I\/edipally Ramulu v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 in not acted upon my representation dt. 16-04-2025 and 25-04-2025 in restraining unlawful and arbitrary action of Respondent No.6 in making illegal Brick kilns by trespasslng in the agricultural lands in Sy. No. 313, to an extent of Ac. 18-00 gts l : : I situated at Annaram village of Gummadidla Mandal, Sangit taking permissions from any competent authorities anc chemicals and firing brick kilns, the entire land of the Petiti: have become chemically contaminated for which in spite of eddy District without due to the use of rer and others lands receiving complaints in not taking action by the Respondents 2 to 5 against Resp,r arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and also 'r and 300 A Constitutional of lndia and consequently direct :l to stop the illegal making brick kilns in Sy. No.313 ol I Gummadidala Mandal, Sangareddy District. ndent No.6 is illegal, ;lation of At1. 14, 21 e Respondent No. 6 nnaram Village and l.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c I )umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cot r may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 6 to stop the illegal making brick I ilns in Sy. No. 313 of Annaram Village and Gummadidala [t4andal, Sangarec jy District pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI PALLE SRIHARINATH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.'l to 4 : SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.S : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : -- The Court made the following ORDER @ .a THE HONOURABLE SRJ JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.2O326 of 2O25 ORDER: This Writ Petition is liled by the petjtioner seeking a nVrit of Mandamus' declaring the action of respondent Nos. 2 to 5 in not acting upon his representation dated 16.04.2025 and, 25.04.2025, submitted by requesting them to restrain respondent No.6 in making iilegal brick kilns by trespassing into Government land in Sy.No.313 to a extent of Ac.18-00 gts situated at Annaram Viilage, Gummadidla Mandal, Sangareddy Duistrict, without taking permission from any competent authority, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

3. The petitioner is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.O.2O gts in Sy.No.313/3,A and Ac.O.20 gts in Sy.No.313/3/AA, total Ac. 1-OO gts situated at Annararn Village, Gummadidla Mandal, Sangaredy District and also lands in other survey numbers in the very same village. In proof cf the same, he has hied copies of pattadar passbooks and title leeds.

4. It is the specific allegation of the petitir:r-r :r herein that the 6h respondent is illegally running bric)< kilns in the assigned lald admeasuring Ac. 18-00 gts. Tlrrr efore, he had submitted a representation dated L6.O4.2A2 I to the 4e respondent with a request to take action e 1 ainst the 6e respondent. Despite reieiving and ackno,*,lec ging the said representation, the 4tl respondent did not act u )on the same. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petitiorr is hled.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader 1e r Revenue on in structions would submit that the 4th rr:r pondent will consider the said representation dated 16.C2 .2O25 of the petitioner and take action against the 6m respc ndent strictly in accordance rvith law, by putting the petition :r ald the 6& respondent on notice and also affording an c pportunity of hearing to them.

6. in the light of the said submission, not ce to the 6h respondent is dispensed with. -f-l J

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 4tr, respondent to consider the representation dated

16.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner arrd take action against the 66 respondent, strictly in accordance with law, by putting the petitioner and the 6ft respondent on notice artd also affording an opportunity of hearing to them. However, the 4e respondent shali complete the said exercise within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. /ITRUE COPY// SD/. A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ./' L7 SECTION OFFICER To at Hvderabad.

1. The Principal Secretary, (Revenue) Secretariat Buildings' State of Telangana ,. ?i ;'dt;il;idollector' Sansareddv District at ^sansareddv' 3. The Revenue Divisionat ;ift;;, s;"s;i"ooy oiri."ion. Sangareddv District. ;. iii; i;h;ildr;, Gummaoidata Manda-I, Sansareddv Diskict' s. if.r" Srp"r.tendent of Police, Sangare{dy District d. ii,i""tur-ii'oi;toi{nEvEr'jue, Hign court for the state of Telansana at ? i',l,;"bC;b 6C rbn HoME, High court for the state of relansana at 8. 6'":'#i; diipnr-r-e sRIHARINATH, Advocate [oPUC] 9. Two CD CoPies Hvderabad. [OUTI Hvderabad. [OUT] I t t i ,") ' t... I wt' 711y ,/,.,- /i'.;- * ' --:.' HIGH COURT DATED:2510812025 ORDER WP.No.20326 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. \1