The High Court · 2025

High Court may be ection or orde r more : third Respondent in 9 dated '1 .02.2006 as ' and consequentially nt dated 01.02.2006 Petition under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the lircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High C( r rt may be pleased to pass an order to direct the third Respondent to impleme I the order passed in L.G.C. No. 74 of 1999 dated 1 .02.20OO on the file of he first Respondent forthwith Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KISHORE SENTOR COUNS t L RESPESENTTNG Ms. DIWA RAI SOHNI, Atr''OCATE Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following: ORDER -), THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No. 20539 of2o25 ORDER: . Heard Sri Kishore, learned senior counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioners arrd learned Assistart Government Pleader for Assignment appearing for respondents. Perused the record.

2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioner No.1 had filed L.G.C No.74 of 1999 under Section 8(1) of Telangana Larrd Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 to declare the respondents therein as land grabbers arrd to evict them from the schedule property by demolishing the existing structures raised by the respondents and to deliver the vacant possession of the schedule property to the petitioners, and the sarne was decreed in favour of the petitioners on Ol.02.2006. Cha,llenging the said order, writ petition was filed before this Court uide W.P.No.8539 of 2O06. Since the petitioners and respondents in the writ petition have compromised the matter, the said writ petition was dismissed as pithdrawn 2 and the order passed in L.G.C No.74 of 199! has become final.

3. lency of the o 1.06.2016, epealed and tters, vuhich Court for , 1982 (A.P. It is further submitted that during pe I writ petition, as per the G.O.Ms.No. 113, datel the Land Grabbing (prohibition) Act, l9g2 is . the Telangana Land Grabbing (prohibition) A,: Act 72 of 1982) Repeal Order, 2016 and.the rri u,ere unimplemented or pending before ar L- execution as on the date of repealing order transferred to the respective Civil Cor_r jurisdiction for its execution. Thereafter, the pe titioners filed E.P.No.I94 of 2024 before the Chief Judl3 :, City Civil Court at Hyderabad for execution of decree pass :d in L.G.C No.74 of i999. The Chief Judge, City Civil Cr rrt ujde its order dated 09.06.2025 had concluded that th: said Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the said tr_p o examine Ex.P34 i.e., the decree in L.G.C No.74 of 1999. shall stand 'ts having

4. It is further submitted that due t(, delay in proceedings, the petitioners could not avail the tenelits of the decree passed in L.G.C No.74 of 1999 on O .02.2006. ; I I I I I II ., Therefore, the petitioners submitted a representation dated 1O.06.2025 before the Revenue Divisional Ofhcer respondent No.3 to implement the judgment and decree passed in L.G.C No.74 of 1999, dated 01.02.2006, but respondent No.3 failed to act upon the same. Therefore, the petitioners filed reminder on 23.06.2025 to implement the said decree. Since respondent No.3 did not act upon the representations, the petitioners filed the present writ petition to pass appropriate orders.

5. l,earned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment, on instructions, would submit ttrat respondents will consider the applications in accordance with law.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment and without going into merits or demerits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to direct respondent No.3 to examine the case of the petitioners to implement the judgment and decree in L.G.C No.74 of 1999 ald conduct proceedings by causing necessary notices to the petitioners 4 ar.rd all other interested parties arrd by gralr.i rg sufflcient opportunity of hearing, pass appropria t,-- orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possi: r: preferably within a period of six (06) months from the d. re of receipt of a copy of this order. 7 . Accordingly, this writ petition is dispos,: I of. There shall be no order as to costs Miscelianeous applications, if any pe r ding, shalt stand closed //TRUE COPY// t I \ .J To, SD/./ SRINIVASA REDDY SI ISTANT REGISTRAR \ SECTION OFFICER Colrt, under_T.S., Land Grabbirrr (prohibition) Act 1 The Registrar, 2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue, Secretariat, Hvder; lad ^Special 3. Revenue Division Officer, Secunderabad 4. [,4andal Revenue Officer, Shaikpet Mandal, Hvderabad 5. One CC to Ms. DIVYA RAI SOHNT Advocate-tOpUCl 6. Two CCs to GP FOR ASSTGNMENT ,High Cdurt foril-t State of Tetangana 7. Two CD Copies h... BM '7 BS HIGH COURT DATED:1411012025 ORDER WP.No.20539 of 2025 11 1,, \(i,,.\\ /' 'l I r'. il ztH ,ii ..',} -'. / J_) _ - .rr>- DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS $ L0