o (_) I e Nos. 1 Warangat. rs rs an appeal filedby the Petitioners/Ctaimant s aggri ev order passed in MVOp No.173 of 200g by the Motor Accident Tribunat-cum-lV Additionat District Judge (FTC), Warangat. Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior A4anager-Legat Ctaims for th Respondent Nos.2 & 3_lnsurance Company has appeared before the Lok Adatat and represented that the AppelIant/petitioner/Claimant & 2 have appeared before the District Lega( Services Authority, It is reported by the Respondent Nos.2 & 3_lnsuranc e Company that during the pendency of this Appeat, both the parties have mutuatty entered into a compromise and settted the matter. In pursuance of the same the Appettants/petitioners/Ctai manB have agreed to receive an amount of Rs.5,00,OOO / - (Rupees Five takhs onty) towards futt and finat setttement of their ctaim in addition to the amount atready deposited by the lnsurance Company and the lnsurance Company has agreed to pay the same towards fuU and finat setttement of the ctaim. Accordingty, compromise is recorded and the Award is passed befo the Lok Ada [at. ln view of the above said setttement, the lnsurance Company has agreed to deposit the abo weeks rrom rhe date "r,.";:::.il;ffi1.l;::il:: ."#:? the amount that was deposited, if any. ln the event of defau(t or detay in making such deposit, the ctaimants /Appettants /petitioners are entitted to claim interest as awarded by the Tribunat. rtionment of Appo Compensation, if hT poP rt on em n t na d 2 hs a be m a ed A ditional Direction( s): Tn bU an Mn o P No 73 1 t eh A eI na t ht e a r rt on p f 2008 tPe m ne t o en r cla m na t N so t determ ned D ht e v 1 1 2 Th€ Appettants/petitioners are entitted to the refund of court Fee paid in this ]["r,tg:", atready deposited by rhe tnsurance Company, if any, shalt be given

3. Soon after deposit by the lnsurance Company, the Appe,ant/petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are permitted to withdraw their entire share amounts. ln token of consent for the above settfement and award, the parties ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, this cas counsel have signed this award in our presence. disposed of. N /Ctaimant and their e stands i i I I I ) J i : I I I I I I ---'==l-- b Ra"S"nz,.rA dI:r-.g4- ID) ENTIFICA TION REPORT CASE NO n4Ac{1'*1'lz-ots Appeiia'rr ,,, b flI " t+2i1"-i{. !g$tt"J t--{.= r, or),6,}op -,? n,' r.i,l t iie s po t s ) tzr,r., 'lhu I c.Ic J L-rrlo*a G"".r"^4 Lv, g *yn^no* gf Y t( k rutc"yr^5.r lssutr t4,+J-/"1--& ( Gerren A L rNs co st c ooE':- 6i,, c o iEF- ri * NCE ) t, GtcXt -lo({ I €ruoldivt6 sloE) occ-- Ail cr^{rE.e Cry*tf.U^"^, ", e*-Lt} ocd Lwt-p;, tt B"lfi .-'..-e- e0, Du h fl" l,.aJ"^p.k; g vi<ycu,4=/* 5,551, - € r\l l,ryS'ty"hq r cjvrr ag- 57 I 144wL" eR Iw W c'- I hp,-t u4c P ulselfor the Appellant (s) /' a" D-'a l,-'92'': 0u Counsel for the llesp: tdent (s) '\*r CHAIRMAN q :lo(-) seBVIC['5 i.;)' 1! + lhe Sr.a!? .no,*#Q,{i D*r*rffiJl ... WaRat _. af+tlf uAN, vioes A 3AL uthorjty MBI.I 0; ,-a MEY\BI I? N I I I I I i )