✦ High Court of India · 26 Aug 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 26 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
26 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,067 words

Acts & Sections

2. firlohammed Abdul Samee, S/o Mohammed Abdul Khader, aged about 50 years, F/o 18-91-1 , NGOs Colony, Nandini High School, Narsapur, Medak District. Telangana. .....PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana -500063.

2. The lnspector General, Stamps and Registrations Department, Telangana, Hyderabad.

3. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Station Road, Nampally, Hyderabad-500001 .

4. The District Collector, Ivledak District. Telangana.- 502110. 5. Revenue DiVisional Officer, Narsapur, [Vledak District. 6. The District Panchayat Officer, Medak District, Telangana. 7. The Gram Panchayat Office, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary Chippalthurthy(GP), Narsapur Mandal, Medak District.

8. The Tahsildar and Jt Sub-Registrar, Narsapur Mandal, Medak District. 9. The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, rep. by its Metropolitan Commissioner, Swarnajayanthi Commercial Complex, Ameerpet, Hyderabad- 500 038.

10. K.S.Satyanarayana Prasad, S/o Ankineedu, aged about xx years, Occ ; business, R/o Chippalturthy Village, Narsapur Mandal, fvledak District. '1 '1 - Smt.Siripurapu Jyothi, Wo Satyanarayana, Aged about.xx years, Oc ;. housewife, Rio Chippalturthy Village, Narsapur Mandal, Medak District. 1 3 'l2.Siripurapu Sharath Chandra, S/o Satyanarayana. Aoed about xx vears onr:. business , Rl/o Chippatturthy Vilage. I'larsapur M;nd;[ nit"oir, Oi'.i,ili' "-" ' f.y11irygapu,Seethat,.D/o Satyanarayana, Aged atout.xx years, Occ ; Dusrness, H/o chipparturthy Viflage, Narsapur lrlandar Medak Distiict. 14. Lokineni Arlanohar Rao, S/o.late Venkat Rao, Aged abtut 6g years, Occ ; business R/o ptot No..1 , Sy.No.14Z, Saraswattritiijar Corony. [oir.,r-f *i", Tirumalagiri, Hyderabad- SOOOt S.

15. Lokineni Vanaja, W/o Manohar Rao, Aged about 62 y€,ars, Occ ; Household, ry,9.!9!ry9 1,,-Sy No 'l42,_Sara.swat'ni &isar alioln-y, Lotnurunta, I trumaragtn. Hyderabad_ 50001S.

16. Lokineni Anirud h, S/o Manohar Rao, Aged about 43 years, Occ. Business , N.o. 1,,,Sy. No. 1 42,_Salaswath i tia gar Cotony,' r otnut untr, Iy, g !l_gt_ I trumatagtfl. Hyderabad_ 500015. 17. Lgkineni Shalini, W/o Lokineni Anirudh, Aged about 37years. Occ ; Business . Iy,g llg!N.o. 1,,,Sy.No 142,_Salaswathi Na[aidoronv, L6inur,u.,t;; -""' """' r trumatagtfl. Hyderabad_ 500015. --' lB.Venkanagari Naveen Kumar, S/o Venkat Rao, aged about 46 years, Occ. Business, No 2-5O11 , Ward No.2 Narsapur, trrteOlk _SOZ:tg. ' 19- Venkanagari Navaneetha, W/o Naveen Kumar, Aged about 39 years, Occ Household, No 2-5011 , Ward No.2 Narsapur, [,1"0-it -:,oZSlS.

20.Sankaraneni Balakishan, S/oAnantha Rao, Aged Aboit 52 years, Occ. --' Business Rl/o H. No, 1 -1 2, Ir/edak Ma ndal, Sa ro-frani, veoaX_ib) ibO. ,....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Articre 226 of the constitution of rnc ia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction m.re particurarry one in the nature of writ of l\rrandamus decraring the action of the respondents No..1 to to 6 for not acting on the representation dated 1s- o4-2o2s ror conducting proper enquiry regarding the illegal entries in land records fi)cilitated by Lr. No. E1r867r2020, dated 31-07-2020 issued by the respondent No.4 herein to the respondent No.2 herern with respect to rand in Sy. Nos. 5g/1 to 5 and.r2 and 59/30, 3'1 , 32 and 40 to an extent of Ac.112.21 gts situated at chipparthurthy village of Narsapur Mandar, Medak District herein caled as schedure rand as illegal, arbitrary, vioration and against the principres of naturar justice and consequenfly direct the officiar respondents to produce arr rr.,cords and take legal action pertaining to the schedule land in Sy.Nos. 58/1 to 5 ar,di2 and 59/30,31,32 and 40 admeasuring of Ac.'1 12.21 gts sftuated at chippalthurthy viilage of Narsapur Mandal, lr,4edak District. l.A.NO:1 OF 2O25 Petition under section i 5i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cou( may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondent No.g herein not to permit any registration or alienation lands in sy.Nos. 5B/1 to s and12 and 59/30, 3i, 32 and 40 admeasuring of Ac.1 12.21 gts situated at Chippalthurthy village of Narsapur Mandal, Medak District, pending disposal of the main writ petition. |.A.NO:2 OF 2025 Petition Under Section i 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondents No.6 and 7 herein not to permit any illegal construction on lands in sy.Nos. 58/1 to s and12 and 59/30, 31, 32 and 40 admeasuring of Ac.'1 12.21 grs situated at chippalthurthy village of Narsapur I\Iandal, Medak District, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI VOOSA RAGHU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 & I : AGp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : AGp FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ Counsel for the Respondent No.7 : SRI K.pRADEEp REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.9 : SRI V.NARASIMHA GOUD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.10 to 20 : - The Court made the following ORDER l T HE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.20542 OF 2 02i.i ORAL ORDER: After arguing for some time, Mr. Voosa Raghu. leamcd counsel for the petitioners. seeks permission ol this Coun t: rvithdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file Public Inlerest Litigation (PIL). He has also made an endorsement on thc cast: bundle to that effect. Permission is accordcd. Granting liberty. as sought, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In the circumstances of the (:ase. there shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous pctitions. if trn1, pcnding in this writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.A. DEPUTY V.S.PRASAD REG/STRAR SECTI fni5r.'"r*

1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the Slate of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] -GP

2. Two CCs to FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ, High Court for the State of Telanqana at HYderabad. [OUTI

3. One CC to Snt voOSA RAGHU, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI V.NARASIMHA GOUD, Advocate (OPJC) 5. One CC to SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY, Advocate (OPUC) 6. Two CD CoPies To SA GJP HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 .k-. ?.'(rE sr4 t ( a (.) 02 SEc lIE 0( 'I 1 'l' o S,- ll (.Ht t-) -:-=.-. ORDER WP.No.20542 ot 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. @

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments