Smt. V Shamala, Wo v. Sudhakar Reddy, Dio T Ram Reddy, Aged about

10. T. Laxmi Narsimha Reddy, S/o Sri. Ram Reddy, Aged about 57 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o H.No. 2-70, Badangpet Village, Saroornagar Mandal. Ranga Reddy District 11 Smt. V Shamala, Wo V. Sudhakar Reddy, Dio T Ram Reddy, Aged about 37 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H.No. 2-70, Badangpet Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 12 G Subhash Reddy, S/o Late G. Ram Reddy, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o H.No.'1-14, Chaitanyapuri, Dilsukhnagar. Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue wrrt, order or direction especially one in the Nature of Writ of Ivlandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.5 in interfering with civil drspute pending between the petitioners and the respondents 6 to 12 by calling the petitioners to the 5th respondent police station without following due process of law and without any valid reasons, thereby interfering with the personal liberty and day to day agricultural activities of the petitioners on the instructions of the respondents 6 to 12 without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, unlust, u ncon stitutiona l, violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of lndia and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 especially the respondent No.5 not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between the petitioners and respondents 6 to 12 by calling the petitioners to the Sth respondent police station without following due procedure of law in the interest of lustice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5 especially the respondent No.5 not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between the petitioners and respondents 6 to 12 by calling the petitioners to the 5'e respondent police station without following due I €87 procedure of law in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P.BHANU PRAKASH Counsel for the Respondents No.1tos : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.6to12 : -- The Court made the following: ORDER 7 .,/ THE HON'BLE SRI ]USTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No,20338 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.l 'to 5, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition at the admission stage and the nature of /s involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 12 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. The case of the petitioners, in brief, is that, the 5th respondent is interfering in the civil dispute at the behest of the unofficial respondents herein without following due process of law, which actlon oF the respondents-authorities it is contended as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, u nconstitutional and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

4. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 5, while denying the writ averments, would submit that on 06.07.2025, the respondents-authorities have received three dial-100 calls between 11.00 AM and 11.03 AM; that upon receiving the dial-100 calls, the patrolling vehicle visited the disputed land, wherein 2 .l:' the respondents-authorities have found that the petitioners and the unolficial respondents herein were quarreling claiming the subject land to be a disputed land; and that the authorities have advised both the parties not to create public nuisance as that may lead to law and order issue warranting initiation of necessary action by the respondents and directed the parties to approach the revenue authorities to resolve their dispute in relation to the subject land.

5. Learned Government Pleader further submits that the respondents- authorities, except ensuring maintenance of peace and law and order situation, are not interfering in the civil dispute between the parties or taking sides.

6. I have taken note of the respective contentions urged.

7. Having regard to the submissions made as above, since, it is stated that the respondents-authorities on receiving the dial-100 calls on

06.07.2025, having visited the subject land and noticing that both the petitioners and the unofficial respondents herein quarreling in relation to the subject land, which it is claimed as a disputed land, and having advised both the parties not to create public nuisance warranting initiation of necessary action by them, for maintenance of law and order, this Court is of the view that while the respondents-authorities are to be directed not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioners and the unofficial ._-'*fil ^t 3 respondents herein, however/ are directed to maintain peace and law and order situation at the subject site, in accordance with the provisions of BNSS and the Police Act.

8. Subject to above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

9. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/.P. PONNA KRISHNA A S STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER 1 The Principa].S9creJa1V., Home Department, Dr.B.R Ambedkar Telangana Secretariat. State of Telangana. Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate. Office at Neredmet, lvledchal-Ma lkajg iri District.

3. The Dy. Commissioner of Police, L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of police, Vanasthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District-

5. The Station House Officer, Meerpet. police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 6. One CC to SRt P BHANU pRAKASH, Advocate. tOpUCl 7. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Tetangana. [OUT] 8. Two CD Copies BSK ^A BS IfY HIGH COURT DATED:1610712025 I /K i ilE S T4I (i 2I JUt ?ofi t .SPATC\I o ( ( \ ORDER WP.No.20338 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS A- t 9q ..(-L/) \ €