Mr. Kornmaredd,r'lagore v. This Criminal Petition is fi1ed under Section 482 ol-the Code
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this Criminal petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, this Criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, pending il any, shall stand closed. SD/. K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER The Vll Additional Metropolitan lVagistrate, Kukatpally at Kukatpally, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy Distnct. The Station House Officer, Raidurgam Police…
Judgment
Cause title
[rlr. Konrmaredcly lagore. Sio KVV prasad Aged aboul 42 years. Occ. plvale Employee R/o H No 8 I J01/88 I akshrr., tta-gai Cotony, B;lr;; fifiiC' fir"u Shaikpet Nara, Gorconda, Hyderabacr-50oooa . -'pErrrror.rEnracCusED N".;- AND The State of Telangana, Represented by public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad Sri. Saranala Sridhar Rao. S1o S Babu Rao Aged about 4g years, Occ. Business, R/o. Plot No 13-15, Nandagirr Hills, Jubitee HrtiJ-UGranaO 500033 Respondent No 1 2 ...RESPONDENT
No.2 / DE-FACTO COMPLATNANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praytng that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandunr of Grounds of crrminar petrtion, the High court may-be pleased to call for the record relating to crime No 726 of zo24 olteo z: ol .iozq on the file of the Raidurgam porrce Station. cyberabad for the offences punishabre under sedtrons 408, 420 rndran penai code, and quash the proceedrngs therein. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 52g of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court miy-b" qfeggeO to stay all further proceedings rn Crime No. 726 7t ZOZq, aLt"a 23.o7.2024 on the fire of the Raidurgam Forrce station, cyberabad for the offences punishable under sections 4oB, 4zo R/w. 1208 Indian penar cooe fenoing disposal of the above crimrnal petition This Petition comtng on for hearing, upon perusing the lVlemorandum of Grounds of criminar Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri KATTKA RAVINDER REDDY ,Advocate for the petitioner and SRI E GANESH, Addt. Public Prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and Sri K. SATHAKARNT, Advocate for the Respondent No 2 The Court made the following
ORDER:
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAITGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITION No.8731 OF 2024 DATE: 06.02.2026 Between: Mr. Kornmaredd,r'lagore Thc Stzrtc of Telangana and another AND ORDER: ... Petitione r-accused No. 1 ...Respondents This Criminal Petition is fi1ed under Section 482 ol-the Code of Criminerl Procedure (for short 'Cr.P.C,1973) seeking quashment of thc proceedings against thc petitioner-accu scci No- L in Crime No.726 of 2024 on the file of Raidurgam Policc Station, Cyber':rbad
Heard learnerl counsel for the pctitioner ar-r d Mr.tr. Ganes(, I learned A<lditional Public Prosecutor appearing for t}-rc rcspondent No.1 Statc. !I
The petitioner is arrayed as accused No. I in Crime No.726 of 2024 for the offences under Section 4O8, 42O of IpC.
Learned Additional Public prosecutor submitted that after due investigation, final report has been flled closing the matter as 'lack of evidence' on 28.12.2024. Hence, nothing further remains in this matter for deliberation and prays for dismissal of the petition.
Having regard to the development, and as the prosecution has hled final report and the crirne itself has ended, nothing further remains in this petition lor consideration
Operative part
Accordingly, this Criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, pending il any, shall stand closed. SD/. K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER The Vll Additional Metropolitan lVagistrate, Kukatpally at Kukatpally, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy Distnct. The Station House Officer, Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. Two CCS to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT) One CC to SRl. KATIKA RAVINDER REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI K. SATHAKARNI, Advocate (OPUC) Two CD Copies \ To, o 1 2 4 5 t) HIGH COURT DATED:06/02/2026 ORDER CRL.PETITION No.8731 of 2024 o O t .THE S f4 ( nR 18 I'iAR 2026 ( * OATCH * I)ISI{ISSIN(; THI.] C'I{I-.I'I'TI'IION AS INFRIJC'IT'OI iS 0 )
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Criminal petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 52, 528; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 06 Feb 2026. The bench was N TUKARAMJI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.